GeoX
Member
Latest EstroBan label as of 11/2020:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Sorry I'm a bit confused with the census on EstroBan. Isn't it advised to take fat solubles apart from each other? There's been tons of posts about this, here and other forums. So what's up with that?
Reckon haidut wouldn't just mix them nonchalantly. Thanks for the amazing reply that does make sense!The product was released based off his own research into what quantities of each vitamin wouldn’t interfere with the absorption of the others. So vitamin E and K is a fine balancing act, as absorption of K can be affected by too much E (for instance). Saying that, the original formula only had about 95 IU (I think it was), whereas now, it’s 200 IU. So perhaps he feels that extra vitamin E won’t affect 2mg of K2 intake.
He’s also mentioned a few times that he wouldn’t just supplement vitamin D without taking vitamin A as well, and usually in a ratio (was it 5:1?) So the vitamin A helps the vitamin D exert positive effects within the body (if the body needed to increase its levels). I think the concept behind the product is that the fat solubles all interact with each other in a way that supports the health of the body, as supplementing them individually can cause problems.
So by releasing this product he’s trying to make it easier for people to not have to worry about supplementing them individually, and then run into issues where they may be taking too much of one particular vitamin.
It all comes down to whether you trust his judgement on that research he’s done, I suppose.
BumpSorry I'm a bit confused with the census on EstroBan. Isn't it advised to take fat solubles apart from each other? There's been tons of posts about this, here and other forums. So what's up with that?
Georgi has addressed this in this thread. Taking them together in the referenced dosage should not be a problem, dawg.Bump
Especially e and k
Jorge, I think that it would be advantageous to reduce the poison A in EstroBan because our diets are heavily contaminated. The best scenario would be someone that doesn't consume preformed poison and relies on an inefficient conversion, this person would be intoxicating with at least 1500 mcg of poisonol from a serving of the supplement. However, we know that many members consume a lot of carotenes and sometimes liver; dairy and eggs don't provide too much, but add up.The optimal ratio is not really known but has been suggested to be in the 1:2 up to 1:5 range in regards to D:A.
Jorge, I think that it would be advantageous to reduce the poison A in EstroBan
While he ponders decontaminating his product, the current mass ratio is A 30:1 D, you is after 8:1 (or 32:4). Quadrupling the killciol content would get you close to the ratio that you want.@haidut I've been experimenting with Estroban for years and now avoid Estroban because of the A. For me, the ideal ratio is about 1:1, if even that (and I'm including the weekly 3oz of lamb liver).
Ideal Estroban for me: 2,000 IU A, 3,000 IU D3, 200 IU E. 2 mg MK4, SFA/ethanol for daily "belly-button" dose.
The simplest measure is to combine it with a venom D supplement.