Beastmode
Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Messages
- 1,258
Me: I’d like to research vaccines and wanted to ask about your general opinion since there is so much noise online. Do vaccines even work against the illness they are meant to work against? My impression is that science mixed up “inflammation” and “immune response” and that is why they are using dangerous adjuvants that trigger the inflammatory response. What is your view on that?
Ray: Have you seen Suzanne Humphries’ things on vaccination? Your comment about inflammation vs immune response describes the situation exactly. I think inflammation is often a sign that the body’s resistance is low. The body is designed to handle viral and bacterial infections entering through the respiratory and digestive systems, and antigens of introduced by injection don’t produce the same reactions that the normally acquired infections do. The 20th century medical model of the immune system introduced by Paul Ehrlich was designed to promote the sale of drugs, and is corrupt at its core. Jamie Cunliffe (“damage”) and Polly Matzinger (“danger”) have introduced more biological models of immunity, that I think should displace the Ehrlich model. Good oxidative metabolism, with optimal vitamin D and thyroid function, gets people through epidemics without getting sick, despite being exposed to the thing that made others sick.
Clin Transl Med. 2018 Jul 2;7(1):20.
Cancer; an induced disease of twentieth century! Induction of tolerance,
increased entropy and 'Dark Energy': loss of biorhythms (Anabolism v.
Catabolism).
Khatami M(1).
(1)Inflammation, Aging and Cancer, National Cancer Institute (NCI), National
Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA. [email protected].
Maintenance of health involves a synchronized network of catabolic and anabolic
signals among organs/tissues/cells that requires differential bioenergetics from
mitochondria and glycolysis (biological laws or biorhythms). We defined
biological circadian rhythms as Yin (tumoricidal) and Yang (tumorigenic) arms of
acute inflammation (effective immunity) involving immune and non-immune systems.
Role of pathogens in altering immunity and inducing diseases and cancer has been
documented for over a century. However, in 1955s decision makers in
cancer/medical establishment allowed public (current baby boomers) to consume
million doses of virus-contaminated polio vaccines. The risk of cancer incidence
and mortality sharply rose from 5% (rate of hereditary/genetic or innate disease)
in 1900s, to its current scary status of 33% or 50% among women and men,
respectively. Despite better hygiene, modern detection technologies and discovery
of antibiotics, baby boomers and subsequent 2-3 generations are sicker than
previous generations at same age. American health status ranks last among other
developed nations while America invests highest amount of resources for
healthcare. In this perspective we present evidence that cancer is an induced
disease of twentieth century, facilitated by a great deception of cancer/medical
establishment for huge corporate profits. Unlike popularized opinions that cancer
is 100, 200 or 1000 diseases, we demonstrate that cancer is only one disease; the
severe disturbances in biorhythms (differential bioenergetics) or loss of balance
in Yin and Yang of effective immunity. Cancer projects that are promoted and
funded by decision makers are reductionist approaches, wrong and unethical and
resulted in loss of millions of precious lives and financial toxicity to society.
Public vaccination with pathogen-specific vaccines (e.g., flu, hepatitis, HPV,
meningitis, measles) weakens, not promotes, immunity. Results of irresponsible
projects on cancer sciences or vaccines are increased population of
drug-dependent sick society. Outcome failure rates of claimed 'targeted' drugs,
'precision' or 'personalized' medicine are 90% (± 5) for solid tumors. We
demonstrate that aging, frequent exposures to environmental hazards, infections
and pathogen-specific vaccines and ingredients are 'antigen overload' for immune
system, skewing the Yin and Yang response profiles and leading to induction of
'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe' immune disorders. Induction of decoy or pattern
recognition receptors (e.g., PRRs), such as IRAK-M or IL-1dRs ('designer'
molecules) and associated genomic instability and over-expression of growth
promoting factors (e.g., pyruvate kinases, mTOR and PI3Ks, histamine, PGE2, VEGF)
could lead to immune tolerance, facilitating cancer cells to hijack anabolic
machinery of immunity (Yang) for their increased growth requirements. Expression
of constituent embryonic factors would negatively regulate differentiation of
tumor cells through epithelial-mesenchymal-transition and create "dual negative
feedback loop" that influence tissue metabolism under hypoxic conditions. It is
further hypothesized that induction of tolerance creates 'dark energy' and
increased entropy and temperature in cancer microenvironment allowing disorderly
cancer proliferation and mitosis along with increased glucose metabolism via
Crabtree and Pasteur Effects, under mitophagy and ribophagy, conditions that are
toxic to host survival. Effective translational medicine into treatment requires
systematic and logical studies of complex interactions of tumor cells with host
environment that dictate clinical outcomes. Promoting effective immunity
(biological circadian rhythms) are fundamental steps in correcting host
differential bioenergetics and controlling cancer growth, preventing or delaying
onset of diseases and maintaining public health. The author urges independent
professionals and policy makers to take a closer look at cancer dilemma and stop
the 'scientific/medical ponzi schemes' of a powerful group that control a
drug-dependent sick society before all hopes for promoting public health
evaporate.
Clin Transl Med. 2016 Dec;5(1):35.
Is cancer a severe delayed hypersensitivity reaction and histamine a blueprint?
Khatami M(1).
(1)National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institutes of Health (NIH),
Bethesda, MD, USA. [email protected].
Longevity and accumulation of multiple context-dependent signaling pathways of
long-standing inflammation (antigen-load or oxidative stress) are the results of
decreased/altered regulation of immunity and loss of control switch mechanisms
that we defined as Yin and Yang of acute inflammation or immune surveillance.
Chronic inflammation is initiated by immune disruptors-induced progressive
changes in physiology and function of susceptible host tissues that lead to
increased immune suppression and multistep disease processes including
carcinogenesis. The interrelated multiple hypotheses that are presented for the
first time in this article are extension of author's earlier series of
'accidental' discoveries on the role of inflammation in developmental stages of
immune dysfunction toward tumorigenesis and angiogenesis. Detailed analyses of
data on chronic diseases suggest that nearly all age-associated illnesses,
generally categorized as 'mild' (e.g., increased allergies), 'moderate' (e.g.,
hypertension, colitis, gastritis, pancreatitis, emphysema) or 'severe' (e.g.,
accelerated neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases or site-specific cancers
and metastasis) are variations of hypersensitivity responses of tissues that are
manifested as different diseases in immune-responsive or immune-privileged
tissues. Continuous release/presence of low level histamine (subclinical) in
circulation could contribute to sustained oxidative stress and induction of
'mild' or 'moderate' or 'severe' (immune tsunami) immune disorders in susceptible
tissues. Site-specific cancers are proposed to be 'severe' (irreversible) forms
of cumulative delayed hypersensitivity responses that would induce immunological
chaos in favor of tissue growth in target tissues. Shared or special features of
growth from fetus development into adulthood and aging processes and
carcinogenesis are briefly compared with regard to energy requirements of highly
complex function of Yin and Yang. Features of Yang (growth-promoting) arm of
acute inflammation during fetus and cancer growth will be compared for consuming
low energy from glycolysis (Warburg effect). Growth of fetus and cancer cells
under hypoxic conditions and impaired mitochondrial energy requirements of
tissues including metabolism of essential branched amino acids (e.g., val, leu,
isoleu) will be compared for proposing a working model for future systematic
research on cancer biology, prevention and therapy. Presentation of a working
model provides insightful clues into bioenergetics that are required for fetus
growth (absence of external threat and lack of high energy-demands of Yin events
and parasite-like survival in host), normal growth in adulthood (balance in Yin
and Yang processes) or disease processes and carcinogenesis (loss of balance in
Yin-Yang). Future studies require focusing on dynamics and promotion of
natural/inherent balance between Yin (tumoricidal) and Yang (tumorigenic) of
effective immunity that develop after birth. Lawless growth of cancerous cells
and loss of cell contact inhibition could partially be due to impaired
mitochondria (mitophagy) that influence metabolism of branched chain amino acids
for biosynthesis of structural proteins. The author invites interested scientists
with diverse expertise to provide comments, confirm, dispute and question and/or
expand and collaborate on many components of the proposed working model with the
goal to better understand cancer biology for future designs of cost-effective
research and clinical trials and prevention of cancer. Initial events during
oxidative stress-induced damages to DNA/RNA repair mechanisms and inappropriate
expression of inflammatory mediators are potentially correctable, preventable or
druggable, if future studies were to focus on systematic understanding of early
altered immune response dynamics toward multistep chronic diseases and
carcinogenesis.
He's on a role with his vaccine responses. Unfortunately, The U.S government knows nothing about supporting "supportive" science for optimal health.