Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Well, I think some people feel that the synthetic thyroid products are less likely to be deactivated by the skin if they are dissolved in DMSO due to the potentiation factor and because it is absorbed immediately, which also makes it much more convenient . I think the other (bigger) issue is your refusal to disclose exactly what these "SFA esters" are. I think it makes people nervous (not just me), and it seems odd that you wouldn't want to share that with loyal customers. Your consumer base has a lot of people who have environmental sensitivities, some who are still very sick, and I think they have the right to know exactly what kind of chemical they are ingesting or rubbing on their body. Simply saying something is "very very safe" isn't very reassuring to me. I've heard that many times before and thats how I ended up where I am now.
The benefits that people get from doing business with you go far beyond the supplement itself. In my opinion, that should be your attitude as a business owner. Why fear competition? You are far and away the superior company because of your quick shipments and the fact that you make yourself available to everyone. You're creating distrust among your consumer base because you think your success as a business hinges on this "secret ingredient." Seems silly to me. I don't know who your competitors are, but you should already know that no one on this forum is out to get you.
Some food for thoughts:
I don't doubt that DMSO is bad for a lot of people. But it is cheap and very effective for others, so I don't see what the downside is with throwing it in as a second or third option. Some of us were also getting results from testicular application of steroids/vitamins and I am waiting for someone to tell me that SFA esters works just as well for this purpose. Using tyromix in this way is the *only* thing that made a significant difference in my health. I suppose I could just buy some DMSO and do that myself, but it's a lot less convenient. The bottom line for me is that it shouldn't be eliminated just because people are scared of even hearing "DMSO," because it's sounding like that's the only reason. The lack of interest doesn't seem valid to me, because if his customer base isn't just a loyal base of forum members, then it wouldn't surprise me why a lot of people wouldn't kick up a fuss because DMSO is gone. Most people casually buying supplements don't even think about additives, solvents or quality. They would only question DMSO because it burns when they apply it topically. I say make SFA esters/ethanol the default option. DMSO enthusiasts will have to manually select for it.
So since you want to use a solvent that has a lot of side effects for some, has been recommended against by Ray and even more so on the testicles ('I can' t think of a worse place to use it') what would make you not use a solvent based on safety? Ray has spoken highly about progesterone.
It was both actually - out of caution (due to the reports and studies of side effects), and to see if the "dark side" really has an issue with DMSO or is simply using it as a cover for their hate for me. I think we know the answer to the second one
I know how my body reacts to DMSO and I seriously doubt putting any kind of saturated fat on the testes is much better for that area, which Ray also warned against.
