tankasnowgod
Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2014
- Messages
- 8,131
This is unbecoming. You're just doing playground bullying, and not paying any attention at ALL to the article I posted.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you DID post the following, right?
"I'm sincerely curious, since you strongly make your case - what happens if Trump loses, and by a landslide? Will you rethink the assumptions you've made, and your own decision process, or rethink where you get your information?
It's an honest question, that seems to not be asked. Like all those Bernie supporters who said ONLY Bernie can beat Trump - how will they resolve that with Hillary winning?
I think most people whitewash it away. This is not a dis or accusation - I did it myself after I was sure Kerry would beat Bush. What I did was go 'oops' and basically sweep it under the carpet.
Lately I've gotten a lot more brutally honest with myself, and try to challenge my assumptions and biases as I can discover them. Data actually matters, but it takes a leap of faith to fully trust it.
I think a lot of the Right had a great opportunity to reevaluate after Obama beat Romney - their plan to beat math by 'unskewing' failed miserably - yet Trump's people are doing the same thing with uncontrolled online polls.
NOT saying Hillary over Trump in this comment, but I'm curious how a Trump loss will change how you think.
I'm in the same boat. I trust the 'good' pollsters out there like FiveThirtyEight, and use data to challenge my emotional preferences. But if Hillary loses? I'll need to do some serious rethinking on all of that."
And...
"It's one of those things like gravity and air. Facts matter. And this idea there's a voting scam is just made-up BS. People repeat it because it massages their paranoia and sense of stolen entitlement, but it's not true."
Sooooooo..... why would I pay any attention to an article you posted? Have you done any of that "serious rethinking" you talked about in that comment? You're STILL reading Daily KOS?
So when Trump suggested that the process might be "rigged" before the election, it was CLEARLY made up BS (nevermind that some third party candidate that came in a distant 4th is demanding a bizarre recount). So how is your claim of "pervasive voter suppression in red states" not clearly made up BS?