Articles of Impeachment

[nomoreketones]

The only direct quotes by Trump in the articles of impeachment are the following:

"we won this election, and we won it by a landslide"

"if you don’t fight like hell you’re not going to have a country anymore"

"find"

Articles of Impeachment

https://cicilline.house.gov/sites/cicilline.house.gov/files/documents/ARTICLES%20-%20Final%201030%20-%20011121.pdf

 

[tankasnowgod]

PANIC IN DC!

Odd, the more insane the Demon Crats get, along with Big Tech and establishment RINOs and such, the more confident I become that Trump is, indeed, winning, and that the CGI Beijing Biden clone will never be President.

They sure ain't acting like winners.

 

[nomoreketones]

I think everything going on is a consolidation of power by the fascist regime that took over the United States.

 

[tankasnowgod]

I think everything going on is a consolidation of power by the fascist regime that took over the United States.

Why would they do that 87 years after the fact?

 

[nomoreketones]

Why would they do that 87 years after the fact?

Are you speaking of this?

Business Plot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Are you putting forth the idea that the fascists actually took over the United States in 1934 and have been running the country behind the scenes since then?

If that were true, the implications are profound. It would mean that we all have been living with the false illusion of freedom for several decades.

 

[tankasnowgod]

Are you speaking of this?

Business Plot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Are you putting forth the idea that the fascists actually took over the United States in 1934 and have been running the country behind the scenes since then?

If that were true, the implications are profound. It would mean that we all have been living with the false illusion of freedom for several decades.

Well, specifically, I'm referring to the Gold Reserve Act, HJR 192, the Trading with the Enemy Amendment, and all the New Deal Programs. Fascists, Socialists, Communists, use whatever name you want, it's really the International Bankers that call themselves the World Revolutionary Movement. And it stretches back farther than that....... to the Federal Reserve Act, the Organic Act of 1871, and the 14th Amendment were all needed. Justice Harlan even commented on the idea of "two National Governments" in the US in the 1901 case of Downes vs. Bidwell.

The bottom line is that House Impeachment Articles (again!) are useless and counterproductive if Trump really did lose. And McConnell even stated that the earliest it could even get to the Senate is the 19th of this month.

Soooooooo........... What. Is. The. Point?

This just reeks of a desperation play........ it's 4th and 17 with 2:13 left in the fourth quarter, down 13, and you still have, have, HAVE to go for it anyway, because you are finished if you don't. And probably finished anyway. But 0.000001% is still better than 0%

 

[nomoreketones]

Soooooooo........... What. Is. The. Point?

They are going to impeach him now but not send the articles of impeachment to the senate for a few months. The point is to keep Trump from running again 2024 and to strip away his security detail.

 

[tankasnowgod]

They are going to impeach him now but not send the articles of impeachment to the senate for a few months. The point is to keep Trump from running again 2024 and to strip away his security detail.

Please. This is a "winner take all" deal. And everyone is all in. Whoever wins, the other side is finished. You DO know what the penalty for treason is?

If they had won, there would be no reason for impeachment now. Pointless desperation.

Even the explanation makes zero sense. What would change in the make up of the House between now and April?

 

[nomoreketones]

Please. This is a "winner take all" deal. And everyone is all in. Whoever wins, the other side is finished. You DO know what the penalty for treason is?

If they had won, there would be no reason for impeachment now. Pointless desperation.

Even the explanation makes zero sense. What would change in the make up of the House between now and April?

I didn't make this up. The mainstream media is reporting this.

Clyburn says Trump impeachment trial could be delayed until after Biden's first 100 days

Clyburn, a member of House Democratic leadership, said the vote to impeach Trump is likely to take place this week.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[tankasnowgod]

I didn't make this up. The mainstream media is reporting this.

Clyburn says Trump impeachment trial could be delayed until after Biden's first 100 days

Clyburn, a member of House Democratic leadership, said the vote to impeach Trump is likely to take place this week.

www.nbcnews.com

I didn't think you were making it up. It just doesn't make any logical sense. Not from a side who "won."

Remember, congress retains the power to impeach after a person has left office. Theoretically, they could impeach Jimmy Carter right now.

So again, there is zero reason to do this, unless it's an act of desperation, a Hail Mary, from the side that did indeed lose.

 

[nomoreketones]

I didn't think you were making it up. It just doesn't make any logical sense. Not from a side who "won."

Remember, congress retains the power to impeach after a person has left office. Theoretically, they could impeach Jimmy Carter right now.

So again, there is zero reason to do this, unless it's an act of desperation, a Hail Mary, from the side that did indeed lose.

Trump is the biggest and only threat to the fascists right now. They want to insure that this threat is eliminated by any means necessary.

 

[tankasnowgod]

Trump is the biggest and only threat to the fascists right now. They want to insure that this threat is eliminated by any means necessary.

Right. Which is why I say this is an act of desperation by people who lost.

 

[Rooster]

Congress CANNOT impeach someone who isn't in office. That's the law. If trump ran in 4 years he would be 8 years older if he won when his term ended. Its not happening... Either one.

 

[nomoreketones]

Congress CANNOT impeach someone who isn't in office. That's the law. If trump ran in 4 years he would be 8 years older if he won when his term ended. Its not happening... Either one.

From what I've read on main stream media, they will impeach the president before his term is up but they will wait a few months before delivering the articles of impeachment to the senate for the trial.

 

[tankasnowgod]

Congress CANNOT impeach someone who isn't in office.

Yes, they can.

 

[tankasnowgod]

From what I've read on main stream media, they will impeach the president before his term is up but they will wait a few months before delivering the articles of impeachment to the senate for the trial.

Again, pointless. They could impeach Trump at any time. Holding an active office in government is NOT a requirement.

 

[Sheik]

Does Trump have a way to communicate with the public directly now that he's off twatter?

 

[nomoreketones]

Does Trump have a way to communicate with the public directly now that he's off twatter?

Don't think so but at this point it's probably better for him to keep quiet. The democrats and mainstream media have completely lost their minds and have become completely unhinged. Let the American people see how crazy they are.

 

[Rooster]

Again, pointless. They could impeach Trump at any time. Holding an active office in government is NOT a requirement.

Yes it is.
Congress can't impeach me twice to prevent me from ever holding office.
You must be a sitting president to be impeached. They can't go and impeach Carter to stop him from holding office twice if he wanted to run.
The house will vote to impeach but the senate won't be back till trump is gone.

 

[tankasnowgod]

Yes it is.
Congress can't impeach me twice to prevent me from ever holding office.
You must be a sitting president to be impeached. They can't go and impeach Carter to stop him from holding office twice if he wanted to run.
The house will vote to impeach but the senate won't be back till trump is gone.

Wrong. You simply don't know what you are talking about.

Congress get's the power to impeach directly from the Constitution (Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5)-

The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

[get-content name="print-page-left" include-tag="false" /] Note: The following text is a transcription of the Constitution as it was inscribed by Jacob Shallus on parchment (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation reflect the original.

www.archives.gov

First of all, it's clear from reading the document that Impeachment isn't just for Presidents. Article 2 Section 4 makes that clear. And there is nothing to say that Impeachment is restricted to when an individual is holding office. That would be a silly restriction. Why would such a restriction be put on a high crime like Treason?

I don't know where you get this idea that actively holding office is some sort of requirement.