Haidut,
I am sorry but I have to say good bye at this point. It will take me ages to explain my point of view here. I mentioned simple things that are practiced daily in medical field. You can study it yourself , I know you are a smart guy . But I am not going to argue about studies. I have developed a complete system for myself, where I connected almost everything with everything and have it simultaneously changing. So to me all these singled out studies are total nonsense. For instance Ecks computers counts 12 enzymes for each mineral simultaneously and all interactions at the same time and here we talk about some study out of context on one subject. There is a complex system that have to be looed at all at once, and why would I post some stupid studies of pregnant women or a study on single other thing. It makes no sense.
According to my studies , the results dont match anything close to what Peats says, and knowing what I know makes it complete nonsense. I saw 1000 peoples metabolisms for 2 years and 100s of ABGs matches by hairtests. If I gave them all Peats diet, half of them would scream, since they are in complete non applicable diet to calcium let say or progesterone.
I have no idea where you see that Peat is right. YOu seem to look for studies on the internet without having a whole picture on your head. I will find you prove that I am right 10 thousand times also. You can always find a study that says one time one thing and another time another thing. BUt then you will argue on every little piece of that study. SOrry I am not interested in this at all. I test everything myself in the lab and I dont beileve in any study published on PUBmed, most of them is utter bull**** and did nto match what I tested.
If you like what you are doing with Peat, keep doing it. To me it makes absolutely no sense, I will go my way.
Sorry but I dont have time for this. Just posted here to clarify CO2 situation , if you dont understand how ABGs work , then there is not much to talk is there. It is very easy to learn how ABGs work. ANd how to read them and how to test them and what is Co2 ideal values and how to interpret all these tests.
From my population 80% had high CO2 level in blood not low.
I would advise you to study Ecks work, Peat looks like kindergarden player comparing to Eck/ Eck developed the system 40 years ago which is complete and matches every single type.
Bye , I cant post here anymore
Good luck to you all
I am sorry but I have to say good bye at this point. It will take me ages to explain my point of view here. I mentioned simple things that are practiced daily in medical field. You can study it yourself , I know you are a smart guy . But I am not going to argue about studies. I have developed a complete system for myself, where I connected almost everything with everything and have it simultaneously changing. So to me all these singled out studies are total nonsense. For instance Ecks computers counts 12 enzymes for each mineral simultaneously and all interactions at the same time and here we talk about some study out of context on one subject. There is a complex system that have to be looed at all at once, and why would I post some stupid studies of pregnant women or a study on single other thing. It makes no sense.
According to my studies , the results dont match anything close to what Peats says, and knowing what I know makes it complete nonsense. I saw 1000 peoples metabolisms for 2 years and 100s of ABGs matches by hairtests. If I gave them all Peats diet, half of them would scream, since they are in complete non applicable diet to calcium let say or progesterone.
I have no idea where you see that Peat is right. YOu seem to look for studies on the internet without having a whole picture on your head. I will find you prove that I am right 10 thousand times also. You can always find a study that says one time one thing and another time another thing. BUt then you will argue on every little piece of that study. SOrry I am not interested in this at all. I test everything myself in the lab and I dont beileve in any study published on PUBmed, most of them is utter bull**** and did nto match what I tested.
If you like what you are doing with Peat, keep doing it. To me it makes absolutely no sense, I will go my way.
Sorry but I dont have time for this. Just posted here to clarify CO2 situation , if you dont understand how ABGs work , then there is not much to talk is there. It is very easy to learn how ABGs work. ANd how to read them and how to test them and what is Co2 ideal values and how to interpret all these tests.
From my population 80% had high CO2 level in blood not low.
I would advise you to study Ecks work, Peat looks like kindergarden player comparing to Eck/ Eck developed the system 40 years ago which is complete and matches every single type.
Bye , I cant post here anymore
Good luck to you all