Travis
Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 3,189
I think that a missile makes more sense than a Boeing 757, but that a smaller jet makes more more sense yet—Boeing 727-size and smaller. Even a remote-controlled 727 can technically be considered a drone, and missiles with adjustable wings are always more accurate.I don't get paid anything. How much do you get paid?
The "flyover–bomb" might seem plausible, but the damage looks more like an 'in-hole.'
Here is a compilation of hundreds of eyewitness accounts. They are contradictory. The official version is that a large Boeing 757 was responsible, but three separate witnesses explicitly state that it was the much smaller Boeing 737—ven smaller than the Boeing 727. One of them was an aviator, one was a marine, and one was a mortgage broker. Keep in mind that they worked very close to the Ronald Reagan National Airport so many were familiar with airliners.
But there are two reports of a "sonic boom," among other things . . .
Staff Sgt Chris Braman: The lawn was littered with twisted pieces of aluminum. He saw one chunk painted with the letter ``A,'' another with a ``C.'' It didn't occur to Braman what the letters signified until a man in the crowd stooped to pick up one of the smaller metal shards. He examined it for a moment, then announced: ``This was a jet.''
Yeah. You can see molten iron pouring-out some of the windows minutes before it had collapsed. Perhaps they had saved the inner beams for last because explosions here—near the elevator core—would have been less audible from the outside.But he thought it might have just been used to weaken the beams before the final blow. So what was the final blow?
There is no evidence for anything besides thermite. I have poured-over many of the dust samples—and even gas samples—taken from ground zero and environs and could not find any primary explosives. These are easy to recognize because they nearly all have nitrogen heterocyles with nitro groups attached.
But you wouldn't really expect them to be detectable even in they had been used. Nobody seems to be able to say with any certainly what else was used. I'm pretty sure Dr. Niels Harrit is open to the idea of other explosives.
Last edited: