+1Even Ray is not advising anywhere to follow a low fat diet.
I agree that extreme diets that exclude basic macronutrients can have their risks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
+1Even Ray is not advising anywhere to follow a low fat diet.
let mention to all the new people here that reads this:
@tca300 has developed serieus food allergy's on this low fat diet style.
Fed Up Of Food Intolerances!
And @JanP has ruined his gallbladder.
Have Ruined My Gallbladder By Low Fat Diet, Now I Can't Get Back To Eating Fat
Also @Zachs got health complications on this extreme diet and he is start eating high fat diet again.
What i have done to cure hypo and stay lean.
So let everybody warn that this 30+ day low fat diet for depletion PUFA is certainly not without risk.
Even Ray is not advising anywhere to follow a low fat diet.
Maybe some high fat refeed every 10 day or so to give the body some fatty acids to recover is a more wiser idea (?)
I'm glad other people can learn from my mistakes, but to be fair, I have been eating like that for almost a year before my problems started. It doesn't happened in one month.let mention to all the new people here that reads this:
@tca300 has developed serieus food allergy's on this low fat diet style.
Fed Up Of Food Intolerances!
And @JanP has ruined his gallbladder.
Have Ruined My Gallbladder By Low Fat Diet, Now I Can't Get Back To Eating Fat
Also @Zachs got health complications on this extreme diet and he is start eating high fat diet again.
What i have done to cure hypo and stay lean.
So let everybody warn that this 30+ day low fat diet for depletion PUFA is certainly not without risk.
Even Ray is not advising anywhere to follow a low fat diet.
Maybe some high fat refeed every 10 day or so to give the body some fatty acids to recover is a more wiser idea (?)
a whole year? I can't imagine that, low fat is so tasteless.I'm glad other people can learn from my mistakes, but to be fair, I have been eating like that for almost a year before my problems started. It doesn't happened in one month.
Having one meal a day with at least 10 grams of 12+ chain length fats will maximally stimulate bile secretion and prevent the low fat diet induced gallstones.let mention to all the new people here that reads this:
@tca300 has developed serieus food allergy's on this low fat diet style.
Fed Up Of Food Intolerances!
And @JanP has ruined his gallbladder.
Have Ruined My Gallbladder By Low Fat Diet, Now I Can't Get Back To Eating Fat
Also @Zachs got health complications on this extreme diet and he is start eating high fat diet again.
What i have done to cure hypo and stay lean.
So let everybody warn that this 30+ day low fat diet for depletion PUFA is certainly not without risk.
Even Ray is not advising anywhere to follow a low fat diet.
Maybe some high fat refeed every 10 day or so to give the body some fatty acids to recover is a more wiser idea (?)
Having one meal a day with at least 10 grams of 12+ chain length fats will maximally stimulate bile secretion and prevent the low fat diet induced gallstones.
The role of gallbladder emptying in gallstone formation during diet-induced rapid weight loss. - PubMed - NCBI
I think coconut oil is a little over 85% 12+ fatty acids lengths and butter is about 90%. 1 tablespoon in a sitting of either should be enough.So that's like 1 tablespoon of coconut oil or 2 tablespoons of butter?
Biologically, I always thought that there was no need for dietary fat, but through personal n=1 experience, I have always found a small amount of fat necessary to keep digestion working well.
I will say that going 0 fat cleared my skin up very well.
Haidut was sharing the study, leaving it open for discussion and possible additional interpretations—just as you offered up. He wasn’t claiming to be absolutely correct on it:This is not what the study said, and it worries me that everyone in this thread has just jumped on your interpretation as if it's the correct one...If you guys think something sounds wrong, read the damn study. Haidut is human, too.
I would appreciate it if someone else reads the study as well and tells me if I am reading this right. If this study is correct...
Yes I'm aware, hence why I directed the post at the community, not Haidut. No need to take everything personal brother, just imagine everyone's posting with a big smile.Haidut was sharing the study, leaving it open for discussion and possible additional interpretations—just as you offered up. He wasn’t claiming to be absolutely correct on it:
What would you say is "low fat"? Under 20g daily?Well, it didn't seem to affect the monkeys that badly otherwise the study would have mentioned something. Also, taking taurine and vitamin E greatly reduces the oxidative PUFA poisons, and vitamin E may even saturate some of the PUFAs before they are burned by the cells, thus reducing damage even further.
I am just not sure Peat's way of depleting them slowly is practical for everybody. He says that stored PUFA is more or less safe and with time the liver with glucuronidate them out of the body. The problem is, virtually everybody is oxidizing PUFAs all the time due to inefficient metabolism, low glycogen, chronic conditions, stress, exercise, etc. Taking niacinamide and aspirin may help but then again many people cannot take aspirin for various reasons. Long story short - I think that for SOME people who are burning PUFA anyways it may be better to just eat a fat-free diet for 30 days and be done with it.
Also, I am not sure the monkeys were forced to flush their PUFA into the blood stream. They ate enough sugar to prevent adrenalin from rising, so it must be their muscles burning the PUFA at high speed while on a fat-free diet.
Peat mentioned that the guy who went on a fat-free milk and orange juice diet experienced significant weight loss and it was not muscle loss but fat. So, I think it's worth a try to do very low fat diet for a month. Note that the monkeys were not exercising, otherwise it would have been mentioned. The PUFA were burned through normal metabolism, not stress and adrenalin.
Just my 2c.
What would you say is "low fat"? Under 20g daily?
FYI, here is the "Guy" Peat mentioned:
You can read the exact details and results of the experiment. I asked Dr. Peat once if it was practical to try the Burr experiment diet on myself - he said yes, just use OJ instead of the sucrose and coconut oil instead of mineral oil. So there should be no issue with burning off the PUFA over 30 days.
Just as an aside, I found this article on the same site justifying the essentially of PUFA's based and the same Burr experiment - insane!
Slow Discovery of the Importance of ω3 Essential Fatty Acids in Human Health
is it me or is "pufa depletion" just a other word for fat loss here on this forum?
Because i don't see the difference.
1) On a fat-free diet, PUFA depletion in serum and cholesterol was daramatic and it took about 4 days to almost fully deplete PUFA.
2) In various tissues like muscle, skin and testis, PUFA depletion was slower, but still after ONLY 31 days the PUFA depletion in tissues reached the depletion levels seen in serum and cholesterol. As far as I can see PUFA levels fell to under 5% concentration in tissues. Again, this was achieved when feeding fat-free diet.
3) Perhaps the most important, and depressing finding - even a single high PUFA meal replenished PUFA content in serum, cholesterol and tissues almost up to the levels seen before starting fat-free diets. So, after depleting PUFA make sure to avoid even a single "binge event" of restaurant food unless you are loaded up on vitamin E.
I still have a problem that after PUFA depletion, one meal can reinstate what could have been decades of PUFA consumption in tissues?
This is not what the study said, and it worries me that everyone in this thread has just jumped on your interpretation as if it's the correct one.
So the high PFA meal changed serum numbers but not tissue numbers. Makes a lot of sense. If you guys think something sounds wrong, read the damn study. Haidut is human, too.
Another note on this thing: what carbohydrates were the monkeys eating? Pure fructose? Sucrose? Starch? Doesn't say in the study, but it seems like it'd be important.
Edit: looks like it was sucrose! EXPERIMENTAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN CEBUS MONKEYS (gives some background as to the monkeys' environment)
will you elaborate a little on this, I remember hearing that one meal once in a while isn't too harmful, but would like to know how / why?It doesn't-