Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Why would someone consistently seek novelty? Do you think it reflects some biological or psychological impulse? is novelty seeking really just a way to get out of a stressful situation? The novelty is perceived as a relief in comparison to the situation...? I’m just thinking about people who live in different cities and move around really often and I feel like the stress of staying in one place has always bothered me, this feeling of my life not “going anywhere” — so what is that about?Some of these people live in nursing homes. Some live on their own until near or at death. But the common thread is the predictability and stability in their life.
I think some stress is useful, from occasional travel. But most advice for novelty, for instance, to get a “varied diet” for instance is just dead wrong.
Novelty is stressed in our society but it is very stressful and doesn’t contribute to a long life.
How did you make yourself content and more adaptive? Was it finding the ideal environment, or changing something within?Seeking novelty = survival mechanism.
If you are unhappy in your situation and can't adapt to your environment you seek something new. May have something to do with our nomad ancestors. Possibly dopamine plays a role.
I see a similar effect with myself in the past and people around me who aren't content with their life. Especially with buying addiction, collecting (shoes, toys).
That makes sense. Thank you.I think the biggest change for me was having goals again in life. Getting over anhedonia caused by serotonin excess, being able to enjoy things again I enjoyed as a kid. My buying addiction vasnished when I got my health back on track.
Also Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. When one of the pillars is lacking I tend to fall back a bit.
As far as my living situation in the city I'm still looking for a different place mainly because of the street noise that is disrupting my sleep. I try to reframe these noises as something positive in the sense of security a city gives. For example 24/7 access to everything I need. Definitely makes a difference for me.
What about you? Can you put a needle on what it is exactly that you are trying to escape or change?
Literally zero proof of this statement. And it makes no sense whatsoever. People who live the longest are most likely the best at maintaining themselves. Even the best designed car in the world won't last if you crash it into a wall the first day, or never change the oil. While I think the human body is far more complex than a car, you can easily destroy a human body with poor maintenance as well.
I n
You also have zero proof that it's their diet. I have watched documentaries many people who have lived over 100 including my grandfather and great uncle. These people's diets vary a lot and many of them eat what we would consider bad foods daily and smoke daily. Like I said, it's genes.
Now that doesn't mean you can't prolong your life through healthy living, but reaching 100+ is mostly genes.
Yes and that's genes. They are naturally easy going, have low anxiety disposition. They don't get sick much nor have food intolerance. Then you have us on these sites who are the opposites. We need to watch our foods and diets. We were not lucky enough.Or maybe personality. I've noticed long-lived people tend to have very little generalized anxiety & insecurity. They are usually open and internally calm (no matter how extroverted they may be on the outside), with no defensiveness.
Yes and that's genes. They are naturally easy going, low anxiety.
parts of your personality depend on parents but it's not all just genetic, especially once you know that high serotonin/oxygen is related to anxiety and doing things to increase progesterone will reduce it. n=1 but my personality has changed a lot since Peating.
Lol okay, can you point me to those " good genes"? Or maybe to some "bad" genes? You're just saying extremely theoretical non- sense here.Yes and that's genes. They are naturally easy going, have low anxiety disposition. They don't get sick much nor have food intolerance. Then you have us on these sites who are the opposites. We need to watch our foods and diets. We were not lucky enough.
Lol okay, can you point me to those " good genes"? Or maybe to some "bad" genes? You're just saying extremely theoretical non- sense here.
Smoking is really common among centenarians, and it has been shown to reduce stress. Less stress means longer life.I n
You also have zero proof that it's their diet. I have watched documentaries many people who have lived over 100 including my grandfather and great uncle. These people's diets vary a lot and many of them eat what we would consider bad foods daily and smoke daily. Like I said, it's genes.
Now that doesn't mean you can't prolong your life through healthy living, but reaching 100+ is mostly genes.
You also have zero proof that it's their diet. I have watched documentaries many people who have lived over 100 including my grandfather and great uncle. These people's diets vary a lot and many of them eat what we would consider bad foods daily and smoke daily. Like I said, it's genes.
Now that doesn't mean you can't prolong your life through healthy living, but reaching 100+ is mostly genes.
Nope, my ancestors before my parents's generation were healthy. Nothing to do with " curse" or "blessing", which are very common topics in the neo- darwinist view you're espousing. I'm unhealthy due to the terrible environment I was exposed to during all my life almost. Using your logic, I and many others on this forum would be dead, since it's genes that dictate it all. I clearly changed things around by improving my environment, as did many others here.If you had good health genes, you wouldn't be on this site.
Nope, my ancestors before my parents's generation were healthy. Nothing to do with " curse" or "blessing", which are very common topics in the neo- darwinist view you're espousing. I'm unhealthy due to the terrible environment I was exposed to during all my life almost. Using your logic, I and many others on this forum would be dead, since it's genes that dictate it all. I clearly changed things around by improving my environment, as did many others here.
What proof do you have it's genes? Why do people who have little contact with the modern world are so healthy? Why do they get sick after moving to cities and eating crap? And I'm talking about indigenous people who go from their home to modern environments. It's well known that they get sick in one generation.
You have no proof that it's genes, meanwhile this forum and other sites have tons of information on how the environment can and will cause adaptive changes, for better or for worse.
If you were a little more diligent on reading Ray's articles, you wouldn't be spouting things that clearly are unfounded.
Nope, my ancestors before my parents's generation were healthy. Nothing to do with " curse" or "blessing", which are very common topics in the neo- darwinist view you're espousing. I'm unhealthy due to the terrible environment I was exposed to during all my life almost. Using your logic, I and many others on this forum would be dead, since it's genes that dictate it all. I clearly changed things around by improving my environment, as did many others here.
What proof do you have it's genes? Why do people who have little contact with the modern world are so healthy? Why do they get sick after moving to cities and eating crap? And I'm talking about indigenous people who go from their home to modern environments. It's well known that they get sick in one generation.
You have no proof that it's genes, meanwhile this forum and other sites have tons of information on how the environment can and will cause adaptive changes, for better or for worse.
If you were a little more diligent on reading Ray's articles, you wouldn't be spouting things that clearly are unfounded.