Drareg
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,772
https://unherd.com/2020/04/which-epidemiologist-do-you-believe/
Good article, good points made, my only issue is he shy’s away from addressing Ferguson’s past predictions which are failures, he does allude however to Ferguson’s ego in a matter of words, I don’t think he wants to be too critical just yet as he would want Ferguson back on again.
The author forgets as pointed out in the video interview by Johan Giesecke is that many of Ferguson’s ideas have never been tested in the field.
"Whether you’re more Giesecke or Ferguson, it’s time to stop pretending that our response to this threat is simply a scientific question, or even an easy moral choice between right and wrong. It’s a question of what sort of world we want to live in, and at what cost."
I don’t agree with the above statement entirely ,it presupposes that Ferguson’s science is legit, it’s more human written algorithms proven wrong in the past, even thinking about what they are doing now if the data for covid infections is been tampered with it means the future models will be even more incoherent with reality.
The last line is a gem, it’s biological personas at war here, all colors of that biological spectrum in the "peaty" sense, the defeated personas,depressed,psychotic,low thyroid,high estrogen etc
Now if we can just get an interviewer to ask bill gates why the public should trust him with medical treatments for their kids when Bill was friends with Jeffrey Epstein the child sex trafficker, this is a legitimate question that needs to be asked.
Which epidemiologist do you believe? - UnHerd
Good article, good points made, my only issue is he shy’s away from addressing Ferguson’s past predictions which are failures, he does allude however to Ferguson’s ego in a matter of words, I don’t think he wants to be too critical just yet as he would want Ferguson back on again.
The author forgets as pointed out in the video interview by Johan Giesecke is that many of Ferguson’s ideas have never been tested in the field.
"Whether you’re more Giesecke or Ferguson, it’s time to stop pretending that our response to this threat is simply a scientific question, or even an easy moral choice between right and wrong. It’s a question of what sort of world we want to live in, and at what cost."
I don’t agree with the above statement entirely ,it presupposes that Ferguson’s science is legit, it’s more human written algorithms proven wrong in the past, even thinking about what they are doing now if the data for covid infections is been tampered with it means the future models will be even more incoherent with reality.
The last line is a gem, it’s biological personas at war here, all colors of that biological spectrum in the "peaty" sense, the defeated personas,depressed,psychotic,low thyroid,high estrogen etc
Now if we can just get an interviewer to ask bill gates why the public should trust him with medical treatments for their kids when Bill was friends with Jeffrey Epstein the child sex trafficker, this is a legitimate question that needs to be asked.
Which epidemiologist do you believe? - UnHerd