Drareg
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,772
This is interesting, as we know Giesecke was involved with the Swedish approach to covid 19, he was ridiculed by the doomsday MSM.
It’s important to keep a critical eye on this, the second biggest funder of the WHO is bill Epstein gates, the organization clearly has a conflict of interest and has no credibility.
What gates and his fellow technocrats want is tracking ,vaccines and covid passes, it’s the first step for biometric identification , I don’t think giesecke would oppose this, there is a potential he was signed up to return credibility to the WHO, if giesecke is advocating for the above tech it must be good will be the perception , the public see him as the wise one who didn’t lockdown Sweden or encourage mask wearing, it creates trust.
Until Bill Epstein gates and the gates foundation is removed from all matters of health and media the organizations receiving funding have no credibility, Bill Gates is friends with child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, Gates scientific advisor was the executor of Epstein’s will, bill cares about your kids, sure bill.
Johan Giesecke gets new role at WHO - The Post
Swedish epidemiologist Johan Giesecke’s interview with UnHerd made waves around the world when, at the height of the Covid-19 crisis in April, he made the case for why lockdowns were not the answer.
He has now been promoted to a more senior advisory role within the World Health Organisation, as Vice-Chair of the Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Infectious Hazards, which advises the Director-General on the response to pandemics.
“It’s a group of thirteen scientists from all around the world. Usually we meet twice a year in Geneva but since Covid-19 we’ve been meeting once a week by telephone,” he tells me down the line from Stockholm.
The London-based Chair, David Heymann, who Dr Giesecke describes as “one of the world’s best known infectious disease fighters”, has other commitments across the WHO and Dr Giesecke will lead the group in his absence.
He was voted in as the new Vice-Chair by the other members.
I asked him if he regards his election as a sign that epidemiologists around the world were looking more towards the Swedish response to Covid-19 as a model.
“I don’t think it’s a political statement, no,” he said. “I think they like my experience.”
He repeats his customary advice that it is too early to make those kinds of comparisons anyway. “You should wait one year or maybe five years before comparing strategies. We still have a long way to go in this pandemic.”
He agreed that the tone of media coverage about Sweden had has become noticeably more positive since we spoke in April.
“Back then they thought we were crazy,” he said.
It’s important to keep a critical eye on this, the second biggest funder of the WHO is bill Epstein gates, the organization clearly has a conflict of interest and has no credibility.
What gates and his fellow technocrats want is tracking ,vaccines and covid passes, it’s the first step for biometric identification , I don’t think giesecke would oppose this, there is a potential he was signed up to return credibility to the WHO, if giesecke is advocating for the above tech it must be good will be the perception , the public see him as the wise one who didn’t lockdown Sweden or encourage mask wearing, it creates trust.
Until Bill Epstein gates and the gates foundation is removed from all matters of health and media the organizations receiving funding have no credibility, Bill Gates is friends with child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, Gates scientific advisor was the executor of Epstein’s will, bill cares about your kids, sure bill.
Johan Giesecke gets new role at WHO - The Post
Swedish epidemiologist Johan Giesecke’s interview with UnHerd made waves around the world when, at the height of the Covid-19 crisis in April, he made the case for why lockdowns were not the answer.
He has now been promoted to a more senior advisory role within the World Health Organisation, as Vice-Chair of the Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Infectious Hazards, which advises the Director-General on the response to pandemics.
“It’s a group of thirteen scientists from all around the world. Usually we meet twice a year in Geneva but since Covid-19 we’ve been meeting once a week by telephone,” he tells me down the line from Stockholm.
The London-based Chair, David Heymann, who Dr Giesecke describes as “one of the world’s best known infectious disease fighters”, has other commitments across the WHO and Dr Giesecke will lead the group in his absence.
He was voted in as the new Vice-Chair by the other members.
I asked him if he regards his election as a sign that epidemiologists around the world were looking more towards the Swedish response to Covid-19 as a model.
“I don’t think it’s a political statement, no,” he said. “I think they like my experience.”
He repeats his customary advice that it is too early to make those kinds of comparisons anyway. “You should wait one year or maybe five years before comparing strategies. We still have a long way to go in this pandemic.”
He agreed that the tone of media coverage about Sweden had has become noticeably more positive since we spoke in April.
“Back then they thought we were crazy,” he said.
