It is first worth noting the following:
Humans are the only species that experience "Male Pattern Baldness" - there is not any other animal species (let alone mammalian species) that has the males of that species experience rampant hair loss:
It makes absolutely no sense why males of a mammalian species would be suffering so much from hair loss. it defies all logic
The only instances I have ever seen of a mammal experiencing hair loss is in the context of stress:
Have you ever seen a video of a bald chimp in the wild ? Me neither. But I've seen plenty of videos of chimps thrown in zoos going bald
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSjcJv-eLxM&ab_channel=RumbleViral
Bears in zoos (females mind you) go rampantly bald - Have you ever seen a bear in the wild look like this ? Me neither. But you can find bears looking like this in zoos:
www.belgraviacentre.com
Now as for people:
DHT is blamed, "genetics" is blamed
How is this DHT theory taken seriously ? A hormone so vital to the survival of males in every mammalian species makes them look unhealthy ?
And then what about homeless men ? They defy all hair loss industry logic
They tend to have higher DHT than your average civilian men by definition due to the mere fact they don't wash their skin and the average man disturbs this vital androgenic organ on a regular basis - the homeless men don't follow any hair protocol ever recommended by hair restoration clinics yet they tend to have some of the thickest hair I've ever seen:
And Native American Men ? Also really good hair and they ate a lot of red meat and drank a lot of milk, they sat by the fireplace and lived in the wild - by all standards their way of living should've made their DHT quiet high yet the males had really good hair
How does the hair loss industry explain this ?
And Genetics? - Are these same genetics that make a man immune to hair loss make them homeless as well ? Seems very coincidental that the vast majority of homeless men have good "hair genetics"
And then it is also worth noting the next points:
www.theatlantic.com
"In male pattern balding, hair follicles actually shrink; they don't disappear. The hairs are essentially microscopic on the bald part of the scalp compared to other spots."
"Although bald areas had the same number of hair-making stem cells as normal scalp, there were fewer of a more mature type, called the progenitor cell. This difference means that hair follicles in bald patches shrink rather than disappear and the new hairs made are microscopic compared to normal hair."
"Often confused with adult stem cells, progenitor cells are early descendants of stem cells that can differentiate to form one or more kinds of cells"
And progenitor cells seem to be controlled by metabolism as with every other health issue discussed on this forum
www.frontiersin.org
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
There seems to be nothing stopping a bald man from regrowing a full head of hair. All of his hair cells are still there except miniaturized - waiting for new stem cells originating from a healthy metabolism to bring them back to their vibrant thickness
Homeless men don't go bald.
Women don't go bald.
Native American Men didn't go bald last century.
But hair loss is a CRISIS on the average male in society.
what they all had/have in common that the average male in society doesn't ?
Long hair - probably because long hair makes a huge difference on metabolism that no one wants to admit.
Humans are the only species that experience "Male Pattern Baldness" - there is not any other animal species (let alone mammalian species) that has the males of that species experience rampant hair loss:
It makes absolutely no sense why males of a mammalian species would be suffering so much from hair loss. it defies all logic
The only instances I have ever seen of a mammal experiencing hair loss is in the context of stress:
Have you ever seen a video of a bald chimp in the wild ? Me neither. But I've seen plenty of videos of chimps thrown in zoos going bald
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSjcJv-eLxM&ab_channel=RumbleViral
Twycross Zoo's hairless chimp Mongo dies 'unexpectedly'
Twycross Zoo's hairless chimpanzee that became an internet hit after an online film of a "fight" was viewed millions of times dies suddenly.
www.bbc.com
Bears in zoos (females mind you) go rampantly bald - Have you ever seen a bear in the wild look like this ? Me neither. But you can find bears looking like this in zoos:
Hair Loss in Animals: Bears in Zoo Go Bald
All the female bears in a zoo in Germany have gone bald Find out how humans can prevent hair loss and avoid looking like these wrinkly bears
Now as for people:
DHT is blamed, "genetics" is blamed
How is this DHT theory taken seriously ? A hormone so vital to the survival of males in every mammalian species makes them look unhealthy ?
And then what about homeless men ? They defy all hair loss industry logic
They tend to have higher DHT than your average civilian men by definition due to the mere fact they don't wash their skin and the average man disturbs this vital androgenic organ on a regular basis - the homeless men don't follow any hair protocol ever recommended by hair restoration clinics yet they tend to have some of the thickest hair I've ever seen:
And Native American Men ? Also really good hair and they ate a lot of red meat and drank a lot of milk, they sat by the fireplace and lived in the wild - by all standards their way of living should've made their DHT quiet high yet the males had really good hair
How does the hair loss industry explain this ?
And Genetics? - Are these same genetics that make a man immune to hair loss make them homeless as well ? Seems very coincidental that the vast majority of homeless men have good "hair genetics"
And then it is also worth noting the next points:
Science Reveals the Secret of Baldness
You're not bald, you just have invisible hair
"In male pattern balding, hair follicles actually shrink; they don't disappear. The hairs are essentially microscopic on the bald part of the scalp compared to other spots."
"Although bald areas had the same number of hair-making stem cells as normal scalp, there were fewer of a more mature type, called the progenitor cell. This difference means that hair follicles in bald patches shrink rather than disappear and the new hairs made are microscopic compared to normal hair."
"Often confused with adult stem cells, progenitor cells are early descendants of stem cells that can differentiate to form one or more kinds of cells"
And progenitor cells seem to be controlled by metabolism as with every other health issue discussed on this forum
Energy Metabolism Regulates Stem Cell Pluripotency
Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) are characterized by their unique capacity for both unlimited self-renewal and their potential to differentiate to all cell lineages contained within the three primary germ layers. While once considered a distinct cellular state, it is becoming clear that...
Metabolism of Stem and Progenitor Cells: Proper Methods to Answer Specific Questions
Stem cells can stay quiescent for a long period of time or proliferate and differentiate into multiple lineages. The activity of stage-specific metabolic programs allows stem cells to best adapt their functions in different microenvironments. Specific ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
There seems to be nothing stopping a bald man from regrowing a full head of hair. All of his hair cells are still there except miniaturized - waiting for new stem cells originating from a healthy metabolism to bring them back to their vibrant thickness
Homeless men don't go bald.
Women don't go bald.
Native American Men didn't go bald last century.
But hair loss is a CRISIS on the average male in society.
what they all had/have in common that the average male in society doesn't ?
Long hair - probably because long hair makes a huge difference on metabolism that no one wants to admit.
Hair is vital to every mammalian species that grows it (in males and females)
People like to think that Humans operate on a totally different realm than any other mammalian species that has ever existed and people here want to pretend that its normal for a species to have one sex demonstrating rampant hair loss when
Hair loss has ALWAYS been a stress reaction in every other mammalian species
Metabolism is not just food and supplements - we have to ask ourselves why women and these male groups are so immune to hair loss and what they have in common that the average male is not doing
