MetabolicTrash
Member
Wouldn't that just be wasted effort at this point? I mean it could be like me telling someone that some liver is likely better for you on occasion vs. PUFA snacks, but they can always just turn around and say, "But I like PUFA snacks better so that is what I choose to eat." Unfortunately it becomes pointless to pick a side because all sides can be right and wrong -- it just might depend on the circumstances of life that drive one or veer one toward 'X' more than 'Y' and so on, either cautiously or out of whatever desires/needs one has.
For example, if PUFA is so bad then why would some seek it out and consume it? Ignorance? Who says? Some even here stand by some PUFA support; are more anti-thyroid use/hormones/etc.; and some members also support mask mandates and vaccines too I think. Why even argue? I have had these discussions before and it is just pointless most of the time.
Even someone like Ray or Ling could not convince some people against some mainstream concepts regarding science and health and so on because some will always refuse to believe differently for various reasons -- and forcing one to accept something is also pointless too.
Plus it would possibly be easier to convince a stranger of something than your own family, however ironic.
For example, if PUFA is so bad then why would some seek it out and consume it? Ignorance? Who says? Some even here stand by some PUFA support; are more anti-thyroid use/hormones/etc.; and some members also support mask mandates and vaccines too I think. Why even argue? I have had these discussions before and it is just pointless most of the time.
Even someone like Ray or Ling could not convince some people against some mainstream concepts regarding science and health and so on because some will always refuse to believe differently for various reasons -- and forcing one to accept something is also pointless too.
Plus it would possibly be easier to convince a stranger of something than your own family, however ironic.
Last edited: