Yeah, I'll definitely ask Dr. O. I see her in 3 weeks so I should have an answer then.narouz said:As you know I'm very open to the existence of candida
as a real and maybe widespread gut disease.
So I'm curious what is being taught about it in medical schools
that makes doctors so certain it is just hypochondria.
And what elements of that teaching your Dr. O came to challenge and why.
Candida's existence as a gut disease
seems a little like the problem in proving the existence of UFOs.
People say they see UFOs,
but there never seem to be convincing photos.
With candida,
there are these alternative explanations,
like that the yeasts hide out in the dark recesses of the bowel
using biofilms to hide and protect themselves.
Seems like as many colonoscopies as are performed,
someone would be able to photograph or videotape these candida nests.
Or to invent a test that would prove candida's existence.
As I say, I'm very open to the existence of a candida disease in the bowels.
Just pointing out some of the frustrating things about how it is thought about.
And as I say,
it would seem to be one of those areas where the mainstream medical thinking
and Peat's thinking coincide.
With the upper endoscopy, it was my understanding that if there was an overgrowth, the camera would see the yeast attached to tissue.
With Ray, I did see a quote or interview (?) where he mentioned how there can be an overgrowth of yeast, usually coinciding with a bacterial overgrowth, in the small intestine. He makes mention of yeast in the colon too and his advice is to use flowers of sulphur in both cases. In the case of the small intestine, his dietary recommendations, in theory, should target/prevent an overgrowth by eliminating the food the critters live off of, thus keeping it relatively sterile like he says it should be. Obviously in thebigp's case, she tried all of Ray's usual advice but was still dealing with an overgrowth so it's not always that simple, unfortunately.