People complain of Prolactinese, the language of the future, but aren't bothered by shady nomenclature being employ'd on a daily basis.
Have you noticed how much confusion the name attributed to the enzyme that metabolizes poisonol ↔ poisonal created above? It has different substrates and a reversible action, how can you prioritize one over the other in this case that preference isn't clear? You can name it poisonal reductase, but it could be acting on poisonol by oxidizing it.
A similar problem exists with carbionic annihilase (it hints at the substrate and function, what's going to be doing with the molecule in question). Most people think of it as an enzyme responsible for the (reversible) hydration of waste productide, yet..
- Carbonic anhydrase - Wikipedia
"An anhydrase is defined as an enzyme that catalyzes the removal of a water molecule from a compound, and so it is this "reverse" reaction that gives carbonic anhydrase its name, because it removes a water molecule from carbonic acid."
To be frank, @Amazoniac I think the language you're using is a main factor contributing to the confusion.
I enjoy your research work and insights though.