CNN: Covid-19 Death Rate Is Under 1% For Everyone But People Over 70

[burtlancast]

it’s regularly stated at Davos and the usual elite meet ups that we need less democracy now for more democracy later.

So, according to you, we live in a democracy at this moment ?

 

[not_James_Bond]

So, according to you, we live in a democracy at this moment ?

@burtlancast Please can you elucidate this further

 

[Hugh Johnson]

Death rate in Sweden. also seems unaffected by COVID-19. In lockdown countries it is probably higher than usual.

 

[burtlancast]

@burtlancast Please can you elucidate this further

The system in place throughout the whole world (with a slight variation in the USA, where voting isn't mandatory, but where the same principle applies too) is if you reckon none of the candidates are any good, you vote blank (for no one).

If more than 50% of the people vote blank, and if people's voice is truly represented, the system of representative democracy is deemed without any quality of representation, since none of the candidates are liked by the majority.

And thus to keep up with the right of representation of the people, the system of representative democracy should logically revert to the old system of direct democracy , where it's the people themselves who make the laws instead of the politicians (which could be easily implemented through the internet; i believe it's called e-democracy).

But that would mean politicians would be out of a job.

So, nobody utters the word "direct democracy", in any shape or form.

And that includes all the so called opposition, and all it's sundry derivatives.

The people who invented representative democracy, centuries ago, rigged the system right from the start and refused to take into account the blank vote, even though they claimed they wanted the people to be represented, so they would always be dependent of politicians, which then could be either easily intimidated or bribed at will.

This is the basic essence of what Carroll Quigley wrote about, but none of those citing Quigley (all the so called opposition, right wing, etc) will never utter the word "direct democracy" as a solution because they secretly want to keep the status quo when it comes to the representative democracy racket.

So they will offer disillusioned people to join their own organization (John Byrch, Freedom Force international of Edward Griffin, etc) as a false solution, which of course perpetuates the racket; once they join, all that's left to accomplish is to destroy the organization from within (the fish rots by the head).

I believe that was the fate of the Byrch organisation; Alan Stang, a former member, wrote about it on a hushed tone years ago. The people who naively joined were identified and marked for life ever after.

This is how the game is played.

So, for me i always have a good laugh when i read people think we're in a democracy.

 

[not_James_Bond]

The system in place throughout the whole world (with a slight variation in the USA, where voting isn't mandatory, but where the same principle applies too) is if you reckon none of the candidates are any good, you vote blank (for no one).

If more than 50% of the people vote blank, and if people's voice is truly represented, the system of representative democracy is deemed without any quality of representation, since none of the candidates are liked by the majority.

And thus to keep up with the right of representation of the people, the system of representative democracy should logically revert to the old system of direct democracy , where it's the people themselves who make the laws instead of the politicians (which could be easily implemented through the internet; i believe it's called e-democracy).

But that would mean politicians would be out of a job.

So, nobody utters the word "direct democracy", in any shape or form.

And that includes all the so called opposition, and all it's sundry derivatives.

The people who invented representative democracy, centuries ago, rigged the system right from the start and refused to take into account the blank vote, even though they claimed they wanted the people to be represented, so they would always be dependent of politicians, which then could be either easily intimidated or bribed at will.

This is the basic essence of what Carroll Quigley wrote about, but none of those citing Quigley (all the so called opposition, right wing, etc) will never utter the word "direct democracy" as a solution because they secretly want to keep the status quo when it comes to the representative democracy racket.

So they will offer disillusioned people to join their own organization (John Byrch, Freedom Force international of Edward Griffin, etc) as a false solution, which of course perpetuates the racket; once they join, all that's left to accomplish is to destroy the organization from within (the fish rots by the head).

I believe that was the fate of the Byrch organisation; Alan Stang, a former member, wrote about it on a hushed tone years ago. The people who naively joined were identified and marked for life ever after.

This is how the game is played.

So, for me i always have a good laugh when i read people think we're in a democracy.

@burtlancast Interesting, and thank you

 

[Lejeboca]

But the GPMB document (board member Fauci) said the first one is a simulation and the second one lethal. So they might hit us with anthrax before we rise up and mount legal defenses.

Corona Brucella: The Next Wave of COVID? - Vaxxter

Cook your food thoroughly. No frozen foods. [Just in case.]

 

[burtlancast]

And that includes all the so called opposition, and all it's sundry derivatives.

The people who invented representative democracy, centuries ago, rigged the system right from the start and refused to take into account the blank vote, even though they claimed they wanted the people to be represented, so they would always be dependent of politicians, which then could be either easily intimidated or bribed at will.

This is the basic essence of what Carroll Quigley wrote about, but none of those citing Quigley (all the so called opposition, right wing, etc) will never utter the word "direct democracy" as a solution because they secretly want to keep the status quo when it comes to the representative democracy racket.

As an example of false opposition offering a non-solution to the representation racket, here's a Tedex talk, where to presenter laments about the problem of money influencing the electing process in the USA and the fact it's difficult for people to become registered voters.

He suggests resolving these 2 problems will equally resolve the representation problem, when actually it will only perpetuate it further.

Should his solution come to pass, the USA will end up in the same situation as the rest of the world (or the UK for example) , where people are so disillusioned with politicians that laws are being created to force them to vote.

 

[not_James_Bond]

As an example of false opposition offering a non-solution to the representation racket, here's a Tedex talk, where to presenter laments about the problem of money influencing the electing process in the USA and the fact it's difficult for people to become registered voters.

He suggests resolving these 2 problems will equally resolve the representation problem, when actually it will only perpetuate it further.

Should his solution come to pass, the USA will end up in the same situation as the rest of the world (or the UK for example) , where people are so disillusioned with politicians that laws are being created to force them to vote.

@burtlancast @Drareg
Here in the UK we have quangos (500+), quangos are filled with appointed members. This means, unlike governmental bodies, members of quangos do not need to seek re-election. This is seen as a major criticism in liberal democracy as members of quangos have not been legitimised by the electorate, but have governmental power and influence. They also do not have the same level of accountability as elected officials, worsened by the lack of media coverage of their work.

What's your take on this?

 

[Regina]

Corona Brucella: The Next Wave of COVID? - Vaxxter

Cook your food thoroughly. No frozen foods. [Just in case.]

Thanks for the article and tip!