Certainly, here are two posts where Ella talks about eating like a king or queen. My takeaway is that living (and eating enough) in a plentiful food environment and consuming many foods rich in vitamin A daily almost guarantees one won't be deficient.Hi @Blossom can you define “eating like a king or queen” for those of us following the thread, but are unclear as to what that points to? Maybe examples? Thank you in advance
He may still have adequate stores in adipose tissue, liver and other organs to see him through for some time. Do we know what fat% he is?
If young white educated females (mean age 22.4) in the US consume > 70% the RDA, then we can expect a male in his 50s, who has been eating fortified foods,
downing supplements like lollies and dining on (as McDougall puts it) foods of kings and queens, to have plenty on board.
Be nice to see his hormone profile as his levels of A & D diminish.
@Kyle Bigman, with a diet rich in animal products these days, no one should be vitamin A deficient unless there are malabsorption issues, pancreatitis, celiac's etc.
Don't forget the animals we eat are already supplemented with vitamin A and then we go and supplement on top of this because we are convinced we are deficient??? I doubt there is a need for the majority of people eating the foods of kings and queens to supplement vitamin A .
We saw with the Kempnar's rice diet, those individuals did exceptionally well, reversing disease conditions, for years on a diet completely devoid of retinol. We are talking here of adult men and women, not children and prepubescent children or young teenagers.
When Vitamin A was my molecule of interest, I was interested in its deficiency in mothers and their children and the changes in the cornea at puberty and the teen years. Times of rapid growth, hormonal changes and stress. The influence of poor food choices restrictive diets and the absence of protective foods.
Wealthy adult men who had access to unlimited food choices and supplementation were never on my horizon - they were not part of my demographics. I am happy Grant has recovered his health but I still feel his problem is to do with testosterone and andropause. It is wrong for him to be scaremongering and cherry picking the literature.
He leaves out so much of the valuable research on Vitamin A and makes one wonder why he has not taken a more balance approach.
Andropause is a time in a man's life when hormonal changes have the greatest impact on health. Now if Grant had developed keratoconus, I would be more interested in his plight. If his symptoms had not reversed, I would be in more fear of Vitamin A toxicity, unlike KC , which is difficult to halt or reverse. I fear more a deficiency in childhood than an excess in adulthood, eating a robust and varied diet. Supplementation is not recommended unless there is justification.
KC occurs in menopausal women although rare, on the pill, HRT, pregnancy etc. but in males who tend to be more predisposed to KC than females before and after the teen years, rarer in andropause. It halts during the 3rd and 4th decade. I have yet to meet a male who developed KC during andropause and would be certainly interested in knowing.
Grant is an engineer and has little appreciation on the biphasic nature of substances. He has problems with the concept that a deficit and a toxic dose can cause the same symptoms. Unfortunately this is a mentality shared on this forum by some (not all) that a tiny bit of a substance, as is found in food, is not as powerful as a lot which is found in supplementing. Not so. A small dose can be even more powerful than a large dose. We have learnt much from the research on endocrine disrupting molecules - a small dose can have very profound effects.
The human body is not a black box in the way engineers view problems. We have not even begun to scratch the surface in understanding its complexity and sophistication. We think we know, but we know ***t compared to the intelligence that exists in each and every cell. Nutritional sciences is in its infancy and we should not be so gun-ho thinking science has it all worked out. Nature may have, but man has a long way to go.
The body is not derelict. It is constantly trying to correct and adapt even though we continue doing stupid things to it.
Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses