Would You Sacrifice Your Smartphone For Your Freedom?

[Peatness]

Smartphones cause hypothyroidism.

Alterations in TSH and Thyroid Hormones following Mobile Phone Use

In recent years, the widespread use of mobile phones has lead to a public debate about possible detrimental effects on human health. In spite of years of research, there is still a great controversy regarding the possibility of induction of any significant ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Great find. Imagine once 5G get rolled out.......

​

 

[Peatness]

Free software — Big Brother Watch

Big Brother Watch exposes and challenges threats to our privacy, our freedoms and our civil liberties at a time of enormous technological change in the UK.

bigbrotherwatch.org.uk

 

[Peatness]

Regime Concentration Camps Being Beta Tested in China​

View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZpJ7iEFkUTc9/

 

[Peatness]

“Generation slave” theme tune


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYTkHQN8iFg

 

[Peatness]

87% of Canadians had their cellphone location data secretly accessed by Public Health Canada to monitor their movement during the pLandemic.


View: https://twitter.com/RebelNewsOnline/status/1482024384340664320

 

[Peatness]

Resist

People urged to use NHS app instead of calling GPs

'The shock of Covid and the urgent need for recovery has brought us to this crossroads right now'

www.inyourarea.co.uk

 

[Grapelander]

Cell Phone In Microwave

 

[J.R.K]

Cell Phone In Microwave

So many ways to interpret this, not necessarily truthful from one viewpoint, also not wrong from another, but nonetheless certainly entertaining!!

 

[Peatness]

View: https://t.me/WeTheMedia/55895


You should stop using iPhones period, they are taking a secret infrared photos of you every 5 seconds.

If they are doing that, they are also recording every sound that enters your mic. If you are a truther, ask yourself what are they doing with that information? Is someone trying to create your social score based on everything you say and do?

Yes, as a matter of fact, if you are using any mainstream social media, and you have been trashing your government, you bet that it is well noted and recorded on some google/apple server, and will be used. The social credit score will be their next step in attempt to control us.

 

[Grapelander]

View: https://t.me/WeTheMedia/55895


You should stop using iPhones period, they are taking a secret infrared photos of you every 5 seconds.

If they are doing that, they are also recording every sound that enters your mic. If you are a truther, ask yourself what are they doing with that information? Is someone trying to create your social score based on everything you say and do?

Yes, as a matter of fact, if you are using any mainstream social media, and you have been trashing your government, you bet that it is well noted and recorded on some google/apple server, and will be used. The social credit score will be their next step in attempt to control us.

It is really weird for me because I grew up before cell phones.
My understanding: it is a crime to tap into someone else's phone call without a warrant. That is exactly how it was 1970's and 1980's.
That is what they said about Linda Tripp taping Clinton:

Tripp Indicted on Charges of Wiretapping
By Saundra Torry and Raja Mishra
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, July 31, 1999; Page A1
After a 13-month investigation, Tripp, 49, who lives in Columbia, was indicted on two counts of violating a rarely used Maryland law that makes it a crime to record telephone conversations without the consent of all parties. Tripp has said she recorded more than two dozen phone conversations with Lewinsky in 1997. She also has said she had been warned during that period that secret taping in Maryland was illegal.

The Wiretap Act (18 U.S. Code § 2511) is a federal law aimed at protecting privacy in communications with other persons. ?
Under the Act, it is illegal to intentionally or purposefully intercept, disclose, or use the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication through the use of a device. The Act provides criminal and civil penalties for violations, although it creates various exceptions to when interceptions and disclosures are illegal.

At some level are we giving consent to all this -or- did the rules change on us?

 

[Grapelander]

Surveillance and Wiretapping
Court originally upheld wiretaps
In Olmstead v. United States (1928), the Supreme Court held that the wiretaps attached by law enforcement to the phone lines of prohibition conspirators, including Roy Olmstead, were constitutional because there had been no physical trespass.

Chief Justice William Howard Taft asserted that a person who connects a phone to lines that extend outside of a home with the intent to project his or her voice outside has no expectation of privacy with regard to the ensuing conversations. However, he argued for judicial restraint when he suggested that Congress could make wiretaps inadmissible by passing legislation prohibiting or regulating their use.

In 1967, Court shifted to protect individual liberties in face of wiretapping
In Katz v. United States (1967), the Court held that the wiretapping of public phone booths for listening to conversations without a warrant, regardless of no physical trespass taking place, was unconstitutional, essentially reversing Olmstead.

Justice Potter Stewart concluded in Katz that “wherever a man may be, he is entitled to know that he will be free.”

These two cases illustrate a shift in the Court’s thinking. In Olmstead the Court showed deference to the state and its efforts to gather evidence of a crime, whereas Katz illustrates a clear move towards greater protection of individual liberties.

Concerns raised about Terrorist Surveillance Program
In October 2001, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13228 — referred to as the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) — that authorized the National Security Administration (NSA) to track communications between individuals abroad and domestic American suspects.

It was not until December 2005 that the existence of the program was exposed by the New York Times. An article in the newspaper stated that the program was targeting U.S. citizens and was being conducted without a judicially authorized warrant.

NSA surveillance program creates First Amendment concerns
First Amendment concerns emerge when the NSA eavesdropping program utilizes data-mining operations in the organization’s search for terrorists. The random collection of information from land-line calls, cell phones, and e-mail creates uneasiness about the limits of government surveillance of citizens.

The Supreme Court has previously held that listening to conversations of U.S. citizens without a warrant is unconstitutional and violates core principles of the Bill of Rights, and the Fourth Amendment regulates the ability of the government to infringe upon a citizen’s First Amendment right to free speech as well as the privacy of that speech.

Ruling that wiretapping without warrants violates First Amendment was vacated by 6th Circuit
On August 17, 2006, in American Civil Liberties Union v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service (E.D.Mich.), U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor issued an injunction against the Bush administration and the NSA and ordered the TSP be discontinued.

The court held that the TSP violated “the Separation of Powers doctrine; the First and Fourth Amendments of the United States Constitution and the statutory law.”

The ACLU argued that the wiretapping violated its and its clients' right to free speech in their communication with people outside of the United States.

The injunction was intended to end the warrantless wiretapping by the NSA, which justified the action as essential in fighting the War on Terror. The district court held that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 is still law, and that the NSA should have sought warrants from the secret FISA court. The FISA court was intended to place a wall between intelligence information gathering and criminal investigations.

However, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated Judge Diggs’s ruling in July 2007, finding that the ACLU and the other plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the federal policies.

Supreme Court rejected arguments to establish standing in government wiretapping case
In Clapper v. Amnesty International (2013), petitioners argued about the possible “chilling effect” that wiretaps conducted under FISA might have on their First Amendment Rights.

They argued that there was “an objectively reasonable likelihood” that the government would acquire their communications, and that this risk had led them to pursue costly alternatives like foreign travel rather than phone calls.

The federal district court had dismissed the case for lack of standing, but the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had reversed this ruling. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the decision for five members of the Court, rejecting their arguments to establish standing.

Court has said there is expectation of privacy for cell phone location information
However, in a ruling that has been noted as pushing back on certain mass surveillance activities, the Supreme Court in Carpenter v. United States (2018) ruled that an individual maintains a legitimate expectation of privacy in the record of his physical movements as captured through cell-site location information.

 

[Peatness]

Zerohedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[-Luke-]

When I order a package on the internet, I sometimes have it sent to a "packet station" from DHL. Previously, you got a code by email that you had to enter on a screen, and then you could pick up the package. From 01 April on, you can only use these stations with a smartphone. Morons...

 

[FocusedOnHealth]

I remember watching an Amazing Polly thread where she was urging people to ditch their phones. The push back she got was a sight to behold, people are straight up addicted. It was like trying to take crack from a crackhead. Dopamine be damned.

It's not only the tracking part of it that is bad. Worse even, its the radio frequencies constantly irradiating you. Also, every time you look at the screen, your mind thinks its noon, so it makes the changes in your body to coincide with noon. So it totally messes up the circadian rythym and you get out of sync with the earth. If you got Cornet meter and saw the amount of radiation being emmitted, you might think twice.

That.
I have never had a smart phone. By choice. I have an old fashioned flip phone. I communicate just fine with others. I call and get calls. But I’m not glued to it all day long.
I never wanted to be addicted to my phone or be controlled by it as most people are. Not judging but most people are addicted to their smart dumb phones. They panic when they lose their phones. It’s pretty funny.
They can’t even exercize without it. Think about it. Before 2009 no one ever walked around with their cell phones glued to their ears. They might have talked on their old fashioned flip phone for a bit, but their phone was not glued to their ears 24/7 nor were they always looking at their phone for information obsessively.

People could actually talk to one another without a device getting in the way.

I do think that most people who have them are addicted to them.

Can’t they use other devices to surf the web? I do. It’s really not hard. People should test themselves to see if they are addicted or not by not using them for a few days.

 

[Grapelander]

People could actually talk to one another without a device getting in the way

I remember when I first saw parents ignoring their babies in the stroller while they stared at the screen.
The baby clearly wanted interaction and got none. Hard to believe this is being cultivated. Pure destruction.

 

[FocusedOnHealth]

I remember when I first saw parents ignoring their babies in the stroller while they stared at the screen.
The baby clearly wanted interaction and got none. Hard to believe this is being cultivated. Pure destruction.

Exactly. That’s my whole point in deliberately choosing to not have one. I truly think it takes away from normal human interaction. If a parent is always communicating with their smart dumb phone, the children are getting the leftovers. How is that being an interactive involved parent? I’ve been to sport games where all the parents care about is getting the game on video. But they are not really interested other than that. Or they’re playing with their phone.
And at local venues. People are sitting there playing with their phones when they could be playing with each other, interacting, communicating and such.
But this is all by design really. They next step is to have your phone “in you”…..some could argue that the jabs are a form of that. But how much of a stretch is it to go from your smart phone glued to your ear 24/7 to having your phone actually “in” your body via a chip or patch? Not much.
And many people will LOVE the convenience of that.

 

[Peatness]

'Dumbphone' REVIVAL IS SMART! / Hugo Talks​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1j6S7oEFok4

 

[FoodForeal]

They want the world to be like the movie "The giver". Nature will be reserved for the elite while the rest will reside in the "smart" cities.

View: https://youtu.be/xDVEH9mOKrk?t=147

In smart cities you would be constantly irradiated with 6G to allow connection of neuralink control at all times.

View: https://youtu.be/NNPz9eZ0JVc


View: https://youtu.be/hrkhUHjgo7Y

Smartphones are "Black Mirrors" or scrying mirrors.

Wifi frequencies can unravel rat kangaroo DNA: Biological Effects and Health Implications of Microwave Radiation
Average ambient radiofrequency (RF) power density levels have increased in urban areas by 1,000,000,000,000-fold.:

https://bemri.org/publications/natural-electromagnetic-fields/427-natural-and-human-activity-generated-electromagnetic-fields-on-earth/file.html

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpW9JcWxKq0


View: https://youtu.be/CVIy3rjuKGY?t=942

Monkey Mind Pong

“Extreme Suffering”: 15 of 23 Monkeys with Elon Musk’s Neuralink Brain Chips Reportedly Died

A public records request by an animal rights group revealed a shocking death rate among primate test subjects. “Extreme Suffering”: 15 of 23 Monkeys with Elon Musk’s Neuralink Brain Chips Reportedly Died Wren Graves

www.yahoo.com

HYPER-REALITY
Blade Runner 2049 Cells Interlinked Scene 1080p

CERN Part 2 - The Gotthard Tunnel Connection

The Gotthard Base Tunnel opened on June 1, 2016. An elaborate opening ceremony was performed for some very powerful people like Chancellor Angela Merkel of ...

youtu.be

@4:40

CERN Part 2 - The Gotthard Tunnel Connection

TheRabbitHole Published on Nov 22, 2016 The Gotthard Base Tunnel opened on June 1, 2016. An elaborate opening ceremony was performed for some very powerful people like Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, President Francois Hollande of France and…

www.bitchute.com

Black Mirror Episode 2 Final Speech

A word to all the casting TV shows out there. Taken from the British series 'Black Mirror' on Channel 4 in 2011. This episodes is called '15 Million…

vimeo.com

Blockchains | Unveiling The Future Of Blockchain Technology
There's Only One You | Blockchains' Digital Identity Solution
Blockchain, Technology That's All About Trust
https://apnews.com/article/legislature-legislation-local-governments-nevada-economy-2fa79128a7bf41073c1e9102e8a0e5f0#:~:text=Sisolak named-,Blockchains, LLC,-as a company


The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy - What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America's Next Rendezvous with Destiny

The next Fourth Turning is due to begin shortly after the new millennium, midway through the Oh-Oh decade. Around the year 2005, a sudden spark will catalyze a Crisis mood. Remnants of the old social order will disintegrate. Political and economic trust will implode. Real hardship will beset the land, with severe distress that could involve questions of class, race, nation, and empire. Yet this time of trouble will bring seeds of social rebirth. Americans will share a regret about recent mistakes—and a resolute new consensus about what to do. The very survival of the nation will feel at stake. Sometime before the year 2025, America will pass through a great gate in history, commensurate with the American Revolution, Civil War, and twin emergencies of the Great Depression and World War II
t. 1997

This is how we can fight it:

Jon jandai talk in spain

Jon jandai talk about life at The education for life foundation in Spain.

youtu.be

MAKE A CITY WAGE FROM A SMALL FARM S5 â E42

Free mini-course 4 Fundamentals of Making Small Farms Work: https://www.richardperkins.co/get-started/Read Regenerative Agriculture: https://www.regenerative...

www.youtube.com

 

[Doc Sandoz]

... They next step is to have your phone “in you”…..some could argue that the jabs are a form of that. But how much of a stretch is it to go from your smart phone glued to your ear 24/7 to having your phone actually “in” your body via a chip or patch? Not much.
And many people will LOVE the convenience of that.

This idea was explored 55 years ago in The President's Analyst - one of the great dark comedies of all time. The Bell Labs promo starts at 0:40.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PebCB0IIANI

 

[FocusedOnHealth]

This idea was explored 55 years ago in The President's Analyst - one of the great dark comedies of all time. The Bell Labs promo starts at 0:40.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PebCB0IIANI

Very interesting!