Tristan Loscha
Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2018
- Messages
- 2,206
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
McSweeneys is a pro-censorship, racist, sexist publication.
McSweeneys is a pro-censorship, racist, sexist publication.
Care to elaborate? I do not know them, but liked the compilation of quotes.
I’m f****** sick of California. I live here. Our state has been ruined by liberal nazisThat's how California is dominated by Democrats. Mail voting is their ace in the hole. Lawyering up their backup plan. Now, they have rioters as their insurance. Plenty of useful idiots for the elites to use to push their will.
unfair comparison and you know it.
This, however, is a very detailed and pretty fair comparison (although yes, the title and writing style is brash)-
Gun Control: The TL;DR For The Ignorant and Illiterate
'
"If Plano, TX,—gun capital-per citizen of the U.S. and the world—were a country, it would rank in the lowest 10 of all-cause homicide (#7 currently).
If these [Baltimore, Detroit, New Orleans, St. Louis] were countries, in contrast to Plano, TX, rather than being in the bottom 10 for all homicide, they would rank 4-7, in the highest of 218. Democrats. Leftists. Gun Control Aficionados."
And wrapping up all points-
"— America has about 357 Millon guns amongst a population of 312 Millon.
— In total, there are 32,000 deaths per year from firearms, 60% being suicide.
— Stripping out small numbers of both accidents (under 1,000) and justified shootings (just over 1,000), leaves 33% being homicide.
— But 80% of the homicides are from inner-city, gang related activities (to which drug laws likely contribute a great deal), and all of them are cities that have been in the hands of leftist, socialist, gun-grabbing Democrats for decades. Every single one.
— We’re left with about 1,700 homicides in a population of 312 million that are predators preying on innocents.
— That’s 0.00000544871795 or .00054%. And this is what everyone’s all up in arms about?
— Compare that to the estimated 210,000 – 400,000 that die each year from preventable medical errors, or the 3,500 that drown in swimming pools."
Wait a minute. Homicides from gang/drug related activity . . . the problem is (according to you) that only one side has guns? And if Republicans ran big cities, both sides would have guns. And if both sides had guns, they wouldn't point them at each other and pull the trigger?This, however, is a very detailed and pretty fair comparison (although yes, the title and writing style is brash)-
Gun Control: The TL;DR For The Ignorant and Illiterate
"If Plano, TX,—gun capital-per citizen of the U.S. and the world—were a country, it would rank in the lowest 10 of all-cause homicide (#7 currently).
If these [Baltimore, Detroit, New Orleans, St. Louis] were countries, in contrast to Plano, TX, rather than being in the bottom 10 for all homicide, they would rank 4-7, in the highest of 218. Democrats. Leftists. Gun Control Aficionados."
And wrapping up all points-
"— America has about 357 Millon guns amongst a population of 312 Millon.
— In total, there are 32,000 deaths per year from firearms, 60% being suicide.
— Stripping out small numbers of both accidents (under 1,000) and justified shootings (just over 1,000), leaves 33% being homicide.
— But 80% of the homicides are from inner-city, gang related activities (to which drug laws likely contribute a great deal), and all of them are cities that have been in the hands of leftist, socialist, gun-grabbing Democrats for decades. Every single one.
— We’re left with about 1,700 homicides in a population of 312 million that are predators preying on innocents.
— That’s 0.00000544871795 or .00054%. And this is what everyone’s all up in arms about?
— Compare that to the estimated 210,000 – 400,000 that die each year from preventable medical errors, or the 3,500 that drown in swimming pools."
Wait a minute. Homicides from gang/drug related activity . . . the problem is (according to you) that only one side has guns? And if Republicans ran big cities, both sides would have guns. And if both sides had guns, they wouldn't point them at each other and pull the trigger?
Bravo, thanks for posting this, Richard can be a wrecking ball.
How many time have you heard a collective "But we have to do something!" after a shooting, false flag etc, screamed from the mouth of some ignorant?
You can warn them taking the guns always ends badly and it usually the communists that do the killing - in the millions.
Oh the scoffs that a brainwashed mind can huff out at you for suggesting such a thing but here we are, Antifa burning, looting and murdering , running unchecked in the streets of America.
And they contend still no need for guns as they plot our deaths outload. Surreal.
Antifa, anti- fascists get it, communists, the same group on the far left of hitler in the 1932-33 elections in Germany where these guys were pulling the same color revolution as they are here with the same youhoo sponsors. Go find the picture of the banner they hoisted in the election hall next to the Nazi social democrats. Its the defiant fist plunging upright over the antifa flag.
But the same woke morons, the ones that eventually got slaughtered when no longer needed, demand our guns be taken oblivious to the history repeat playing out.
Well shame on us if we let them get away with it.
P.s. Ask Aussies and kiwis how their gun grab worked out for that. Jackboots on the streets and in livingrooms kicking in heads, pregnant or not.
We all know that Trump has condemned white supremacy before and we all know the question is ludicrous. That's not the point. Don't want to make it any easier for the left wing propaganda outlets to smear Trump.
Poor pandemic response - Trump response better than democrats >> ??? the democrats did not have an opportunity for a response and yet you say it was better. This imaginary response must have been preeeeetty bad lol. Bad faith to count this one for Trump.
all women should have the right and the equal possibility to decide over their own body.
at that moment Biden interrupted
I don't want to put words in your mouth, which is why I ended my sentences with question marks.Where did you see me claim anything about "sides," or that only "one side" has guns?
The stats are reproduced from the article I linked (hence the quotes). I don't know where you think I said there was a singular "problem," or that one was stated anywhere in the article.
That being said, the one thing that every criminal or bully is terrified of is an armed victim. I have yet to hear any gun control advocate rationally explain why someone who is willing to violate laws against murder, rape, grand theft and such will somehow cower in fear and bow down to some mandate about firearms. Makes no sense.
And hey, in Plano, Texas, virtually anyone could be packing multiple guns at any given time, and they don't appear to be shooting each other constantly. Quite the opposite, actually. I would say that real life example is an emphatic 'NO" to the final question you posed (just replace "both sides" with "everyone").
Regardless, the homicide from guns in the US appears to be between 10-11,000 per year, in a country with well over 300 million people (probably 350 Million at this point). That's right around 8,000 or so gang related gun homicides per year.
The overwhelming majority of gang-related violence is gang-on-gang. Hence my assumption that you were saying that the problem is that only one gang has guns?
Well, you said that republican cities like Plano have little gun violence because everybody has a gun and that the big democratic cities have lots of gun violence because the government takes guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens.I have no idea why you would possibly come to this assumption, based on anything I stated, or anything in the article.
Maybe you didn't mean those two things to have anything to do with each other, but I am trying to reason from one to the other and the only thing I can come up with is that gang violence would go down if there were more guns (like Plano). But, given that most gang violence is gang-on-gang, that would mean arming gangs better as a deterrent.