Vileplume
Member
Not sure why you feel it your business to judge other people's weight/fat, or what 20% has to do with it.
This appears to be the currently fashionable dominant discourse.
There is evidence that not everyone is at their healthiest when very lean, nor that trying to force leanness is always a health-promoting approach.
On some studies, it appears that the lowest mortality falls in the so-called 'overweight' range.
When large adipose coincides with health issues, it's often not clear to what extent it is a cause, a symptom, a protective adaptation, or a bystander.
Sometimes people get healthier when they get leaner, and sometimes they don't.
+1
Actually, I think people have a range of set points, and a range of other factors affecting fat mass that are often beyond our control. Not always a healthy 'choice'.
+1
[underline mine]
Being permanently immune to evidence is a mark of dogma.
Maybe you would, I don't know. But I'd guess you would almost certainly feel better if you had less inflamed joints and a recovered back. Being lean does not make people immune to back pain - ask me how I know. I know some health professionals try to fob off patients who want help with health conditions by blaming all their health conditions on their fat. I hope yours aren't doing that.
You can seek tactics to improve your back and your other joints regardless of your weight. It's possible that improved health will result in reduced fat, but that's up to your body.
I don't fare well with dairy ATM. If you don't either, you can leave it out for a bit and try it again another time. I also don't fare well with large amounts of refined sucrose displacing food.
Fruit and milk are among Peat's recommended sources of sugar.
One point to consider is that some research indicate that deliberate attempts at calorie restriction for the purpose of weight or fat loss usual fail. Something 95%+. Quite a few of those failures even when people stick rigorously to restrictive diets.
You have a point.
+1
He doesn't promote extreme leanness, though.
'Overweight' is a loaded term - begs the question. Anyone significantly above their optimal weight/fat may be to some extent less than fully healthy. But what is optimal can vary from person to person. I'm not buying the definition specified by the POO (Panel on Obesity - Olwyn spelled out the conflicts of interest of the members of this panel - eg weightloss industry stakeholders). I think BMI 27 is near the bottom of the BMI - mortality curve in some studies.
+1
+1
Peat and Haidut are not gods.
How about being respectful of them as human beings, and especially because they have generously shared information and thinking with people in a way that has been helpful to many. You don't have to agree with everything they say, just exercise basic politeness.
+1
+1
Great that you've resolved your issues. Not aware that Georgi has your issues, or was seeking advice on them.
I can't help get the feeling that anyone who is certain that it's all simple and obvious probably hasn't understood the complexity of the human body and our diversity.
Which forum advice? There's loads of advice on here from many perspectives, sometimes conflicting. I assume you couldn't have followed it all. If you think you've been following 'the Ray Peat diet', then possibly there's a conceptual issue.
So now you know it had that effect on you.
Of the countries with the highest per-capita milk consumption, not all show particularly large adiposity (eg the Scandinavian countries).
I love this post