I need get vac to proceed my career, what can i do to avoid "side effects"?

[Andrea Lucia]

i need to move to another country to get a decent job but i don't get any vac
as Peat said, given the number of harmful effects it has been causing, they should have already been removed from circulation or at least not required a health passport.
i'm very afraid about the effects, my family is putting a lot of pressure, can i try to get a good lote, or.. after vacced i can take ivemectin to block a spike protein?
I'm also afraid about invemectin, I heard that it can cause lung damage, I don't know if this is just a rumor
my family apparently didn't suffer from any side effects, but my dad had blood pressure problems after vac, he was PERFECTLY healthy before vac
my uncle had palpitations and chest pain, it also seems to be common for people in my region to have fever and symptoms of covid after vac
if I consult a specialist he will obviously pressure me to take the vac, they all support the farm industry

I'm perfectly fine now, my region is cold and I don't have any health problems, I'm 25 years old and I don't think I need an immunization
in the first wave of covid I only had a runny nose, even without a diagnosis
so how can I take the vac and reduce the probable damages?

You are in a hard situation. However, IMHO, I can FEEL and read the under lining fear surrounding you thoughts. You must get rid of that fear first so you can Live with more confidence and clarity. You are being honest when you say you do not want to take the shot. Why then do you question yourself? Why not STAND UP for what you want? Why allow any threats to dictate or influence what you innately know is not good for you? STAND STRONG! Your body is highly intelligent and if you decide to take a vax for the sake of a job, then you have sold your soul. A job is nothing more than earning your keep so you can provide shelter and food for yourself. In other words, you can create a service that you would enjoy and start doing it. Go wash cars, or harvest farm land, or pet sit, use your imagination and go out there and do it. Money is not hard to come by. You can provide a service. It will serve you and be much more beneficial to your health and longevity to Stretch yourself beyond your current environment and situation. No matter what, always rely on your own integrity. BTW, you may not die from the shot, but you may suffer for the rest of your life and the quality of your life will never be what it could be had you not taken the shot. Think long term, Quality, longevity and integrity. All the Best to you!

 

[Raw Egg Gnostic]

Please do not get it. One of my friends works for silicon valley tech company and they are crazy about masks and vax. But he always tells them he just won't do it and will sue them if they fire him. They have called him in to talk to HR ten times now but he just says he won't do it. This guy inspired me so thought I would share with you. I would go live in the woods before agreeing to receive the demonjection at this point. Best wishes.

 

[Thalgo]

Portugal, I was told that it is mandatory to have the vac certificate and negative test for covid


nurses here are very manipulated they usually get corrupted by any ***t but for jab.. nah
but it's the best alternative, maybe on darkweb I can find it because nurses in my region are idiots

I heard that bosses insist on the vac certificate,

sht, idk there were risks in being around vac people

but no work = no life

I'm in Portugal. You only need a negative test to enter

 

[Thalgo]

Also, that has always been the case here. Only negative test or certificate of recovery is needed

 

[Fred]

The vaccine is meant to either kill you or transform you. Yes, this sounds crazy, but the 1000s of lies surrounding covid and the vaccine point to no other possibilities. Threaten legal action - the approved vaccine is called "Comirnaty" and it's STILL not available almost a year later (as if that wasn't a big enough red flag). And the FDA says "the products are legally distinct" - referring to the difference between Comirnaty and the version currently being injected into people.

 

[tankasnowgod]

The vaccine is meant to either kill you or transform you. Yes, this sounds crazy, but the 1000s of lies surrounding covid and the vaccine point to no other possibilities.

Disagree. It could also be meant to control you. Or, it could just be a way to generate billions of dollars for a failed type of drug, that being mRNA tech. Drug companies love making money of products that don't work.

 

[Fred]

Disagree. It could also be meant to control you. Or, it could just be a way to generate billions of dollars for a failed type of drug, that being mRNA tech. Drug companies love making money of products that don't work.

Unlikely. If they just wanted to control people, why roll out a radically new vaccine platform? They could have used a "tried and true" vaccine with some innocuous modification that wouldn't arouse suspicion. Instead, they created a modified mRNA product which would be met with substantial resistance just due to the fact that it's new and untested. Extremely high odds that they are putting something in people which they KNOW will hurt or modify them in some way (i.e. "humans are now hackable animals" - Harari - Klaus Schwab's sidekick).

 

[tankasnowgod]

Unlikely. If they just wanted to control people, why roll out a radically new vaccine platform?

Why not? Besides, while it's "new" to the general public, the tech has been there for about 2 decades. Modera has been around since 2009. They have tried to get over 90 products to market, but only 1 could make it past phase 1 trials, and even that one couldn't get to phase 2.

While I think there are more sinister things at play, the idea that amoral drug companies are just trying to profit on failed technology does explain a lot, and is something that drug companies have done before.

They could have used a "tried and true" vaccine with some innocuous modification that wouldn't arouse suspicion. Instead, they created a modified mRNA product which would be met with substantial resistance just due to the fact that it's new and untested.

I mean, anything developed in a weekend and tested for only 2 months was going to be met with resistance. Besides, there are a several "vaccines" out there that don't use mRNA tech.

While I do think the mRNA tech was an additional angle to be suspicious of, I wouldn't have trusted ANY vaccine they attempted to roll out after the March 2020 lockdowns. J&J and Novavax have similar problems.

Extremely high odds that they are putting something in people which they KNOW will hurt or modify them in some way (i.e. "humans are now hackable animals" - Harari - Klaus Schwab's sidekick).

Well, it's not like this would be the first time. Why are you acting like drug companies only released beneficial products before 2019? This is the same industry that has released statins, SSRIs, Benzodiazapines, radioactive iodine, thalidomide, vioxx, xarelto, chemotherapy, and so on. And while the covid shots are the deadliest "vaccines" of all time, some of the drugs I mentioned are more deadly than the Covid shots.

Personally, I don't think they "know" that these mRNA drugs will "modify" people in some way, because there is no proof to back up their claimed mechanism of action. There was no RCT that involved at least 20,000 people split into two groups to detect this alleged "Spike Protein" in those that got the vax and not placebo. In other words, nothing to back up it's officially claimed "mechanism of action." I do think the idea of "modification" is a possibility, but I think it's just as likely they have no idea what they are injecting into people. And the more I see how clumsily this fake pandemic was run, the more I am convinced of the later.

 

[Raw Egg Gnostic]

They can print whatever money they want. It's never just about money.

 

[Abundant Life]

I had a friend who really, really, really wanted to travel months ago and was about to get the jab. I reminded her that she has resisted so long in getting the jab, she even lost her job and now this little travel itch is going to change all that? I reminded her that the mandates have been dropping slowly and asked her, how would she feel if she got the jab, traveled and then a month or two later they drop that requirement? She said, she would feel like an idiot and regret it. Guess what happened? They dropped the vaccine travel mandate and she was very thankful. With a little patience she was able to scratch that travel itch AND keep her health.

 

[tankasnowgod]

They can print whatever money they want. It's never just about money.

The Federal Reserve.... sure.

But Pfizer and Modera can't.

 

[cedric]

Nanolipid invaccine should be soluble in e.g DMSO. Then mRNA is easily distroyed.

 

[Giraffe]

Unlikely. If they just wanted to control people, why roll out a radically new vaccine platform? They could have used a "tried and true" vaccine with some innocuous modification that wouldn't arouse suspicion. Instead, they created a modified mRNA product which would be met with substantial resistance just due to the fact that it's new and untested. Extremely high odds that they are putting something in people which they KNOW will hurt or modify them in some way (i.e. "humans are now hackable animals" - Harari - Klaus Schwab's sidekick).

If you want to get a gene therapy on the market you have to prove that it's safe, which they were not able to prove in the past. IIRC it was around the time of swine flu hoax ... they changed the law in the European Union. Quite hidden and unnoticed by most an exemption was made for vaccines. Although vaccines are given to lots and lots of healthy people and pharmaceutical drugs are given to the sick people only, the safety standards for anything you call a vaccine are lower than those for pharmaceutical drugs. This was their chance to clear the first hurdle with their gene therapy trash.

This was discussed in one of the corona committee sessions quite a while ago. I hope I don't mix up things.

 

[Fred]

If you want to get a gene therapy on the market you have to prove that it's safe, which they were not able to prove in the past. IIRC it was around the time of swine flu hoax ... they changed the law in the European Union. Quite hidden and unnoticed by most an exemption was made for vaccines. Although vaccines are given to lots and lots of healthy people and pharmaceutical drugs are given to the sick people only, the safety standards for anything you call a vaccine are lower than those for pharmaceutical drugs. This was their chance to clear the first hurdle with their gene therapy trash.

This was discussed in one of the corona committee sessions quite a while ago. I hope I don't mix up things.

Reality is, we don't even know what's in the vaccine or what it's real purpose is. Ray pointed out some of the many problems (i.e. reverse transcriptase and various feedback loops), but there are many unknowns. Even a small amount of "contamination", say 1 part per million, is enough to create a million self-assembling structures, each with a million molecules (a single drop of water contains 1.4 sextillion molecules). This may sound like science fiction, but it's not. Fauci even mentioned self-assembling nanoparticle vaccinations in 2019.
The interesting thing about "Comirnaty" not being available (besides the obvious legal angle), is that we don't know exactly where the components of the vaccine are being manufactured. The approved version must be manufactured at specific sites. The unapproved version currently STILL being used (BNT162b2) could be getting some of the components from some secret site, and we'd have no idea, since it doesn't have to be divulged.

 

[DeadCatBounce]

The only way I know of that will work: Unbelievable - removal of the contents of the vaccine after vaccination

 

[David PS]

It may be wiser to just proceed with your heathy life without a jab than with a healthy career if it requires a jab. The government and the news media does not disclose the risks with getting the jab. Ireland seems to be disclosing some of the risk.

It appears that this coming winter is going to be harsh. The high cost of electricity and heat will require you to be healthy. The only guaranteed way to avoid the side effects of the jab is to avoid the jab. Stay healthy!

 

[Fred]

The Federal Reserve.... sure.

But Pfizer and Modera can't.

It is EXTREMELY likely that they are funded by the same people who created the fake pandemic. They have essentially unlimited funding, like CNN. CNN can lose 90% of its viewers without changing its business model, because they are not a business.

 

[tankasnowgod]

It is EXTREMELY likely that they are funded by the same people who created the fake pandemic. They have essentially unlimited funding, like CNN. CNN can lose 90% of its viewers without changing its business model, because they are not a business.

Pfizer and Moderna are not like CNN, so it's a bad example. Pfizer and Modera are both independent drug companies, while CNN is one network owned by Warner Bros. Discovery, which is a huge multinational company. Pfizer and Warner Bros. Discovery could be considered roughly equal, while CNN might be more like one drug that Pfizer puts out.

Even having said all that, while CNN is not independent, it is indeed still a business. They are somewhat insulated from any viewership swings, at least in the short term, because viewers aren't their customers. The actual "customers" of CNN are advertisers, cable companies (who often pay something like $0.01-$2.00 for every customer they have a month in order to carry CNN), and places like airports, who pay a fee to always have CNN on public TVs. They are likely packaged together with other popular channels (like TNT, TBS, Tru TV and such) owned by the same company to help isolate any particular network from viewership swings even more. Still, long term, viewship numbers do matter, and eventually, they will change the content one way or another, or cease to exist. The Learning Channel eventually became TLC, and aired programming radically different than their original namesake did.

 

[DeadCatBounce]

Pfizer and Moderna are not like CNN, so it's a bad example. Pfizer and Modera are both independent drug companies, while CNN is one network owned by Warner Bros. Discovery, which is a huge multinational company. Pfizer and Warner Bros. Discovery could be considered roughly equal, while CNN might be more like one drug that Pfizer puts out.

Even having said all that, while CNN is not independent, it is indeed still a business. They are somewhat insulated from any viewership swings, at least in the short term, because viewers aren't their customers. The actual "customers" of CNN are advertisers, cable companies (who often pay something like $0.01-$2.00 for every customer they have a month in order to carry CNN), and places like airports, who pay a fee to always have CNN on public TVs. They are likely packaged together with other popular channels (like TNT, TBS, Tru TV and such) owned by the same company to help isolate any particular network from viewership swings even more. Still, long term, viewship numbers do matter, and eventually, they will change the content one way or another, or cease to exist. The Learning Channel eventually became TLC, and aired programming radically different than their original namesake did.

90% of the big companies are owned by the same pool of people owning the shares of those companies - look at BlackRock , Vanguard etc. The money printers own it all.

 

[tankasnowgod]

90% of the big companies are owned by the same pool of people owning the shares of those companies - look at BlackRock , Vanguard etc. The money printers own it all.

Yeah, I get that, and technically, Cede & Co. owns everything.

Yet still, mergers happen, companies owned by Cede and the Blackrocks and such go "bankrupt," networks like CNN change formats, and CEOs like Albert Borla have their own goals within a larger framework.