Anyone know how to cleanse the spike out?

[Morten]

Hi @5LGreenback and @shanny.

Greg Reece seems to be friends with Dr Ana Mihalcea. His latest newsletter included some interesting quotes from 2010:

“Self-replication causes disease. Nano-robots are inherently much stronger than biological systems, being built of Diamondoid, so if they self replicate, that ‘disease,’ quote unquote, could be even a tougher problem than biological disease. So first of all, what's the feasibility of self-replication in the nanotechnology world?”
~ Ray Kurzweil

“As a general principle, you do not want to put self-replicating nanobots inside the human body. I suppose not everybody agrees with me on that. But that is the way I think that we can best guarantee safety. If the robots... nano-robots, are able to replicate inside the human body, that means they are using some component of the human body as food. And we don't want them to be doing that.”
~ Robert Freitas

Recently Bill Gates has admitted the presence of nanotech in the jabs:

“Making the mRNA is really easy and really cheap. And that's the magic of this thing. But there's no doubt in the next five years we can... you know, we just need to mess around. There's a lot of lipid nanoparticles, and some are very self-assembling.”
~ Bill Gates

He didn’t mention self-replication, but what he did say was a huge admission from someone high in the hierarchy that La Quinta Columna were right all along!

The bromelain in raw pineapple could be good for cutting up rogue proteins.

The malic acid and citric acid in dried apricots could be good to soak up and eliminate aluminium, gallium and other metals and semiconductors used in logical circuits.

The advantage is that those foods are readily available and in moderation, should be pretty safe!

Are you aware of other cleansing podcasts with dr. Ana? apart from the one you posted. thanks for the great info!

 

[5LGreenback]

This is the first video/ podcast I've seen that actually refutes the nano bots microscopy photos making the rounds (and explores some other interesting health items that can apparently be found in our blood). Much like the vaccines, I for one hope we are wrong about the nano tech and this video is correct. Note- they are not refuting that the vax's are toxic poison, just refuting that the microscope observations are nano tech....


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/StWHeIj0a04H/

 

[Richiebogie]

View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/StWHeIj0a04H/

Thanks @5LGreenback

Adam Bigelsen says that he and his father have been using Dark Field Microscopy for decades and they have seen square crystals and other phenomena recently attributed to nanotechnology for all of that time.

Dr Ana Maria Oliva says that even saline solution form crystals as it dries out! Certain sugar solutions too.

Start from 40:00 for discussion on objects under dark field microscopy.

At 1:17:00 Adam Bigelsen says that various structures are air pockets and dirt on the slides.

He says that a microscope reveals micro-particles. Nano-particles are 1000 times smaller.

It is possible that the strange formations seen via Dark Field Microscopy in the last few years are natural and part of a healthy blood sample. They may have been misinterpreted as self-spreading nanotechnology but have always existed in human blood but were rarely documented.

The advent of YouTube, Rumble etc has made videoing of blood under Dark Field Microscopy more common just at a time when novel worldwide vaccines were utilised, hence the conclusion that the vaccines have caused the strange blood components.

 

[Richiebogie]

Ethanol can help layers of nano sensors line up!

Macquarie University engineers have developed a new technique to make the manufacture of nanosensors far less carbon-intensive, much cheaper, more efficient, and more versatile, substantially improving a key process in this trillion-dollar global industry.

The team has found a way to treat each sensor using a single drop of ethanol instead of the conventional process that involves heating materials to high temperatures.

Their research, published yesterday in the Journal of Advanced Functional Materials, is titled, ‘Capillary-driven self-assembled microclusters for highly performing UV detectors’.

"Nanosensors are usually made up of billions of nanoparticles deposited onto a small sensor surface – but most of these sensors don’t work when first fabricated,” says corresponding author Associate Professor Noushin Nasiri, head of the Nanotech Laboratory at Macquarie University’s School of Engineering.

The nanoparticles assemble themselves into a network held together by weak natural bonds which can leave so many gaps between nanoparticles that they fail to transmit electrical signals, so the sensor won’t function.

Associate Professor Nasiri’s team uncovered the finding while working to improve ultraviolet light sensors, the key technology behind Sunwatch, which saw Nasiri become a 2023 Eureka Prize finalist.
Nanosensors have huge surface-to-volume ratio made up of layers of nanoparticles, making them highly sensitive to the substance they are designed to detect. But most nanosensors don’t work effectively until heated in a time-consuming and energy-intensive 12-hour process using high temperatures to fuse layers of nanoparticles, creating channels that allow electrons to pass through layers so the sensor will function.

“The furnace destroys most polymer-based sensors, and nanosensors containing tiny electrodes, like those in a nanoelectronic device, can melt. Many materials can’t currently be used to make sensors because they can't withstand heat,” Associate Professor Nasiri says.

However, the new technique discovered by the Macquarie team bypasses this heat-intensive process, allowing nanosensors to be made from a much broader range of materials.

“Adding one droplet of ethanol onto the sensing layer, without putting it into the oven, will help the atoms on the surface of the nanoparticles move around, and the gaps between nanoparticles disappear as the particles to join to each other,” Associate Professor Nasiri says.

“We showed that ethanol greatly improved the efficiency and responsiveness of our sensors, beyond what you would get after heating them for 12 hours.”

The new method was discovered after the study’s lead author, postgraduate student Jayden (Xiaohu) Chen, accidentally splashed some ethanol onto a sensor while washing a crucible, in an incident that would usually destroy these sensitive devices.
“I thought the sensor was destroyed, but later realised that the sample was outperforming every other sample we've ever made,” Chen says.

Associate Professor Nasiri says that the accident might have given them the idea, but the method's effectiveness depended on painstaking work to identify the exact volume of ethanol used.

“When Jayden found this result, we went back very carefully trying different quantities of ethanol. He was testing over and over again to find what worked,” she says.

“It was like Goldilocks – three microlitres was too little and did nothing effective, 10 microlitres was too much and wiped the sensing layer out, five microlitres was just right!”

Perhaps the odd pint of beer, glass of wine or gin and tonic can help flush out any nanotech in your blood!

Could that be the reason so few people have been affected by the jabs… booze?

Single drop of ethanol to revolutionise nanosensor manufacture

lighthouse.mq.edu.au

 

[Richiebogie]

In this interview, Dr Bryan Ardis discusses toxins, venoms and natural antidotes like cinnamon, liquorice root, nicotine…


View: https://www.bitchute.com/video/UrVQiJIYSA0j/

 

[Richiebogie]

Here is the original link to Mike Adams’ Health Ranger Report on Brighteon:

Dr. Bryan Ardis reveals shocking use of venom peptides in cosmetics and the food supply, with NEW SOLUTIONS for foreign protein detoxification

Brighteon.com is a leading online free platform that empowers free speech, allowing individuals to freely share videos and express their thoughts without any form of censorship. Join us today and be part of our community.

www.brighteon.com