What is consistent is you can't back up what you say but instead resort to saying things that are unfounded generalities.You just made a strange about face that doesn't fit your usual analysis. You have done this once before with me particularly, but I let that slide as you had lost your cool in an Agent Royale with Managing whom I assume got booted. I think you rushed to China's defense or was it Iran's, don't remember.
But this is weird.
Almost doesn't even make any sense. You spend a page and a half detailing my point which was China has been groomed for half a century which you did a fine job of, left out a few important things but ok, then you accuse me of falling for propaganda by way of my supposed impugning of the vast integrity of CCP morals.
Like I say, weird.
Edit: I now see you made another posting to me on the matter. Must have thought it over but I will read it tomorrow, good RPF!
Like I made an about face.???
Like somehow I had anything to do with managing being booted out. Innuendo? Benign or malicious? You tell me.
Your habit is to say something and then you don't back it up. Do you write books that only have a title and blank pages?
We don't make about faces in one post. That would be weird. What is weird to interpret being consistent as being fickle. But our minds aren't static. If over time, facts emerge that is counter to my initial determination. I would certainly have to reassess and in the end, even say I was wrong in my initial determination. That isn't being inconsistent. It is being open.