Woke dictionary/lexicon

[meatbag]

I don’t think these systems exist as defined, the words convey a supposed meaning, the actions of big business and banks don’t reflect what’s implied by said systems.

I think the overall system is about power, money is the power system, maintain this is the ultimate goal it seems, nowhere in any of these economic systems does it explicitly state that you should murder and destroy other nations via war to gain an economic advantage but yet we see it.

I think the craving for power is at its core bioenergetic in origin, folks hoard resources to ensure maximization of bioenergetic output, they are incoherent about what is bioenergetic coherency hence the reason why many billionaires succumb to cancer, Alzheimer’s etc , they don’t however suffer from these issues at the same rate as those from a lower socio economic status.

I think the systems have been defined, examined, reviewed, etc.
Which of the elites you point do aren't capitalists?

 

[akgrrrl]

It came up for me.

So I have 154 days to prepare where I exchange all my fiat currencies (not that there are many I have) for something more tangible as well as supplies to use to produce something I can live off. That is just 5 months. Still, I worry when I have something and my neighbors don't and I'm targeted. I'll have to team up with a warlord lol

I would like someone to start a thread on this, so we can collectively chew on it. I am abiut to purchase something so, uh, primitive but makes sense to me for where I live: a treadle driven stone tool sharpener (with 2 stones fine or rough). Hand axes,knives, mauls and scissors. Most make do with a rasp then whetstone, only one grinder with his shingle out for 150sqmiles 30K ppl. Lets generate ideas of things to invest in?

 

[yerrag]

I would like someone to start a thread on this, so we can collectively chew on it. I am abiut to purchase something so, uh, primitive but makes sense to me for where I live: a treadle driven stone tool sharpener (with 2 stones fine or rough). Hand axes,knives, mauls and scissors. Most make do with a rasp then whetstone, only one grinder with his shingle out for 150sqmiles 30K ppl. Lets generate ideas of things to invest in?

We will have to be very pessimistic as well as very imaginative and creative going about it. Sky's the limit.

Not only are we unprepared for a reset, the problem is that Klaus Schwab and his minions are. So they will have a stockpile of what we will really need. The problem is how many gold and silvers we have stored to use as tender. Will we be having a placard on our back with the word "Will work for food?"
To not do so, we have to be making our food.

Another thing is what the Texas power outage has made us realize. After decades of the global warming (now renamed climate change) hoax, we may have prepped ourselves into thinking a global cooling isn't in the cards. So there's going to be a lot more adjustment needed. But luckily for us, the US, other than California, can easily adapt. The Texas incident is a wake up call but it's not going to be difficult to go back to a more carbon future.

 

[MyUsernameHere]

Bezmenov was just some guy that came to the west that worked in media in SU. He probably worked for western int

If your takeaway from that video is 'Bezmenov was just some guy' then that's sad. Rather low-effort attempt to ignore what he speaks about by discrediting his character.

Maybe you should focus on the things he talks about instead. Do you think that kind of manipulation is not happening even today or that they are lies?

If you knew a thing or two about the Soviet dictatorship you would know that most of the things he speaks about are factual.

 

[Drareg]

I think the systems have been defined, examined, reviewed, etc.
Which of the elites you point do aren't capitalists?

All of them IMO, they are about money and power, the systems they call "economic" are adjusted or reframed with words to suit this goal, see stakeholder capitalism for example, this is being promoted via the fourth industrial revolution(reich).

Nearly every major event be it 9/11, Iraq or covid 19 some folks make billions in profit, they couldn’t care less about the countries they go into with regards to humanitarianism, they disrupt the country enough so they can exploit it economically.
If you view all major events through the lens of profit seeking you begin to see the patterns clearly.

 

[meatbag]

All of them IMO, they are about money and power, the systems they call "economic" are adjusted or reframed with words to suit this goal, see stakeholder capitalism for example, this is being promoted via the fourth industrial revolution(reich).

Nearly every major event be it 9/11, Iraq or covid 19 some folks make billions in profit, they couldn’t care less about the countries they go into with regards to humanitarianism, they disrupt the country enough so they can exploit it economically.
If you view all major events through the lens of profit seeking you begin to see the patterns clearly.

Yeah, I guess you were right originally though that it is kind of deeper than that. They currently utilize capitalism but the deeper issue is non-egalitarianism which is rooted in bioenergetics according to Peat and others

 

[akgrrrl]

All of them IMO, they are about money and power, the systems they call "economic" are adjusted or reframed with words to suit this goal, see stakeholder capitalism for example, this is being promoted via the fourth industrial revolution(reich).

Nearly every major event be it 9/11, Iraq or covid 19 some folks make billions in profit, they couldn’t care less about the countries they go into with regards to humanitarianism, they disrupt the country enough so they can exploit it economically.
If you view all major events through the lens of profit seeking you begin to see the patterns clearly.

I appreciated this comment. Rarely are we given the real reasons that America invades and wars in other countries. 1979 when the Russians moved into Afghanistan, we suddenly had to go there. Had I not known a man who dropped out of Univ of TX to go to Afghanistan for purely capitalistic reasons How would I have ever learned : (he knew the afghans would sell handknotted carpets, dowry textiles, treasures beyond belief to finance the repelling of invaders) He went back and forth for 8 years, made a fortune of it. But as he lay hidden by their merchants to select&organize shipment of all his purchases, he learned of the arrangements to mine and ship bauxite, and develop and control opium futures.

 

[meatbag]

All of them IMO, they are about money and power, the systems they call "economic" are adjusted or reframed with words to suit this goal, see stakeholder capitalism for example, this is being promoted via the fourth industrial revolution(reich).

Nearly every major event be it 9/11, Iraq or covid 19 some folks make billions in profit, they couldn’t care less about the countries they go into with regards to humanitarianism, they disrupt the country enough so they can exploit it economically.
If you view all major events through the lens of profit seeking you begin to see the patterns clearly.

Do you think socialism would be a more or less egalitarian system? Do you think if the profit motive was removed to incentivize war and chronic disease things would improve?

it had been posted on the forum before that curing diseases is a bad business model, do you think peace would be a bad business model as well?
Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: 'Is curing patients a sustainable business model?'

 

[Drareg]

Do you think socialism would be a more or less egalitarian system? Do you think if the profit motive was removed to incentivize war and chronic disease things would improve?

it had been posted on the forum before that curing diseases is a bad business model, do you think peace would be a bad business model as well?
Goldman Sachs asks in biotech research report: 'Is curing patients a sustainable business model?'

I think if folks can reach a resting state at a cellular level via bioenergetic principles they would calm down, healthy opposition could exist, right now it’s pathological destruction.
To me all political systems set up while we are stuck in an a state of cellular excitability will veer into psychopathology, at this point in history changing the environment coherently can’t be done while we are in this state, in the past a change in the environment via an economic/political system may have been fruitful, now I feel we need to correct cell physiology for people to perceive and behave coherently.
When they can’t reach a rested state at the cellular level I think the pathology develops, incoherent resource hoarding, it’s like the body overeating because it craves essential minerals your diet is lacking, the minerals added to diet will stop the desire to continue eating.

Not everyone is in an incoherent state, the majority are, what I suspect is a rise of separatist movements worldwide, the most coherent will want away from the incoherent, cells with the ability to enter into the rested state after stress will not desire to be in an environment surrounded by a mass of excitable cells who waste energy, coherent metabolism‘s don’t want to be around a mass of incoherent metabolism‘s, it’s cellular suicide.

The current profit/power system requires war to increase profits, blow up a building, get the insurance money, the company that rebuilds it makes money also.
Big pharma and the big medical establishment will go broke if we cure diseases, all we need at that point is the emergency room for accidents and rehab facilities.

 

[Drareg]

I’m adding some links here from genuine greens on the left of politics, they are highlighting how big banks and businesses have hijacked the genuine left and greens with wokism to push their own ruling class agenda, while I don’t agree with all the views in the links they are interesting and highlight the network we are dealing with, it’s basically the ruling class.

Im sure I will find more and expand this list.

Home - Wrong Kind of Green

www.wrongkindofgreen.org

From the NonProfit Industrial Complex with Love

www.theartofannihilation.com

Wrench in the Gears

A Critical Investigation into the Fourth Industrial Revolution

wrenchinthegears.com

 

[Drareg]

Another good article on wokism the real virus infecting the minds of many.
It highlights how wokese helps the elites more than the minority groups, it highlights the verbosity and vagueness, Peat mentions verbosity as one of the first signs of psychopathology, the woke are clearly mentally ill.

One very interesting quote-
"In fact, the term “racism” as the French “racisme” was originally coined to mean the hatred of Jews, and it retains this meaning in English. Ask any Klansman. And since Ross is not an ignorant or illiterate writer, and since he just published a book about Wagner, the only way to make sense of this passage without calling him dishonest is to understand that he is not writing in English, but wokese, with its irregular rules for Jews".

The Language of Privilege

The jargon and weird abstractions are central to the birth of a new elite, which uses the language of wokese as a barrier to entry

www.tabletmag.com

That’s all fine. But let’s put deliberation about the goodness or badness of using language to advance historically marginalized people aside for a moment, because it is downstream of the question of whether wokese actually really doeshelp those people it says it intends to help—or whether it mainly helps some other class of people.
Instead, let’s ask: Who does the woke playing field, as expressed through wokese, actually advantage? As a barrier to entry that is manufactured in universities, mediated by elite institutions and bureaucracies, and is intentionally complex and constantly changing, wokese is a tool that is most easily wielded by the credentialed elite—which suggests that the allegedly vulnerable cohorts in whose name this language is allegedly spoken are actually being used by others as rhetorical camouflage.

In reality, wokeness is a bourgeois sop to self-dealing millionaires. Why? Because those who already have the most resources and power are best positioned to game whatever new system comes about by throwing up obstacles that take training and money to navigate or overcome effectively. In fact, for them, the more obstacles in the course of advancement in any given field, the better. Working people with only a little bit of brainspace in their lives leftover from just making it all work can’t expend nearly as much energy figuring out how to navigate the mazes presented by fast-changing social norms and bureaucratic rituals. Having to learn and then constantly relearn a whole new language just to get along in college or navigate a workplace is an intolerable burden, which sifts them out.

So, in the end, the question raised by wokeness is a simple one: Doesn’t it actually just favor rich people?

Here’s how you do it: You talk about platforms, and spaces, and bodies with your nouns. With your verbs, well, you just use more nouns, plus suffixes that don’t fit. For some reason, this year, you put “settler” before you write “colonialism.” The letter X is very in, as you may have noticed when Elizabeth Warren’s campaign did an event with a group called Black Womxn For. Or maybe you have by now read about the now-infamous wokese imposition of “Latinx” (pronounced Latin-ex) to name a group of people first designated by a Nixon administration-era census as an ethnicity, and whose members either haven’t heard or don’t want to be termed by that label rather than the supposedly problematic “Latino” or “Hispanic.” A recent New York Times essay by progressive strategists Ian Haney López and Tory Gavito found that, “Progressives commonly categorize Latinos as people of color, no doubt partly because progressive Latinos see the group that way and encourage others to do so as well. Certainly, we both once took that perspective for granted. Yet in our survey, only one in four Hispanics saw the group as people of color.”
But pretend you don’t know that. Keep calling Hispanics people of color. Use the phrase “people of color” often enough that you are inclined to shorten it to “POC.” Then, add BI to it, so it is “BIPOC,” for “Black, Indigenous, and people of color.” Wait, but aren’t the Black and Indigenous people in the B and I already implied in the POC? Shh. Don’t worry about that, it’s just how we speak now. In elite American life, wokese syntax is picked up by osmosis, the way I knew that the subjunctive takes the plural in English before I knew the word “subjunctive.”

 

[akgrrrl]

Another good article on wokism the real virus infecting the minds of many.
It highlights how wokese helps the elites more than the minority groups, it highlights the verbosity and vagueness, Peat mentions verbosity as one of the first signs of psychopathology, the woke are clearly mentally ill.

One very interesting quote-
"In fact, the term “racism” as the French “racisme” was originally coined to mean the hatred of Jews, and it retains this meaning in English. Ask any Klansman. And since Ross is not an ignorant or illiterate writer, and since he just published a book about Wagner, the only way to make sense of this passage without calling him dishonest is to understand that he is not writing in English, but wokese, with its irregular rules for Jews".

The Language of Privilege

The jargon and weird abstractions are central to the birth of a new elite, which uses the language of wokese as a barrier to entry

www.tabletmag.com

That’s all fine. But let’s put deliberation about the goodness or badness of using language to advance historically marginalized people aside for a moment, because it is downstream of the question of whether wokese actually really doeshelp those people it says it intends to help—or whether it mainly helps some other class of people.
Instead, let’s ask: Who does the woke playing field, as expressed through wokese, actually advantage? As a barrier to entry that is manufactured in universities, mediated by elite institutions and bureaucracies, and is intentionally complex and constantly changing, wokese is a tool that is most easily wielded by the credentialed elite—which suggests that the allegedly vulnerable cohorts in whose name this language is allegedly spoken are actually being used by others as rhetorical camouflage.

In reality, wokeness is a bourgeois sop to self-dealing millionaires. Why? Because those who already have the most resources and power are best positioned to game whatever new system comes about by throwing up obstacles that take training and money to navigate or overcome effectively. In fact, for them, the more obstacles in the course of advancement in any given field, the better. Working people with only a little bit of brainspace in their lives leftover from just making it all work can’t expend nearly as much energy figuring out how to navigate the mazes presented by fast-changing social norms and bureaucratic rituals. Having to learn and then constantly relearn a whole new language just to get along in college or navigate a workplace is an intolerable burden, which sifts them out.

So, in the end, the question raised by wokeness is a simple one: Doesn’t it actually just favor rich people?

Here’s how you do it: You talk about platforms, and spaces, and bodies with your nouns. With your verbs, well, you just use more nouns, plus suffixes that don’t fit. For some reason, this year, you put “settler” before you write “colonialism.” The letter X is very in, as you may have noticed when Elizabeth Warren’s campaign did an event with a group called Black Womxn For. Or maybe you have by now read about the now-infamous wokese imposition of “Latinx” (pronounced Latin-ex) to name a group of people first designated by a Nixon administration-era census as an ethnicity, and whose members either haven’t heard or don’t want to be termed by that label rather than the supposedly problematic “Latino” or “Hispanic.” A recent New York Times essay by progressive strategists Ian Haney López and Tory Gavito found that, “Progressives commonly categorize Latinos as people of color, no doubt partly because progressive Latinos see the group that way and encourage others to do so as well. Certainly, we both once took that perspective for granted. Yet in our survey, only one in four Hispanics saw the group as people of color.”
But pretend you don’t know that. Keep calling Hispanics people of color. Use the phrase “people of color” often enough that you are inclined to shorten it to “POC.” Then, add BI to it, so it is “BIPOC,” for “Black, Indigenous, and people of color.” Wait, but aren’t the Black and Indigenous people in the B and I already implied in the POC? Shh. Don’t worry about that, it’s just how we speak now. In elite American life, wokese syntax is picked up by osmosis, the way I knew that the subjunctive takes the plural in English before I knew the word “subjunctive.”

Mental gymnastics4mainstreamUSA.
Thanks.

 

[Giraffe]

Writing music down like Mozart did is ‘white hegemony’, proposed reform of Oxford’s curriculum reportedly claims — RT UK News

 

[Regina]

Writing music down like Mozart did is ‘white hegemony’, proposed reform of Oxford’s curriculum reportedly claims — RT UK News

Notation is a tool. It becomes more complex (detailed) as needed. This is like saying maps are white hegemony.

More evidence of devolution.

The Chinese continue to want to study classical musical literature. So, it may fall down to them.
But what about the Royal College of Music? No Purcell? No Byrd? No Handel?

 

[Missenger]

One very interesting quote-
"In fact, the term “racism” as the French “racisme” was originally coined to mean the hatred of Jews, and it retains this meaning in English. Ask any Klansman. And since Ross is not an ignorant or illiterate writer, and since he just published a book about Wagner, the only way to make sense of this passage without calling him dishonest is to understand that he is not writing in English, but wokese, with its irregular rules for Jews".

Pilpul is a universal concept outside of the Talmud with merchants as noise to distract from organized robbery.

 

[Missenger]

.​

 

[Drareg]

Writing music down like Mozart did is ‘white hegemony’, proposed reform of Oxford’s curriculum reportedly claims — RT UK News

The students coming from these universities will be left behind in life, they have become a joke. The woke have moved out of the humanities which they have ruined, their viral wokeness is infecting all courses in university even STEM.

 

[Regina]

The students coming from these universities will be left behind in life, they have become a joke. The woke have moved out of the humanities which they have ruined, their viral wokeness is infecting all courses in university even STEM.

Maybe it's the plan. As it is, the science-ey departments are being used to develop everything from bio-surveillance, profusa, geo-engineering (chemtrailing every sky), crspr, genome crap, etc.... When parents finally capitulate and say no to sending their kids anymore, the empire will just officially re-purpose the venues for "global security" or whatever derelict thing blows their dress up.

 

[Regina]

Okay. Here's one of our deplorables. He's makin' some sense on WW4 and dangerous woke agendas

 

[Drareg]

Maybe it's the plan. As it is, the science-ey departments are being used to develop everything from bio-surveillance, profusa, geo-engineering (chemtrailing every sky), crspr, genome crap, etc.... When parents finally capitulate and say no to sending their kids anymore, the empire will just officially re-purpose the venues for "global security" or whatever derelict thing blows their dress up.

Make them stupid, they are a great circus though, perfect distraction while they bring in a new system.