Many of RP's dietary suggestions come from reading through animal studies but in these studies, the animals are either examined in isolation or as part of a group that is all receiving the same diet.
There are no studies where an animal is receiving a particular diet surrounded by animals that are eating vastly different diets, except one that I remember where the animals eating sugar were quickly killed by the animals eating PUFA and starch because the latter were so much more aggressive than the former.
This means that RP's suggestions don't take into account things like how your diet affects how you function in a world in which others aren't eating high quality food like you. For example, young women on this diet eating mostly fruits might become so attractive that it puts them in risky situations which ultimately lower quality of life in the long-run, by analogy of how passive rats eating sugar were prematurely killed by aggressive rats eating PUFA and starch.
Obviously it doesn't make sense to eat lower quality food out of fear of inviting aggression from others, but after reading various things, I have a theory that maximal longevity and happiness comes from eating foods which never go bad and from keeping your system as acidic as possible, while keeping calcium higher than phosphate and fat as low possible.
This means eating organic white sugar or honey, which never go bad, instead of fruits, which go bad quickly. Fruits will develop a luster that might invite jealousy and aggression, whereas organic white sugar and honey will keep you healthy without drawing excess attention to yourself.
It also means replacing at least part of your milk intake with powdered milk, and eating plenty of un-iodized salt, taking thyroid, and restricting water, to acidify your system.
you are getting something wrong
attractive people have higher quality of life (even if you get health out of the equation and reduce it to appearance)
you want all the benefits of peating but fear becoming too attractive as a prime woman? wear glasses, cut your hair short, dont wear short skirts, dont use makeup
sexism is a problem, yes. being unattractive is a bigger problem and does not mean you will not be victim of sexism.
It's entirely possible for attractive people to stay under the radar. It just does not make sense for them, because being attractive reaps you insane benefits.
even normies know this, subconsciously. I have said it elsewhere, the wish of being attractive probably has just as much importance to the reason people are here than the wish of being healthy.
there are a few studies on lookism as well. few, because from a sociological perspective looks are hard to account for without applying a brutal "blackpill" perspective, which is just impossible to do if you work a job in the humanities.
for example, there is a study that shows that traditionally handsome people get less punishment for the same crimes as less attractive people. in court.
same for job interviews and so on.
our whole society and our egos that we form to function in it are arranged in a way that are supposed to undermine the importance of looks. expose the importance of looks, and society stops functioning as well.
if you are attractive, do the same thing. do never tell people how easy it is for you to find the partner you want, get casual sex or to get what you want in general. never make anything about your looks and you will reap its rewards without paying in any way for it. this is what most attractive people do anyways, it's really common sense.
Last edited: