Killer CT SCANS

OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
 

Attachments

  • 3B685B57-2BBA-421E-9EA1-3CD3C1B06BDD.png
    3B685B57-2BBA-421E-9EA1-3CD3C1B06BDD.png
    135.6 KB · Views: 16
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“Aging, estrogen, cortisol, and a variety of stresses, including radiation and lipid peroxidation, chemically alter collagen, producing cross-links that increase its rigidity, and affect the way it binds minerals.”
-Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“If nuclear energy is as safe as the industry and governments say it is, the reactors should be located in the centers of large cities, because transmitting electric power long distances is presently wasting 50% of the power (Hirose Takashi, The Nuclear Disaster that could destroy Japan...and the world, 2011). Admiral Rickover, influential advocate of nuclear power, said "...every time you produce radiation, [a] horrible force [is unleashed,] and I think there the human race is going to wreck itself. [We must] outlaw nuclear reactors" (January, 1982 congressional testimony) Helen Caldicott says Fukushima is many times worse than Chernobyl. The radioactive cesium in German mushrooms and truffles hasn't decreased 25 years after Chernobyl, and the German government is spending increasing amounts to compensate hunters for the wild boars (who eat truffles) that must be disposed of as radioactive waste.” -Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“Behind the industries' assurances that "low level" radiation is safe, whether it's ionizing radiation, microwave or broadcast frequency electromagnetic radiation, is their reductionist approach to physics, chemistry, and biology. Those doctrines no longer have the prestige that they once did, but their pathological, authoritarian "science" culture is being sustained by the influence of corporations on mass culture.

With the institutions of research and education controlled by pharmaceutical, military and industrial interests for their own benefit, fundamental progress in knowledge is a threat to the system.” -Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“The consumption of manufactured foods, pollution of air and water, the use of lead in gasoline, cigarette smoking, increased medicalization and use of drugs, psychosocial and socioeconomic stress, and increased exposure to radiation--medical, military, and industrial--would be obvious things to consider, along with decreased intake of some protective nutrients, such as selenium, magnesium, and vitamins.

But those harmful factors all had their defenders: Who defends socioeconomic stress? All of the social institutions that fail to alleviate it. In 1847, Rudolph Virchow was sent to Poland to study the health situation there, and when he returned, the highly regarded anatomist, physiologist and pathologist announced that the Poles wouldn't have a health problem if the government would stop oppressing them, and institute economic reforms to alleviate their poverty. The reforms weren't made, and Virchow lost his job. Other harmful factors, such as seed oils, degraded foods, and radiation, have specific, very well organized and powerful lobbies to defend them.”
-Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
When a group of people in government and industry decide on a policy, they can use carrots (good jobs, grants, and prestige) and sticks (loss of jobs and grants, organized slander, and worse) to make their guidelines clear, and most people will choose to follow those cues, even if they know that the policy is wrong. Historically, policy makers have told the public that "radiation is good for you," "estrogen will make you fertile (or safely infertile) and feminine and strong and intelligent," "starchy foods will prevent diabetes and obesity," "using diuretics and avoiding salt will make pregnancy safer," and that the polyunsaturated fatty acids are "nutritionally essential, and will prevent heart disease."” -Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“Recent articles in the medical and lipids journals are praising the 1950 work of J. W. Gofman, and the 1914 rabbit studies of N. N. Anitschkow, as the research that revealed cholesterol to be the cause of heart disease. Anitschkow and his co-workers, however, understood that their experiment hadn't explained human heart disease, and John Gofman, about 50 years after publishing his work on the lipoproteins, has done some large studies that could be crucial in disproving the doctrine that has become almost a national religion.

He has shown that mortality from both heart disease and cancer corresponds very closely to the population's exposure to medical services, and specifically to medical radiation. During the peak years of heart disease mortality, medical x-rays gave very large doses of radiation with each exposure, and the population was also exposed to radioactive fallout from atomic bomb testing (explosions from 1945 to 1963 produced a peak of heavy fallout that persisted through the 'sixties and into the 'seventies).”
-Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“The steroids in general, especially those produced in large amounts, progesterone and DHEA, are important parts of the antioxidant defenses. Cholesterol, either that produced internally by the cell, or taken in from the blood stream, is the precursor for all the steroids in the body. Several of the major steroid hormones are antiinflammatory, and cholesterol itself is antiinflammatory. (Mikko, et al., 2002; Kreines, et al., 1990). Cholesterol also protects against radiation damage, and many forms of toxin.” -Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
 

Lollipop2

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
5,267
Yeah no wonder people’s health declines with so many dental x-rays and such.
Right?!?! And if they do tests: “nothing is found!!” BUT these sort of tests show exactly the problem. There are some videos showing they plant dying after a short time. I bet the starting point/health of the plant matters in these sort of experiments.

Thanks for sharing!
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
Right?!?! And if they do tests: “nothing is found!!” BUT these sort of tests show exactly the problem. There are some videos showing they plant dying after a short time. I bet the starting point/health of the plant matters in these sort of experiments.

Thanks for sharing!
People need to stop the “preventive” care radiation madness!

You’re welcome! 😘
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
“In the roundworm C. elegans, which is now a very popular animal for testing aging theories, because its genes and cells have been thoroughly "mapped," it was recently found that adding a gene that simply allows it to synthesize cholesterol, rather than depending on food for its sterols, increased its life span by as much as 131% (Lee, et al., 2005). That would be like increasing the human lifespan to about 175 years. These worms are also more resistant than normal to radiation and heat stress.

The cells of the thymus are extremely sensitive to radiation and other stressors, and their enrichment with cholesterol inhibits lipid peroxidation, DNA degradation, and death in response to radiation (Posokhov, et al., 1992)“ -Ray Peat
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
"In 1956, Hardin Jones wrote "If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery, other than when used in immediate life-threatening situations." In the 1990s, a group of cancer specialists were asked what they would do if they were diagnosed with prostate cancer, and most of them said they would do nothing." -Ray Peat The Cancer Matrix
 
OP
Rinse & rePeat
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
21,516
"If you want to use a polyunsaturated oil as a drug, it is worthwhile to remember that the "essential fatty acids" suppress metabolism and promote obesity; are immunosuppressive; cause inflammation and shock; are required for alcoholic liver cirrhosis; sensitize to radiation damage; accelerate formation of aging pigment, cataracts, retinal degeneration; promote free radical damage and excitoxicity; cause cancer and accelerate its growth; are toxic to the heart muscle and promote atherosclerosis; can cause brain edema, diabetes, excessive vascular permeability, precocious puberty, progesterone deficiency, skin wrinkling and other signs of aging.
 

joaquin

Member
Joined
May 4, 2022
Messages
699
Location
Shreveport
"In ancient Rome and Egypt, cancer was rare; cancer has been identified in only one Egyptian mummy. In the US and several other countries, between 2002 and 2005 there was an unprecedented decline (7% in the US) in the incidence of breast cancer, when the medical use of estrogen decreased following the Women's Health Initiative report showing that estrogen caused cancer, dementia, strokes and heart attacks. However, when the public was reassured about estrogen's safety, breast cancer incidence began increasing again each year. The cancer industry has been flexible and imaginative in ways of presenting "age standardized" death rates to show that they are making progress against cancer, but there are philosophical and scientific problems in "oncology" (i.e., the study or treatment of lumps) that should be considered by anyone who plans to do business with that profession." -Ray Peat
I recall reading about this. How this was not front page news is beyond me.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom