In Peat-land, low RHR means slower metabolic function (I believe this was inspired by Broda Barnes's work, but I haven't read it yet).
I'm a competitive weightlifter, and I've had a sub-50 RHR for the last 6 years, at least.
I mentioned this to my GP, who reassured me that it's a sign of having a strong, healthy heart.
So the question: Is low RHR indicative of a low metabolism, even in trained strength atheletes?
I'm a competitive weightlifter, and I've had a sub-50 RHR for the last 6 years, at least.
I mentioned this to my GP, who reassured me that it's a sign of having a strong, healthy heart.
So the question: Is low RHR indicative of a low metabolism, even in trained strength atheletes?