#93: Nick Stumpenhauzer (Died Suddenly)

schmolch

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
38
Location
germany


View: https://rumble.com/v20u0le-93-nick-stumphauzer-died-suddenly.html


00:00 - Nick's thoughts on Ray passing, Nick's health background, fulfilling work
14:38 - Nick's thoughts on heartache and separation
17:01 - When did Nick first hear about Ray?
21:00 - The making of Died Suddenly, hit pieces from the mainstream media, fake internet articles, and information
31:13 - When did the narrative of Died Suddenly start taking shape? Oligarchy chain of continuity regarding depopulation
37:07 - The vaccines targeting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system specifically to induce harm, how did they make so many vaccines so quickly?
41:32 - mRNA shedding is possibly a bigger problem than people think
45:19 - How common are those fibrous white clots?
50:09 - Were there toxic vaccine batches? How many will die?
57:53 - How will they get away with it? Catastrophic Contagion (a high-level pandemic exercise in 2022)
01:07:33 - How does Nick feel about the success of Died Suddenly?
01:19:38 - Is it healthy to read about evil people?
01:22:28 - Practical application of depopulation in preparation for 2030
01:26:28 - Question: proteolytic enzymes for vaccine protection?
01:29:01 - Question: how much pushback have you gotten since releasing the movie?
01:30:27 - Question: what should vaccinated people do to protect themselves?
01:41:49 - Question: were there any errors in the film?
01:49:52 - Question: did any unvaccinated people have white fibrous clots?
01:53:504 - Should there be a curation of Ray's work?
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
41:32 - mRNA shedding is possibly a bigger problem than people think
So, Danny asked if the mythical "Spike Protein" could be seen in detectable levels in the unvaxxed who hung around the vaxxed, and Nick agreed this might happen. This is also the core of all the "shedding" concerns for most people (although, there are other potential mechanisms). It's certainly the mechanism that the disciples of shedding espouse, the likes of Tenpenny and McCullough and Fleming and such.

There's only one problem with this theory..... even the vaxxed, shortly after taking the shot, have minimal detectable levels of this mythical "Spike protein" for about two weeks after taking the first shot (not the second). Of course, these are small studies, involving only about 10 healthcare workers, but they had about 20 blood draws over a two month period.

This mythical "Spike Protein" was only detectable in picogram per milliliter amounts for about two weeks, and then became totally undetectable. It doesn't even seem, like at peak "Spike Protein" production, that there would be enough of this mythical protein to spread to another (at least though casual contact), let alone after two weeks, when it isn't even detectable.

This is the core problem with the entire "shedding" theory, and especially, the "shed disciples..." Lot's of fear pron, no hard data to back it up. Why aren't the likes of Tenpenny and Fleming and McCullough doing studies to prove this concept, in regards to the "Spike Protein" shedding, is even possible? Wouldn't it be a simple matter of some blood draws before and after hanging around some of the freshly vaxxed? Or, a trial with some mice or rats?
 

Momma

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2022
Messages
694
Location
USA
01:19:38 - Is it healthy to read about evil people?


@Peatful
 

Jessie

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2020
Messages
1,018
15:39

I think it's kinda weird that people would assume Ray is wrong about something just because he died. Was he suppose to achieve immortality for you to find his work interesting? People like this was never really a follower of his work to begin with. It's extraordinarily impressive for anyone to make it 85 or older in today's world.
 

exile

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2022
Messages
149
Location
O
So, Danny asked if the mythical "Spike Protein" could be seen in detectable levels in the unvaxxed who hung around the vaxxed, and Nick agreed this might happen. This is also the core of all the "shedding" concerns for most people (although, there are other potential mechanisms). It's certainly the mechanism that the disciples of shedding espouse, the likes of Tenpenny and McCullough and Fleming and such.

There's only one problem with this theory..... even the vaxxed, shortly after taking the shot, have minimal detectable levels of this mythical "Spike protein" for about two weeks after taking the first shot (not the second). Of course, these are small studies, involving only about 10 healthcare workers, but they had about 20 blood draws over a two month period.

This mythical "Spike Protein" was only detectable in picogram per milliliter amounts for about two weeks, and then became totally undetectable. It doesn't even seem, like at peak "Spike Protein" production, that there would be enough of this mythical protein to spread to another (at least though casual contact), let alone after two weeks, when it isn't even detectable.

This is the core problem with the entire "shedding" theory, and especially, the "shed disciples..." Lot's of fear pron, no hard data to back it up. Why aren't the likes of Tenpenny and Fleming and McCullough doing studies to prove this concept, in regards to the "Spike Protein" shedding, is even possible? Wouldn't it be a simple matter of some blood draws before and after hanging around some of the freshly vaxxed? Or, a trial with some mice or rats?

I’m really hoping it’s not a big deal. I have to be around a decent amount of coworkers who have gotten it. Seems impossible to completely avoid.
 

Peatress

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
3,556
Location
There
This is the interview with Ray that Danny mentioned

Calcium, Phosphate, Authoritarianism, Eugenics & CIA Spymaster Allen Dulles with Ray Peat [GE #34]​


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qA9YrebN5zY

Time Stamp
Danny Roddy

4 years ago (edited)

00:55 — "The newsletter is available by email now, and it's $28 US which can be paid through PayPal, at raypeatsnewsletter@gmail.com." Ray Peat
01:27 — "It is extremely important to realize that calcium deposits in soft tissues become worse when the diet is low in calcium." Lets Eat Right to Keep Fit by Adelle Davis (1970) http://raypeat.com/articles/articles/calcium.shtml
03:06 — Can we see living structure in a cell? By Gilbert Ling https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854101
03:22 — The calcium paradox of essential hypertension by David McCarron https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3544831
04:18 — Danny's summary of the cell (see Cells, Gels, and The Engines of Life for images)
05:43 — Is it a natural phenomenon for a cell to disorder its water?
05:54 — What retains water in living cells? By Gilbert Ling https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1082166
06:51 — "On page 95 of my first book, 'A Physical Theory of the Living State; the Association Induction Hypothesis' you will discover what I call the Principle of Additivity. This Principle suggests that any agent that binds onto the cell proteins will affect the entire protein involved. It is the reach and strength of binding that distinguish a cardinal adsorbent. As an example, each ATP causes the binding of some 8000 water molecules on an appropriate protein molecule. So whether carbon dioxide can be called a cardinal adsorbent is a question that must await more experimental study." Ling (2014)
07:08 — Ray on Gilbert Ling's "lactate paradox" of high altitude experiment (CO2 prevents full depolarization)
07:56 — "In the normal resting state, a cell is 'polarized.' In the depolarized state, a cell is vulnerable, and if it is too frequently depolarized, it can be damaged or killed in the process called 'excitotoxicity,' and other related degenerative processes. Cancer cells are chronically 'depolarized,' and this is related to their low-efficiency metabolism." Lungs, shock, inflammation, and aging by Ray Peat (2002)
08:33 — Why does carbohydrate produce more carbon dioxide than fat?
09:38 — "Mg or K is needed to form the phosphorylated ATPase that then upon exposure to Ca or Na transfers a phosphate to ADP, generating ATP. Mg helps to retain and generate ATP." Andrew Kim
09:39 — "It [magnesium] is the basic protective calcium blocker." Calcium and Disease by Ray Peat (2009)
10:40 — The breakdown of ATP to ADP increases intracellular phosphate. Does something similar happen when a person eats too much phosphate?
10:55 — "In addition, dietary fructose reduces plasma phosphate levels by 30 to 50%…" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11036473
11:26 — Ray on "the high-energy phosphate bond"
12:49 — How is phosphate deenergizing the cell?
14:16 — Is phosphate a cell depolarizer?
14:23 — Ray describes the death of a cell
15:48 — "In the body, as in a chain, the weakest link breaks down under stress although all parts are equally exposed to it.” Stress Without Distress by Hans Selye (1974)
16:38 — "Our brain grows into our culture, and the culture lives in our nervous system." Ray Peat (2009)
16:44 — "It is too often not realized that culture itself is an adaptive tool, one of whose main functions is to make the physiological emergencies come less and less often.” Abraham Maslow (1943)
17:28 — Ray describes finding Maslow's work after reading the Freudians for six months
17:56 — Carl Rogers' work was manipulated by authoritarian-types
18:35 — Ray on the differences between Rogers and Maslow
19:19 — Libertarianism and the Koch brothers
20:00 — Journey into a Libertarian Future 1-6 https://bit.ly/2xNTRPn, https://bit.ly/2QdURTA, https://bit.ly/2xZaGpD, https://bit.ly/2OYDoyg, https://bit.ly/2RaoeY4, https://bit.ly/2xPgKBN
20:22 — "...A person's present-orientedness or, in economic terms, its high degree of time preference (which is highly correlated with low intelligence, and both of which appear to have a common genetic basis)." "In every society of any degree of complexity, specific individuals quickly acquire elite status as a result of having diverse talents. Owing to achievements of superior wealth, wisdom, bravery, or a combination thereof, particular individuals command respect, and their opinions and judgments possess natural authority." Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2007)
20:42 — Ray on Murray Buchan as a good libertarian compared to the Koch-type
20:51 — "Libertarianism in the US has been primarily a decorative veneer for advocacy of transferring government power entirely to the big corporations, but a few people like Justin Raimondo [antiwar.com] seem to be creating a more authentic libertarianism—he’s associated with the Randolph Bourne Institute, and policies very different from the Cato Institute/Koch brothers’." Ray Peat (2017)
21:15 — Danny doubts the usefulness of "the non-aggression principle" in light of Hans Selye's work on stress and survival
21:43 — "Estrogen, hyperventilation, lactate, etc., increase serotonin, and I think it’s serotonin that directly increases PTH, and then PTH increases NO." Ray Peat (2017)
22:23 — "...Serotonin stimulates the secretion of prolactin.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23506438 "...prolactin could be a mirror of serotonin in the brain." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542707 "...serotonin could be one of the factors regulating PTH secretion and/or contributing to PTH hypersecretion..." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6255002
22:28 —"…An excess of plasma prolactin is associated with an excess of plasma PTH and vice versa." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7130342
22:50 —"His profoundly lowered basal metabolic rate and decreased CO2 production, resulting probably from severe hypothyroidism…” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10084002
23:09 —"…In the rat, TSH induces a release of 5-HT and histamine..." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4109651 "...Thyroid hormone and the catecholamines are antagonistic, having directly opposing actions on the blood pressure and the blood fats.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4766338
23:22 —"Hyperventilation is defined as breathing in excess of the metabolic needs of the body, eliminating more carbon dioxide than is produced, and, consequently, resulting in respiratory alkalosis and an elevated blood pH." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10546483
24:08 — A good environment and 'not needing' your hormones. Generative Energy #26 - https://youtu.be/3AI46HYJ3ro?t=36m26s
24:56 — Is there much information on the carboniferous period?
25:39 — In the 1940s, people believed that a new ice age was approaching
25:58 — "Climate experts believe the next ice age is on its way." Leonard Nimoy, In Search Of: "The Coming Ice Age" (1978) https://youtu.be/1kGB5MMIAVA
26:39 — "In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.” The First Global Revolution: A Report by The Council of The Club of Rome by Alexander King & Bertrand Schneider (1993)
26:51 — "Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society." Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment by Paul Ehrlich, John Holdren, and Ann Ehrlich (1977)
26:52 — “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Program (UNEP)
27:06 — Ray on job automation fast-tracking the Oligarchy's need to get rid of 4-5 billion people
27:27 — War! What is it good for? Mustard gas medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246228
27:36 — Ray's favorite example research financing: Elwood Jensen's transition from chemical warfare research to estrogen research
28:55 — Was estrogen research being guided by the hands of the eugenics fanatics?
29:16 — How & Why Big Oil Conquered The World by James Corbett Part I: https://youtu.be/ySnk-f2ThpE Part II: https://youtu.be/0wlNey9t7hQ
29:43 — Ray on the transition of eugenics into genetics
30:29 — Who funded Hitler?
31:15 — Ray on the coup against Roosevelt with Smedley Butler
33:15 — Interview with Joan Talley (Sister of Allen Dulles) "My father was a Nazi spy." Allen Macy Dulles, Jr.
33:38 — Who poisoned Roosevelt?
34:05 — Allen Dulles’ involvement in two high-profile American presidential assassinations (Roosevelt and JFK)
35:17 — Is there a “new” Allen Dulles at the CIA?
36:02 — Are vitamin D and calcium necessary for thyroid and the other steroids to work?
37:43 — Clarifications on the progesterone Progest-E product by Kenogen
38:49 — What could cause a strange reaction to progesterone? "Have you had a blood test for vitamin D and TSH [thyroid function]? High estrogen increases the conversion of progesterone to the 5- metabolite, but thyroid and progesterone lower estrogen, preventing the exaggeration of that pathway. A vitamin D deficiency disturbs many hormones, and can cause breast pain.” Ray Peat on breast pain while using progesterone (2018)
39:19 — "The effects of estrogen and progesterone are systemically opposed to each other—estrogen excites, progesterone calms, estrogen cools, progesterone heats, estrogen increases nitric oxide, progesterone lowers it, etc." Ray Peat (2017)
41:20 — Ray recalls a woman with severe hyperestrogenemia who didn’t respond to 400 milligrams of progesterone who likely needed to work on the liver to restore balance
42:14 — Experiencing bloating with milk or sweet orange juice (not tart or sour)
43:37 — What is Ray working on right now?
 
Last edited:

wolfman37

Member
Joined
May 2, 2021
Messages
21
So, Danny asked if the mythical "Spike Protein" could be seen in detectable levels in the unvaxxed who hung around the vaxxed, and Nick agreed this might happen. This is also the core of all the "shedding" concerns for most people (although, there are other potential mechanisms). It's certainly the mechanism that the disciples of shedding espouse, the likes of Tenpenny and McCullough and Fleming and such.

There's only one problem with this theory..... even the vaxxed, shortly after taking the shot, have minimal detectable levels of this mythical "Spike protein" for about two weeks after taking the first shot (not the second). Of course, these are small studies, involving only about 10 healthcare workers, but they had about 20 blood draws over a two month period.

This mythical "Spike Protein" was only detectable in picogram per milliliter amounts for about two weeks, and then became totally undetectable. It doesn't even seem, like at peak "Spike Protein" production, that there would be enough of this mythical protein to spread to another (at least though casual contact), let alone after two weeks, when it isn't even detectable.

This is the core problem with the entire "shedding" theory, and especially, the "shed disciples..." Lot's of fear pron, no hard data to back it up. Why aren't the likes of Tenpenny and Fleming and McCullough doing studies to prove this concept, in regards to the "Spike Protein" shedding, is even possible? Wouldn't it be a simple matter of some blood draws before and after hanging around some of the freshly vaxxed? Or, a trial with some mice or rats?
What if these healthcare workers only received a placebo injection? Has there been confirmation of the possibility of placebo injections?
 

StephanF

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
707
Location
Reno
This is the core problem with the entire "shedding" theory, and especially, the "shed disciples..." Lot's of fear pron, no hard data to back it up.
Dr. Stephanie Seneff gave a presentation on how the mRNA gene therapy triggered the production of exosomes. Maybe these are ‘shed’ and cause the reported symptoms?
 

Advocate2021

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
978
Dr. Stephanie Seneff gave a presentation on how the mRNA gene therapy triggered the production of exosomes. Maybe these are ‘shed’ and cause the reported symptoms?
Dr Peat talked about exasomes and the mechanism of shedding quite a bit. We are still learning but hundreds of thousands of women across the world, my self included, experienced major menstrual complications when these things first rolled out back in spring 2021, directly correlated to exposure to freshly injected people through breath and/or touch. Too prolific to be coincidence. there is some sort of shedding- we just dont know for sure how long it lasts and/or poses any risk. im really pretty certain all of us have been contaminated by the release of these things at this point- its in the water, air etc. these things were self disseminating. So, i just keep my self as healthy and superhuman as possible these days to be able to transcend it hopefully - diet of steel, progest e, aspirin, methylene blue, D, A, K, other boosting substances at times, etc. All we can do at this point. And i seem to have recovered from the original jolt to my system in spring of 2021 whereby a i bled every two weeks for five months and could not stand up during a couple of my periods- never had anything like that happen to me in my life and there just is no other explanation for it.so I feel the shedding is definitely real. i just dont know for how long.
 

LadyRae

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2021
Messages
1,525
Dr Peat talked about exasomes and the mechanism of shedding quite a bit. We are still learning but hundreds of thousands of women across the world, my self included, experienced major menstrual complications when these things first rolled out back in spring 2021, directly correlated to exposure to freshly injected people through breath and/or touch. Too prolific to be coincidence. there is some sort of shedding- we just dont know for sure how long it lasts and/or poses any risk. im really pretty certain all of us have been contaminated by the release of these things at this point- its in the water, air etc. these things were self disseminating. So, i just keep my self as healthy and superhuman as possible these days to be able to transcend it hopefully - diet of steel, progest e, aspirin, methylene blue, D, A, K, other boosting substances at times, etc. All we can do at this point. And i seem to have recovered from the original jolt to my system in spring of 2021 whereby a i bled every two weeks for five months and could not stand up during a couple of my periods- never had anything like that happen to me in my life and there just is no other explanation for it.so I feel the shedding is definitely real. i just dont know for how long.
Absolutely. I am one of those women, unvaxed, that experienced bizarre menstrual symptoms just 2 days after my husband got vaxed.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
I’m really hoping it’s not a big deal. I have to be around a decent amount of coworkers who have gotten it. Seems impossible to completely avoid.
Well, the two most important questions, in that regard....

1. Did they show any noticeable symptoms or serious diseases?
2. Did you come down with any types of symptoms after being around them? And if you did, were they any different than other types of colds or such that are regarded as transmissible from the pre 2021 (or 2019) timeframe?
 
Last edited:

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
What if these healthcare workers only received a placebo injection? Has there been confirmation of the possibility of placebo injections?
What if everyone who took one of the so called "vaccines" got a placebo injection? Who or what could confirm the possibility that you speak of, anyway?

In the studies I have seen, they tested specific vaccines (eg, either Pfizer or Moderna's Covid 19 shot, but not both in the same study). They tend to be very detailed in that sort of thing.
 
Last edited:

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Absolutely. I am one of those women, unvaxed, that experienced bizarre menstrual symptoms just 2 days after my husband got vaxed.
All drugs are detectable in bodily fluids and such for about 2-3 days after ingestion, from aspirin to Zoloft, and everything in between. This is even true of radiation treatments for cancer. It's been confirmed that the products of the demonvax appears in bodily fluids for about 48 hours or so after a given dose.

It's a legit concern, but does nothing to support the longer term fear pron about constant shedding of the mythical "Spike Protein" from those that opted to take the demonvax.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Dr. Stephanie Seneff gave a presentation on how the mRNA gene therapy triggered the production of exosomes. Maybe these are ‘shed’ and cause the reported symptoms?
It's funny to bring up the name "Stephanie Seneff" when someone is asking for "hard data." She's the one who speculated (but never proved) that glyphosate was being incorporated into gelatin in place of regular glycine. While it should have been a relatively straightforward process to buy some commercial gelatin, and test it for glyphosate levels. "Hard Data" is something she does not specialize in.

Maybe, someday, Dr. Seneff will quit giving speculative presentations and actually conduct some experiments to prove or disprove her theories?
 

LadyRae

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2021
Messages
1,525
All drugs are detectable in bodily fluids and such for about 2-3 days after ingestion, from aspirin to Zoloft, and everything in between. This is even true of radiation treatments for cancer. It's been confirmed that the products of the demonvax appears in bodily fluids for about 48 hours or so after a given dose.

It's a legit concern, but does nothing to support the longer term fear pron about constant shedding of the mythical "Spike Protein" from those that opted to take the demonvax.
I don't remember if we were intimate during those 2 days..but I hope not!😎
 

StephanF

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Messages
707
Location
Reno
It's funny to bring up the name "Stephanie Seneff" when someone is asking for "hard data." She's the one who speculated (but never proved) that glyphosate was being incorporated into gelatin in place of regular glycine. While it should have been a relatively straightforward process to buy some commercial gelatin, and test it for glyphosate levels. "Hard Data" is something she does not specialize in.

Maybe, someday, Dr. Seneff will quit giving speculative presentations and actually conduct some experiments to prove or disprove her theories?
I did not write that Dr. Seneff said that the exosomes were responsible for the shedding symptoms. This is way off my field of expertise, but I understood that exosomes were little ‘messengers’ to communicate throughout the body. If we trust the many reports of this ‘shedding’ symptom, then if it is not the spike protein -since you stated that the concentrations are too low- then what causes it in your opinion?
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
If we trust the many reports of this ‘shedding’ symptom, then if it is not the spike protein -since you stated that the concentrations are too low- then what causes it in your opinion?
Well, for starters, I don't think all such reports should be blindly trusted.

Second, as for what "caused" any particular report, that I do not know. There is no way I could know in each individual case, not without a proper in person examination. I would suggest that anyone that is grouping these reports together hasn't done the requisite examinations, either.

I would suggest those arbitrary groupings of reports could have multiple causes, and for any correct determination to be made in any particular case, a detailed, in person examination would have to take place. But, of course, people speculating as to cause don't want to do this, as a proper examination itself would likely take an hour (or more), so examining thousands of patients would take months/years for any doctor, assuming those patients could even all go to see the same doctor.

Of course, it's always harder to do things the proper way. It's a lot easier to just make unprovable assumptions in cases that haven't been analyzed by a competent professional, and then speculate as to a cause, and then capitalizing on your newfound bitchute/rumble fame by putting out a book or charging for a lecture, or a subscription newsletter, or what have you.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom