Emotional feels, yet I made no assertive claim and only said that I suspect you being politically driven. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Semitism -> feminism,
Feminism spreads around
Now Semitism -> antifeminism
So Semitism is just contrarian?
Governor De Santis is Jewish yet is seen as a light in our current world by some.
Yet other Jewish people are not like DeSantis.
Your putting cultural motives as the leading cause behind someone's actions, as if to say that once you've embraced a certain culture it is impossible to have freedom of movement inside of it.
And your claims are not coherent about semitism causing feminism and now doing the opposite for the sole reason that it became widespread, what did they expect when they gave women voting rights, that it would remain in their town only?
Stop this pseudointellectual drivel really, its like im talking to someone that really thinks highly of himself by reading 1 book on philisophy or some ***t. If you were truly open to discussion you would address my point and not call them emotional:
"You are talking about Jewish women feeling inadequate and that this results in reactionary movements against feminism?"
So explain how this makes sense to you. Because every feminist I know claims the patriarchy was oppressing for any women, not only Jewish ones, so every women should feel inadequate by this logic.
I agree on 1 point though, feminism was caused by Jews, whether you fancycoat it or not.
I mean instead of explaining myself in a clear non biased way I’ll just get down to the nitty gritty style that suits some people better.
It seems to me you just glossed over what I said without really thinking about it that deeply. Got that knee jerk reaction.
Semitic culture at odds with the European one caused feminism. As this became the de facto European mindset and new Jews were born into it, they again went against it just like their ancestors did.
The surface layer culture (ie feminism) changed, but the deeper Jewish need to go against European culture didn’t.
I’m not talking about a coherent organized Semitic cabal (though those do exist). I’m not talking about exceptions to the rule like De Santiago (exceptions always exist and are irrelevant). I’m talking about a grand cultural type that is widespread and exhibits itself over centuries.
Intellectualism is garbage circle jerking, I’m just trying to be clear. This convo is devolving into the same style of circle jerking, with the same compulsive cherry picking and hyper focus on point that are irrelevant to the main idea.
“so every women should feel inadequate by this logic.”
Yes, and many do. Not all but many. We’re talking grand macro here.
And because Jewish people also feel this, they have allied themselves with women. And naturally the ones who would feel this the most are Jewish women, which is why so many of them have been involved with so much, and why they eventually go into such a tailspin of cultural perversion that they eventually end up fighting against their own recent forebears work (ie the Jewish women this thread was started about).
I mean culture doesn’t completely control you but you can’t truly escape it. And statistically it had huge effects.
It’s interesting and powerful to think of almost everything as a field, like a magnetic field. Every person has their own “field”, and is inside of many other fields, like a 3d vein diagram. Fields can have an additive or unattractive effect on each other. The sum total of every field is each person and it’s also a living organism, with waves going through the total field as things happen.
Fields don’t control every persons every action, which is why you can find exceptions to every pattern. But they do have an action that most people can’t escape. Maybe in the future that’ll change, or maybe it’s actually something desirable.