Vitamin B3 counteracts (cancer) cachexia, by restoring NAD+ levels

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
As many of my readers know, the majority of cancer patients do not succumb from the actual tumor burden, but as a result of (usually in that order) cachexia, immunocompromise from radiation/chemotherapy, hospital-acquired infection, and/or cytokine storm after surgery for removing the tumor. Of these, cachexia is perhaps the most pernicious as its cause is considered unknown, it affects all organs/tissues, and no remedies exist to even mitigate it. Cachexia is also the main cause of death in other "wasting" conditions, including sarcopenia of advanced age, diabetes type I, untreated chronic inflammatory diseases such as Crohn's disease, multiple sclerosis, prolonged bedridden states, etc. If decline in NAD+ levels is the main reason behind cachexia in general, then the findings of this study may provide a cheap, safe and widely available remedy that can affect a significant percentage of chronically ill people worldwide. This is why I put the "cancer" word in the title in brackets, as the findings of this study likely apply to cachexia of any origin, not just cancer.

The study below demonstrates that niacin at a provably non-toxic human-equivalent dose (HED) of about 10mg/kg daily almost completely prevented the cachexia in animals with advanced human colon cancer (xenograft model). The mechanism of action was, as usual, restoring NAD+ levels (and thus the NAD/NADH ratio), which are known to be drastically lower in cancer patients...as well as people with virtually any disease (including acute/infections ones). Importantly, this high(ish) dose of niacin inhibited the major NAD-consuming enzymes such as PARP-1 and CD38, both of which are elevated in cancer and, again, in virtually all known human disease, and especially in aging! Lower doses of niacin (or other NAD precursors such as niacinamide/nicotinamide, nicotinamide riboside (NR), nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), etc) in the <500mg daily range may be converted more easily into NAD than higher doses (such as the one used in this study) and this lower dosing regimen may be preferable in healthier people. However, in people with severe disease and/or advanced aging, the NAD-consuming pathways dominate over the synthesis ones and the inhibition of the former (and thus preventing NAD decline) may be more important than increasing NAD synthesis by a precursor. As such, there may be a context-dependent difference in needs/doses when it comes to supplementation. In healthier people interested in general prevention the lower doses of vitamin B3 (<500mg daily) seem to work better, especially for issues such as obesity and insulin resistance. For people with more serious issues, the higher doses, as used in this study (and even higher), may be a better fit due to only higher doses inhibiting the NAD-consuming pathways. Speaking of better fit, I don't think niacin is the optimal form of vitamin B3 for human usage. It is known to raise blood levels of both histamine and serotonin, which can be highly detrimental, especially in cancer cases. Niacinamide is, in my opinion, a better option, followed by the more commercially/pharmaceutically oriented NR, NMN, etc. However, since NMN is now banned by the FDA from OTC sales and NR is quite expensive, niacinamide is perhaps the only reasonable option.

And last but not least, I would like to point out that this study yet again discovered that in advanced cancer the levels of autophagy and AMPK are increased. Increasing both of these pathways remains one of the main goals and "selling points" of proponents of fasting, low-carb diets, endurance exercise, etc and is all-but officially endorsed by public health agencies such as FDA, CDC, USDA, etc. As I pointed out in several interviews, I don't think it is wise to increase these pathways until we know more about them, especially given their role in cancer, and considering the fact that some of the most promising new anti-cancer drugs are autophagy inhibitors.


"...Cachexia is a debilitating wasting syndrome and highly prevalent comorbidity in cancer patients. It manifests especially with energy and mitochondrial metabolism aberrations that promote tissue wasting. We recently identified nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) loss to associate with muscle mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer hosts. In this study we confirm that depletion of NAD+ and downregulation of Nrk2, an NAD+ biosynthetic enzyme, are common features of severe cachexia in different mouse models. Testing NAD+ repletion therapy in cachectic mice reveals that NAD+ precursor, vitamin B3 niacin, efficiently corrects tissue NAD+ levels, improves mitochondrial metabolism and ameliorates cancer- and chemotherapy-induced cachexia. In a clinical setting, we show that muscle NRK2 is downregulated in cancer patients. The low expression of NRK2 correlates with metabolic abnormalities underscoring the significance of NAD+ in the pathophysiology of human cancer cachexia. Overall, our results propose NAD+ metabolism as a therapy target for cachectic cancer patients."

"...NRKs catalyze the utilization of NAD+ precursor NR via the salvage pathway. In the skeletal muscle, Nrk2 is the most expressed isoform in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse strains as compared to Nrk1 (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Considering the Nrk2 repression in CC and the lack of a simple, translatable tool to correct Nrk2 expression, we decided to use the NAD+ booster NA, a precursor that is utilized for NAD+ biosynthesis through the Preiss-Handler pathway thus bypassing NRK218. C26-F animals were treated with a daily dose of NA (150 mg/kg) starting from day 4 after C26 implantation until day 28 (Fig. 3a). In addition to NAD+ depletion (Fig. 1a), C26-F mice presented with a significant decrease of NADH and NADPH levels while NADP+ levels were similar in comparison to controls (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Besides Nrk2 loss, C26-F mice showed an overall repression of genes involved in NAD+ biosynthesis via the salvage and Preiss-Handler pathways (Supplementary Fig. 3c) and enhanced enzyme activity of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerases (PARPs), one of the main consumers of cellular NAD+ pool operating, for example, in DNA repair (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Interestingly, NA increased skeletal muscle NAD+ and NADP+ concentrations almost to the control levels and slightly impacted on NADH and NADPH levels (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 3b). Moreover, NA supplementation improved cachexia symptoms by counteracting the loss of body weight and muscle mass and partially rescuing grasping strength (Fig. 3c–e, Supplementary Fig. 3e). Consistent with our previous report19, C26-F mice presented with decreased skeletal muscle protein synthesis, increased ratio of the active LC3B isoform (LC3B-II; Fig. 3f–h) and AMPKThr172 phosphorylation (Fig. 3f–i), suggestive of increased autophagy and energy shortage, respectively. Interestingly, both protein synthesis and LC3B-II accumulation were in part rescued by NA (Fig. 3f–h), while AMPK activation was partially prevented (Fig. 3f,i)."
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
794
@haidut

At what dosages and with what interval of time can one intervene with niacinamide in order to restore a correct balance of NADH/NAD+ NADPH/NADP? I don't have cancer but have been waiting to do a muscle biopsy to confirm or deny motor neuron damage.
I am very young but the symptoms started 10 years ago now and I have never recovered.

I have noticed episodes of remission with niacinamide that no neurologist and doctor I have consulted has been able to give me an explanation and a "why" I had such powerful and dramatic responses unfortunately only momentary. (100mg) with a meal of saturated,
carbohydrates, proteins.

When I attempted subsequent doses, I no longer had any positive response. An adaptation that took place in a short time and homeostasis restored to the starting point? it even seemed to me that the edema and the watery fat had increased together with a neuropsychiatric deterioration (methyl exhaustion ? ).
If someone could shed some light on what I wrote it would help me to have a clearer picture and the possibility of trying again with higher doses.

Are autophagy and mitophagy synonyms corresponding to FUSION? or does mitophagy refer to FISSION? This is not clear to me.

Also the current "fad" seems to inhibit MTOR to favor AMPK, are you saying that in more severe disease AMPK is upregulated? please clarify.

Thank you!

Thank you all.
 
Last edited:

aliml

Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
692
And last but not least, I would like to point out that this study yet again discovered that in advanced cancer the levels of autophagy and AMPK are increased. Increasing both of these pathways remains one of the main goals and "selling points" of proponents of fasting, low-carb diets, endurance exercise, etc and is all-but officially endorsed by public health agencies such as FDA, CDC, USDA, etc. As I pointed out in several interviews, I don't think it is wise to increase these pathways until we know more about them, especially given their role in cancer, and considering the fact that some of the most promising new anti-cancer drugs are autophagy inhibitors.
Taken together, our data suggest that inhibition of mTOR during cachexia can negatively affect autophagy; however, its activation can completely restore muscle mass and function offering an interesting new therapeutic target for cancer cachexia.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
794
@aliml One of my points referred to this, thank you, I will dedicate reading 👍🙂
 

Dr. B

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
4,346
As many of my readers know, the majority of cancer patients do not succumb from the actual tumor burden, but as a result of (usually in that order) cachexia, immunocompromise from radiation/chemotherapy, hospital-acquired infection, and/or cytokine storm after surgery for removing the tumor. Of these, cachexia is perhaps the most pernicious as its cause is considered unknown, it affects all organs/tissues, and no remedies exist to even mitigate it. Cachexia is also the main cause of death in other "wasting" conditions, including sarcopenia of advanced age, diabetes type I, untreated chronic inflammatory diseases such as Crohn's disease, multiple sclerosis, prolonged bedridden states, etc. If decline in NAD+ levels is the main reason behind cachexia in general, then the findings of this study may provide a cheap, safe and widely available remedy that can affect a significant percentage of chronically ill people worldwide. This is why I put the "cancer" word in the title in brackets, as the findings of this study likely apply to cachexia of any origin, not just cancer.

The study below demonstrates that niacin at a provably non-toxic human-equivalent dose (HED) of about 10mg/kg daily almost completely prevented the cachexia in animals with advanced human colon cancer (xenograft model). The mechanism of action was, as usual, restoring NAD+ levels (and thus the NAD/NADH ratio), which are known to be drastically lower in cancer patients...as well as people with virtually any disease (including acute/infections ones). Importantly, this high(ish) dose of niacin inhibited the major NAD-consuming enzymes such as PARP-1 and CD38, both of which are elevated in cancer and, again, in virtually all known human disease, and especially in aging! Lower doses of niacin (or other NAD precursors such as niacinamide/nicotinamide, nicotinamide riboside (NR), nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN), etc) in the <500mg daily range may be converted more easily into NAD than higher doses (such as the one used in this study) and this lower dosing regimen may be preferable in healthier people. However, in people with severe disease and/or advanced aging, the NAD-consuming pathways dominate over the synthesis ones and the inhibition of the former (and thus preventing NAD decline) may be more important than increasing NAD synthesis by a precursor. As such, there may be a context-dependent difference in needs/doses when it comes to supplementation. In healthier people interested in general prevention the lower doses of vitamin B3 (<500mg daily) seem to work better, especially for issues such as obesity and insulin resistance. For people with more serious issues, the higher doses, as used in this study (and even higher), may be a better fit due to only higher doses inhibiting the NAD-consuming pathways. Speaking of better fit, I don't think niacin is the optimal form of vitamin B3 for human usage. It is known to raise blood levels of both histamine and serotonin, which can be highly detrimental, especially in cancer cases. Niacinamide is, in my opinion, a better option, followed by the more commercially/pharmaceutically oriented NR, NMN, etc. However, since NMN is now banned by the FDA from OTC sales and NR is quite expensive, niacinamide is perhaps the only reasonable option.

And last but not least, I would like to point out that this study yet again discovered that in advanced cancer the levels of autophagy and AMPK are increased. Increasing both of these pathways remains one of the main goals and "selling points" of proponents of fasting, low-carb diets, endurance exercise, etc and is all-but officially endorsed by public health agencies such as FDA, CDC, USDA, etc. As I pointed out in several interviews, I don't think it is wise to increase these pathways until we know more about them, especially given their role in cancer, and considering the fact that some of the most promising new anti-cancer drugs are autophagy inhibitors.


"...Cachexia is a debilitating wasting syndrome and highly prevalent comorbidity in cancer patients. It manifests especially with energy and mitochondrial metabolism aberrations that promote tissue wasting. We recently identified nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) loss to associate with muscle mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer hosts. In this study we confirm that depletion of NAD+ and downregulation of Nrk2, an NAD+ biosynthetic enzyme, are common features of severe cachexia in different mouse models. Testing NAD+ repletion therapy in cachectic mice reveals that NAD+ precursor, vitamin B3 niacin, efficiently corrects tissue NAD+ levels, improves mitochondrial metabolism and ameliorates cancer- and chemotherapy-induced cachexia. In a clinical setting, we show that muscle NRK2 is downregulated in cancer patients. The low expression of NRK2 correlates with metabolic abnormalities underscoring the significance of NAD+ in the pathophysiology of human cancer cachexia. Overall, our results propose NAD+ metabolism as a therapy target for cachectic cancer patients."

"...NRKs catalyze the utilization of NAD+ precursor NR via the salvage pathway. In the skeletal muscle, Nrk2 is the most expressed isoform in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse strains as compared to Nrk1 (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Considering the Nrk2 repression in CC and the lack of a simple, translatable tool to correct Nrk2 expression, we decided to use the NAD+ booster NA, a precursor that is utilized for NAD+ biosynthesis through the Preiss-Handler pathway thus bypassing NRK218. C26-F animals were treated with a daily dose of NA (150 mg/kg) starting from day 4 after C26 implantation until day 28 (Fig. 3a). In addition to NAD+ depletion (Fig. 1a), C26-F mice presented with a significant decrease of NADH and NADPH levels while NADP+ levels were similar in comparison to controls (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Besides Nrk2 loss, C26-F mice showed an overall repression of genes involved in NAD+ biosynthesis via the salvage and Preiss-Handler pathways (Supplementary Fig. 3c) and enhanced enzyme activity of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerases (PARPs), one of the main consumers of cellular NAD+ pool operating, for example, in DNA repair (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Interestingly, NA increased skeletal muscle NAD+ and NADP+ concentrations almost to the control levels and slightly impacted on NADH and NADPH levels (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 3b). Moreover, NA supplementation improved cachexia symptoms by counteracting the loss of body weight and muscle mass and partially rescuing grasping strength (Fig. 3c–e, Supplementary Fig. 3e). Consistent with our previous report19, C26-F mice presented with decreased skeletal muscle protein synthesis, increased ratio of the active LC3B isoform (LC3B-II; Fig. 3f–h) and AMPKThr172 phosphorylation (Fig. 3f–i), suggestive of increased autophagy and energy shortage, respectively. Interestingly, both protein synthesis and LC3B-II accumulation were in part rescued by NA (Fig. 3f–h), while AMPK activation was partially prevented (Fig. 3f,i)."
Good post, I thought aspirin increases AMPK though, and several other supplements/substances boost AMPK? Also doesnt vitamin K2 boost autophagy
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
794
@haidut

At what dosages and with what interval of time can one intervene with niacinamide in order to restore a correct balance of NADH/NAD+ NADPH/NADP? I don't have cancer but have been waiting to do a muscle biopsy to confirm or deny motor neuron damage.
I am very young but the symptoms started 10 years ago now and I have never recovered.

I have noticed episodes of remission with niacinamide that no neurologist and doctor I have consulted has been able to give me an explanation and a "why" I had such powerful and dramatic responses unfortunately only momentary. (100mg) with a meal of saturated,
carbohydrates, proteins.

When I attempted subsequent doses, I no longer had any positive response. An adaptation that took place in a short time and homeostasis restored to the starting point? it even seemed to me that the edema and the watery fat had increased together with a neuropsychiatric deterioration (methyl exhaustion ? ).
If someone could shed some light on what I wrote it would help me to have a clearer picture and the possibility of trying again with higher doses.

Are autophagy and mitophagy synonyms corresponding to FUSION? or does mitophagy refer to FISSION? This is not clear to me.

Also the current "fad" seems to inhibit MTOR to favor AMPK, are you saying that in more severe disease AMPK is upregulated? please clarify.

Thank you!

Thank you all.
I haven't had any further clarifications on the matter, if anyone could help me it would be very useful for my next experiments 🙂👍
 

Dr. B

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
4,346
@Highserotonin90 so should AMPK boosting supplements or products be avoided and mTOR ones favored? Which supplements should be avoided and which should be used to boost mtor?

Niacinamide if i use 500mg doses consistently, it causes bad skin reactions and bloating and water retention.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
794
@Dr. B If you look at Rapamycin, it does the complete opposite, that is, by inhibiting mTOR, it facilitates the recovery of muscle mass in older subjects suffering from cachexia... but it is a different context from cachexia resulting from cancer or having muscular dystrophy. We need to understand if you have a suppressed or hyperactive mTOR... and the AMPK situation is not clear to me whether Haidut claims that in cancer or degenerative diseases it is over expressed and should be blocked or increased.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2018
Messages
794
@Dr. B Have you tried niacin? I'm trying to experiment again at the moment 250mg does not cause any flush or symptoms of high serotonin / histamine... I will continue to increase until both negative and positive symptoms appear (energy, recovery of muscle tone etc.) always monitoring sleep, digestion and mood etc, blood sugar... I find niacinamide more effective in small and frequent doses.
 

Dr. B

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2021
Messages
4,346
@Dr. B Have you tried niacin? I'm trying to experiment again at the moment 250mg does not cause any flush or symptoms of high serotonin / histamine... I will continue to increase until both negative and positive symptoms appear (energy, recovery of muscle tone etc.) always monitoring sleep, digestion and mood etc, blood sugar... I find niacinamide more effective in small and frequent doses.

I did try niacin long ago, 100mg daily, alongside 40mg or 60mg niacinamide. It didnt cause skin issues, but i got skin issues from 500mg niacinamide daily.
100mg niacinamide I would probably do okay too. The niacin caused histamine intolerance symptoms though, I would get a runny nose even from having cottage cheese, ricotta cheese and vinegar and other things. It also caused some other symptoms like fatigue.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom