stargazer1111
Member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2017
- Messages
- 425
All starch and fiber are disastrous for me at this point. My diet now consists of whole milk, ice cream, meat, juice, table sugar/soda, coconut oil. Nothing more, nothing less.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Estrogen is excitotoxic and also elevates prolactin and other pituitary hormones. Estrogen is known to cause insatiable and risky sexual behavior in females (no judgment passed whatsoever) so its effects on the brain and pituitary are likely the main reason for this. Ray mentioned it a few times as well.
Excessive sexuality in poor environment is also well-documented in both humans and animals, possibly as a way to ensure procreation when life expectancy is low. This is probably the main reasons why "education" programs in poor areas/countries to try and convince people to delay child bearing have failed miserably - i.e. people will procreate excessively (or at least behave along those lines) if they feel the environment does not portend good life ahead of them. I don't know if estrogen is always the main mechanism but it does seem very likely as people in such conditions often have weight issues and diabetes (not talking about starvation conditions as in 3rd world countries) and estrogen is the main driver in those along with cortisol. And they are both elevated under stress and unfavorable conditions in general.
There is some kind of weird obsession with homosexuality on this board... Specifically with trying to show that it's unnatural or abnormal. What gives? I'm not sure what this sort of study is supposed to accomplish? Would you post something that shows that Jewish people are more likely to be autistic or that African Americans are more likely to be born with autoimmune conditions because their mothers smoked crack? No. You wouldn't. Perhaps posts that are "showing" that homosexuality is a choice or that homosexual people are the product of sickness (the study that was posted that hypothyroid women tend to have gay kids) aren't doing the gays any good. Idiots in the world don't need more reasons outside of Jesus to hate the gays. My god.
Yep, basically if a country wants to reduce teen birth rates it should raise their living standards. Everything else is a waste of time/money, especially the efforts to do "sex-ed" for those people. Lol, they probably know a lot more about sex than the people teaching it :)
Teen birth rates would probably be hire if people had more financial independence. Family formation would go back, for many, to what it was for wealthy people in the past, very early. Stress over money and career causes people (like myself) to put off family formation into 30s.
Yes, for most people except the very poor who tend to give birth very early and more than people who are better off. It's probably a U-curve - highest birth rate for the very poor and the well-off.
Yep, basically if a country wants to reduce teen birth rates it should raise their living standards. Everything else is a waste of time/money, especially the efforts to do "sex-ed" for those people. Lol, they probably know a lot more about sex than the people teaching it :)
Well I think a big part of the question is, what is the best way to go about raising living standards? That seems to be a high priority in politics, at least its a major talking point, yet conservatives for example would say its through rugged individualism and a free market, while liberals would say its through a socialized economy and government programs....
I think most of the problem goes down to the monetary system and how money is created (as interest-bearing debt), rather than any political ideology. This system requires constant "growth" and continual monetization of things that used to be part of the Commons. Under such a system, I think it's inevitable that the less well-off, as a whole, will become even more less well-off. (I refrain from using the term "poor", as I'm not talking about just abject poverty)
Reforming the monetary system would be priority number one, IMO. I don't have hope for either major political party here in the US, as both are cheerleaders for economic growth, which just boils down to the care and feeding of money system. There is an "End the Fed" minority, but I don't think that goes far enough.
My personality has totally changed. Even the music I want to listen to has changed since removing the fiber and the vitamin A. I can also feel stuff going on in the gut that might reflect a change in the balance of the gut flora.
They'd actually love it since gender fluidity is trendy nowI’m afraid if I even tried to bring this forward as an actual hypothesis at a university, I would be smeared and my career would be destroyed.
The main issue with a privately owned banking system is that the supply of money is controlled by insiders and insider institutions who can use their knowledge to make obscene amounts of profit at the expense of the average man. This has happened in just about every market crash and economic downturn since 1913. The insiders get out at the top and then are able to scoop up corporations at pennies on the dollar after the crash.Could you elaborate on the problems you see with the monetary system? What are some specific things with our kind of currency that you believe hinder the working classes?
Could you elaborate on the problems you see with the monetary system? What are some specific things with our kind of currency that you believe hinder the working classes?
I think my point is that the study authors themselves have some sort of bias they are working with. I think folks study a lot of things that really have little important implication in the real world. Additionally, such studies support weirdo outliers who are always looking for a reason to hate people who are different from them.Why wouldn't you post about any topic as long as it's true information? Is political correctness more important than that?
I think most of the problem goes down to the monetary system and how money is created (as interest-bearing debt), rather than any political ideology. This system requires constant "growth" and continual monetization of things that used to be part of the Commons. Under such a system, I think it's inevitable that the less well-off, as a whole, will become even more less well-off. (I refrain from using the term "poor", as I'm not talking about just abject poverty)
Reforming the monetary system would be priority number one, IMO. I don't have hope for either major political party here in the US, as both are cheerleaders for economic growth, which just boils down to the care and feeding of money system. There is an "End the Fed" minority, but I don't think that goes far enough.