What-a-Riot
Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 154
He's anti-PUFA for sure, but he may also feel a responsibility to push an extreme viewpoint because of the mass acceptance of the "facts" of "healthy fats." I mean one day he's calling out avocados for being potentially carcinogenic and liver toxic, another he's actively condoning a meal of salmon avocado and rice as a healthy macronutrient balance with nary a mention of PUFA.
Peat thinks everyone should think. Of course we're here in part because of a respect for his research and philosophy, so we care what he thinks, but I think he'd cringe to see his name invoked under the assumption that it should be considered as evidence
EDIT
I think "peat thinks" should be taken as evidence that there is most likely evidence to be found. I'm not trying to cause a fuss or make any accusation with all this, this is just something I think about and I think should be said from time to time
Peat thinks everyone should think. Of course we're here in part because of a respect for his research and philosophy, so we care what he thinks, but I think he'd cringe to see his name invoked under the assumption that it should be considered as evidence
EDIT
I think "peat thinks" should be taken as evidence that there is most likely evidence to be found. I'm not trying to cause a fuss or make any accusation with all this, this is just something I think about and I think should be said from time to time