Kickboxer Andrew Tate explains why “Corona doesn’t exist for rich people”.......TRUTH BOMBS

[area51puy]

He was arrested, but not Fauci who is responsible for the plandemic and the authoritarian lock downs. The thing I learned the past few years is 90 percent of the population is for authoritarian society if it is against the side they disagree with or for what they fear. I was shocked about the amount of authoritarians here when it was against their side.

Andrew tate used a lot of hyperbole to express a point and for entertainment and essentially click bait in a short attention society. He basically used trumps playbook.

I think what he said was so shocking to so many people is because of the years a bpa in plastic bottles.

Basically his thoughts and words were the standard feelings of men before 1980 when men’s testosterone levels started declining.

 

[Xin]

He was arrested, but not Fauci who is responsible for the plandemic and the authoritarian lock downs. The thing I learned the past few years is 90 percent of the population is for authoritarian society if it is against the side they disagree with or for what they fear. I was shocked about the amount of authoritarians here when it was against their side.

Andrew tate used a lot of hyperbole to express a point and for entertainment and essentially click bait in a short attention society. He basically used trumps playbook.

I think what he said was so shocking to so many people is because of the years a bpa in plastic bottles.

Basically his thoughts and words were the standard feelings of men before 1980 when men’s testosterone levels started declining.

It's still standard feeling in most of eastern Europe and the Middle East. I've listen to some of his podcasts and although he's provocative, his main message is positive. It was just a matter of time before they jailed him or worse.

 

[area51puy]

I think what people miss about Andrew tate and the whole red pill community is evolutionarily women are attracted and seek the most dominant males in society as their looks can afford them.

Which makes sense if you are the wife of the leader of the tribe and he is respected or feared by others in your tribe , village or society. That will offer resources and protection to the women and their children.

Well in those societies one powerful man would have many women. It would be better to be one of the many wives and have his resources and protection then the one wife of a loyal peasant.

Then as farming culture and the Christian and Muslim religions took over society and it pretty much said one man and one woman and woman that step outside of this were shamed by the society and women were very vulnerable to this because if you were banished from society it would ultimately lead to death. So your survival meant being loyal to that one man if he was a peasant or a king.

So now we are in current times were women can survive on their own and get employment that can provide shelter for them and their children and even if they can’t the government will.



But if in society where every woman survival is dependent on being loyal to one man, they will do all they can to protect that and be very picky with the man they choose if they had even had a choice.

and for men evolutionarily was to have sex with as many women as you can for the best chance for your genes to be past on.

So for a man to get a woman, it was by force, so war and one tribe killing the men of another tribe or finding ways to be the prominent members of that society or tribe.

So what we have today is thousands of years of religion shaping society of one man, one woman and women remaining virgins until marriage.

But today a woman will not be banished to the forest for having premarital sex. If she has sex with many men she will not be stoned to death.

So todays women do not need a man to survive but it’s helps.

So many women today are seeking good looking men, men with status, and men with as many resources as possible.

Very few men obtain all. So women spend their 20’s seeking the man with all.

And many men seek to have sex with as many women as possible.

So women will find a man with it all and end up just being used for sex.

Or have relationships with guys that has 1 or 2 of the 3 but begin to resent the many for lacking 1 or 2 of the others.

So they have a guy that makes a good living but isn’t very good looking. And then will cheat or leave him for the good looking guy.

Or have a good looking guy they are physically attracted too but then realize he will never afford them the life style she wants.

And status depends on the perception of the woman and what point she is in her life . So being captain of the highschool football team , her boss at Denny’s to the Ceo of a major corporation or celebrity.

Well as women in there 20’s seek men with as many of these qualities as possible and as much as possible. They find these men will have sex with them, or have short term relationships with them but will never marry them, the most they may get is unplanned babies.

So you end up with 80 percent of women dating 20 percent of the men in a hookup culture.

So now you have a bunch of women who hate men because they are essentially being mistreated and used for sex and bunch of men that can’t get a woman and these people end up resenting the other sex.

And this was designed by the central planners.
Gloria Steinem was in the CIA and she is the feminist that was propped up. Divide and conquer. Pit women against men along with the wedge issues in society like race ,religion etc.

But where is a better place to put a divide in, but in the home. Or a preventing that home from happening. So we are become a societies of individuals and not families and good way to have depopulation.

So you have a society of people only looking out for themselves, not them and their families.

And Tate is playing a character. He is essentially telling women if sexual revolution of feminism is what you want this will ultimately be the result.

Broken families , being a side chicks, cheated on with a side chick and used for sex and all the emotional damage that comes with it.

He is essentially showing you the reality, not the stuff portrayed in movies books. They say Don’t kill the messenger. But that’s what the central planners are trying to do.

They can’t have men and women waking up and realize we’re are not are enemies.

 

[SamYo123]

I think what people miss about Andrew tate and the whole red pill community is evolutionarily women are attracted and seek the most dominant males in society as their looks can afford them.

Which makes sense if you are the wife of the leader of the tribe and he is respected or feared by others in your tribe , village or society. That will offer resources and protection to the women and their children.

Well in those societies one powerful man would have many women. It would be better to be one of the many wives and have his resources and protection then the one wife of a loyal peasant.

Then as farming culture and the Christian and Muslim religions took over society and it pretty much said one man and one woman and woman that step outside of this were shamed by the society and women were very vulnerable to this because if you were banished from society it would ultimately lead to death. So your survival meant being loyal to that one man if he was a peasant or a king.

So now we are in current times were women can survive on their own and get employment that can provide shelter for them and their children and even if they can’t the government will.



But if in society where every woman survival is dependent on being loyal to one man, they will do all they can to protect that and be very picky with the man they choose if they had even had a choice.

and for men evolutionarily was to have sex with as many women as you can for the best chance for your genes to be past on.

So for a man to get a woman, it was by force, so war and one tribe killing the men of another tribe or finding ways to be the prominent members of that society or tribe.

So what we have today is thousands of years of religion shaping society of one man, one woman and women remaining virgins until marriage.

But today a woman will not be banished to the forest for having premarital sex. If she has sex with many men she will not be stoned to death.

So todays women do not need a man to survive but it’s helps.

So many women today are seeking good looking men, men with status, and men with as many resources as possible.

Very few men obtain all. So women spend their 20’s seeking the man with all.

And many men seek to have sex with as many women as possible.

So women will find a man with it all and end up just being used for sex.

Or have relationships with guys that has 1 or 2 of the 3 but begin to resent the many for lacking 1 or 2 of the others.

So they have a guy that makes a good living but isn’t very good looking. And then will cheat or leave him for the good looking guy.

Or have a good looking guy they are physically attracted too but then realize he will never afford them the life style she wants.

And status depends on the perception of the woman and what point she is in her life . So being captain of the highschool football team , her boss at Denny’s to the Ceo of a major corporation or celebrity.

Well as women in there 20’s seek men with as many of these qualities as possible and as much as possible. They find these men will have sex with them, or have short term relationships with them but will never marry them, the most they may get is unplanned babies.

So you end up with 80 percent of women dating 20 percent of the men in a hookup culture.

So now you have a bunch of women who hate men because they are essentially being mistreated and used for sex and bunch of men that can’t get a woman and these people end up resenting the other sex.

And this was designed by the central planners.
Gloria Steinem was in the CIA and she is the feminist that was propped up. Divide and conquer. Pit women against men along with the wedge issues in society like race ,religion etc.

But where is a better place to put a divide in, but in the home. Or a preventing that home from happening. So we are become a societies of individuals and not families and good way to have depopulation.

So you have a society of people only looking out for themselves, not them and their families.

And Tate is playing a character. He is essentially telling women if sexual revolution of feminism is what you want this will ultimately be the result.

Broken families , being a side chicks, cheated on with a side chick and used for sex and all the emotional damage that comes with it.

He is essentially showing you the reality, not the stuff portrayed in movies books. They say Don’t kill the messenger. But that’s what the central planners are trying to do.

They can’t have men and women waking up and realize we’re are not are enemies.

Now give every man a sex doll....

 

[ThinPicking]

What's funny to me is that none of what you've written matters in any way.

Of course it matters Mr Stoic . That it allegedly doesn't matter to you would be a personal issue if it were actually true.

Tate's public statements, whether authentic and intelligent or not, are in clear opposition to most globalist agendas, from feminism to veganism, from COVID to climate change, and several other related elite plans.

As such, his influence on young men should be an obvious threat to the elites' plans – unless of course you believe that he is a paid actor, which doesn't make much sense as it's certainly being counterproductive.

What's funny to me is that you may actually think this.

You're in the middle of a multilevel deception. If you want to pin your vision where it is that's fine. But you've heard nothing from "Tate" much of his audience wasn't already thinking or liable to think, at the exact moment his heavy "social media" promotion began. Thinking or liable to think, in far more critical and constructive terms. All he's doing is attempting to derail the observers cognitive faculties.

Any "influence" he may appear to have on "young men" will lead them up the garden path and nowhere else. I think you know that really. Hence "should be an obvious threat".

His income or remit are of no concern to me. I'm just making a psychological study of both sides of his believers. And having a laugh in the process. If I had to paint him I'd say he's a deeply troubled attention hoar with a good agent. A tool.

Happy new year Mr Stoic. God be with you.

 

[ThinPicking]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FISZLM801-c


View: https://youtu.be/bDMd88L61lw


New flavour of the month is one "Pearl Davis" who's appeared on Zuby's podcast and hosted him on hers. These people are divisive slime.