x-ray peat
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 2,343
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
California trees have speedily *burp* evolved to be flame retardant in response to all of the damn fires.
I was joking, but if by accident I stated some truth, it wasn't intentional.Nature's revenge. Trees do walk. Houses don't?
Aren't the giant Sequoia trees known to have survived fires and have been able to continue to grow through time? They have barks that are basically fire-retardant. So it's conceivable that the trees that have survived bear the same characteristics as the Sequoias.
That is true but I dont think that is what is going on here. Even though many trees can survive a forest fire they dont end up looking like they havent been touched at all. They would have lost all there leaves and smaller branches plus be heavily scarred with burn marks and soot. These trees and bushes look like nothing happened. Also it doesnt begin to explain how a house can be burned and completely destroyed along a precisely straight line leaving the other half untouched, as shown in the first video. The old saying that there are no straight lines in nature applies.Nature's revenge. Trees do walk. Houses don't?
Aren't the giant Sequoia trees known to have survived fires and have been able to continue to grow through time? They have barks that are basically fire-retardant. So it's conceivable that the trees that have survived bear the same characteristics as the Sequoias.
lol, Whose afraid of Such Saturation Wolf?Try using bricks instead lmao
That is true but I dont think that is what is going on here. Even though many trees can survive a forest fire they dont end up looking like they havent been touched at all. They would have lost all there leaves and smaller branches plus be heavily scarred with burn marks and soot. These trees and bushes look like nothing happened. Also it doesnt begin to explain how a house can be burned and completely destroyed along a precisely straight line leaving the other half untouched, as shown in the first video. The old saying that there are no straight lines in nature applies.
The youtube sleuths are blaming it on directed energy weaponry to move people out of the rural areas as laid out in the UN's agenda 21.
Breathes inlol, Whose afraid of Such Saturation Wolf?
How can they be built correctly?Breathes in
Wooden buildings can last longer in a fire than cement structures, if they are built correctly
I'm not sure. But the Germans have the marketing down to a T as they are good at wooden homing. Their argument is that it burns, but burns much more predictably, being slower and "us" having more experience with it. In any case, you have to clear the building. I attach the video I saw.How can they be built correctly?
I'm not sure. But the Germans have the marketing down to a T as they are good at wooden homing. Their argument is that it burns, but burns much more predictably, being slower and "us" having more experience with it. In any case, you have to clear the building. I attach the video I saw.
Sorry OP, this is bologna.
Explained: Unburned trees next to burned down structures as evidence of secret "energy weapons"
Structures are significantly more flammable than live trees. This exact thing has been an observable trait of California forest fires for as long as aerial photography has existed...
I've grown weary of the complacency of conspiracy theorists on this forum. Posts like this one ultimately tarnish the credibility of Ray Peat's crucial work in biology. I recommend seeking an alternative forum for half-baked posts of uncredited youtube videos.
That’s interesting because I’m getting tired of all the so called “conspiracy theory” debunkers cherry picking one piece of evidence, supposedly debunking that, and then falsely thinking they have debunked everything. It’s called strawmanning, and that is exactly what all these “debunking“sites like metabunk, snopes, quackwatch specialize in.Sorry OP, this is bologna.
Explained: Unburned trees next to burned down structures as evidence of secret "energy weapons"
Structures are significantly more flammable than live trees. This exact thing has been an observable trait of California forest fires for as long as aerial photography has existed...
I've grown weary of the complacency of conspiracy theorists on this forum. Posts like this one ultimately tarnish the credibility of Ray Peat's crucial work in biology. I recommend seeking an alternative forum for half-baked posts of uncredited youtube videos.
Thanks. Very good interview putting it all in context.Deborah Taveres: Geo-Engineered Fires, Property Scams & Seizures
Deborah Taveres: Geo-Engineered Fires, Property Scams & Seizures