Ray Peat has emphasised the importance of calcium-phosphorus ratio for our metabolism and overall welfare. And indeed, when one looks at standard diet, one sees too much phosphorus.
But suppose one does not want to supplement calcium but only eat natural food sources. Doesn't it leave only milk as having a good ratio? If one eats lots of meat there will be major imbalance. Probably the best animal protein sources should be milk and gelatine, right? The problem for me is that milk doesn't give me any satiation as it is a liquid. What about replacing meat with quark or cottage cheese? They have more phosphorus than calcium, but at least they have a sizeable amount of calcium as of opposed to meat which has very little. Would that be an option? Or should one rather supplement calcium? Would calcium glycinate be a good source?
But suppose one does not want to supplement calcium but only eat natural food sources. Doesn't it leave only milk as having a good ratio? If one eats lots of meat there will be major imbalance. Probably the best animal protein sources should be milk and gelatine, right? The problem for me is that milk doesn't give me any satiation as it is a liquid. What about replacing meat with quark or cottage cheese? They have more phosphorus than calcium, but at least they have a sizeable amount of calcium as of opposed to meat which has very little. Would that be an option? Or should one rather supplement calcium? Would calcium glycinate be a good source?