Via Harvard2TheBigHouse.Substack.com,
A Grin Without a Cat
Bottling-Up the Quasispecies Origins of SARS-CoV-2’s Enigmatic Furin-Cleavage Site.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
I was just thinking about this article. Terrifying. It took a lot of energy to read it. We, husband, read it in parts. Made it tolerable. I have to read it again. It was re-printed in zero-hedge.... Probably worthwhile comments there !!Really?
That's right. Thanks Vileplume. You know I've always read your name as "Viteplume" !I've only read the sections that you've excerpted in this thread, Birdie, but it sounds like what the virologist Geert Vanden Bossche has been saying, about why vaccinating an entire population--especially once the virus has already spread--is a terrible idea that just makes the virus more dangerous.
His newsletter touches on some of those ideas: Home | Voice for Science and Solidarity
Haha! I like it. Like "vitality" or "vitamin."That's right. Thanks Vileplume. You know I've always read your name as "Viteplume" !
+1 for ideas.A zero-hedge commenter says:
In an incredibly obscure way, this article explains why they want everyone vaccinated. A different take on what many here have been saying for a year -- get rid of the control group (the unvaccinated) because the vaccinated are the ones who are going to be the greatest victims of the virus as it mutates.
If you have no control group, the vaccinated will assume the virus is just really, really bad and is "breaking through." Hard to sell that narrative when the unvaccinated are all running around being fine.
Thanks for the heads up! This ties a lot together. Gain of function is always going on; they just oft it as defensive research and not bio-weaponry.@Grapelander - Have you seen this article?
Wow.... Last paragraph. Yep I agree, rings true.From the co-author of the first peer-reviewed paper examining a laboratory origin for SARS-CoV-2, as well as its addendum, which formally linked the H1N1 Spanish Flu pandemic strain release of 1977 to gain-of-function research.
It’s something we seem to be particularly good at, since all the way back in 1977 when the first H1N1 LAV emerged to a mass global panic, a massive push was made to create and distribute vaccines against what was thought to be a potentially pandemic strain. But it turns out that one of the ways a LAV isn’t a natural virus, is that when you attempt to vaccinate against it, neurological side-effects appear to proliferate among the vaccinated population, as the virus blows through this attempt at protection.
Because unfortunately for all of us, this isn’t the first time we’ve all been down the horrific rabbit-hole of trying to rush out an incredibly profitable vaccine against an enigmatic mystery virus that’s really a military LAV that deattenuated faster than expected. A vaccine which only provides only weak and temporary protection - but also causes wide-spread side-effects because it turns out the pharmaceutical companies were lying about their vaccine studies, and knowingly risked the lives and livelihoods of tens of millions of Americans so they could make as much money as quickly as possible:
Yes. That's our job here isn't it. Important to keep the goal in sight. Always that..@Birdie yeah, it is clear that they don't want a damm control group. But they will have it so **** them.
Regarding the shedding... too uncertain still. I am super pesimistic about it in the sense that if these vaxxes are not already self replicant, will be at some point, so we will all end up vaxxed. BUT since this is not too much about if the vaxx is bad or not but about submission, control, 2030 agenda and stuff... it is important to still rebel against it, even if the vaxx would be as safe as an aspirin.
What I understand is that the author suggests that the "virus" which is lab manipulated deattenuates back to its' original form. I personally do not understand what is meant by 'original form' as they have been experimenting (serial passage) for years and now with Crisper they have gone completely mad. Which iteration is it going back to?It seems with or without the vaccines the covid virus is evolving back to its most dangerous virulence.