Drareg
Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 4,772
I think he is implying the original form which was far deadlier, they weakened it to make a vaccine and this is what became covid19, the genome isn’t fully activated, he believes like Peat that life evolves toward higher complexity which is why some vaccines can find their back to full activation of its original genome via swarming, a quantum effect.What I understand is that the author suggests that the "virus" which is lab manipulated deattenuates back to its' original form. I personally do not understand what is meant by 'original form' as they have been experimenting (serial passage) for years and now with Crisper they have gone completely mad. Which iteration is it going back to?
Excuse my ignorance but I am just trying to take in all this complex science.... world events, coup d'état, etc. It is an interesting take on the LAV vaccine production failure, and the failure of the scientists/industry/politics to follow through and 'first do no harm'. We are way beyond that now.
Dr. David Martin in a video from earlier this year states,"It is Computer simulated synthetic chimeric computer generated code." So Chimeric? Hmmmm.
If the so-called "Swine Flu" grabbing of 2009 is actually a recombinant, or "split-influenza" virus consisting of A-strain Bird-Flu (H5N1), Swine Flu (H1N1) and multiple strains of human flu (H3N2). FLU 2009 is a Link: Then what is going on now is a multi-headed hydra.
From @Birdie Harvard substack link Via Harvard2TheBigHouse.Substack.com,:
"But okay, the FCS can be almost entirely lost without all the immune challenges posed by a full host, but then how did it get there in the first place? The exact same way the H5N1 strains “gained” it during the 2012 experiments with ferrets and influenza: It was always there to begin with. "
and
"“In 1997, small fragments of viral RNA were obtained for sequence analysis from an autopsy sample of a victim of the 1918 influenza. The initial characterization of the virus confirmed the H1N1 subtype and demonstrated that the 1918 HA did not possess the cleavage site mutation seen in the lethal H5 and H7 viruses. This finding eliminated the HA cleavage site mutation as an appealing explanation for the virulent behavior of the 1918 virus.”
and
"So in the many months since the COVID-19 Pandemic began, it’s abundantly clear the people who started it and are profiting the most from it have instructed the media not to talk about “serial passage” at all, nor the past links to vaccine research and past viral outbreaks, including the 1977 H1N1 outbreak linked to military vaccine gain-of-function work as well as the 2009 H1N1 endemic, both likely from serially passaged LAVs that were able to make their way back to full strength much faster than the scientists who designed them anticipated."
Does serial passage mean gain of function? Chimeric?
Again from Harvard Substack: "A Dutch team lead by Dr. Ron Fouchier conducted a similar study, in this one they also took this H5N1 influenza strain, but instead of making a chimeric Frankenvirus with genes from H1N1, alternatively but to a similar effect: they jacked it full of mutagens to accelerate the evolutionary process, and then also let it run amok through a whole bunch of lab ferrets in a similar set-up - watching to see which strains were eventually able to establish airborne transmission among the critters."
I think serial passage means through live tissue, in vivo, live organisms are needed to fully develop the virus, the virus uses the metabolic energy of each tissue to amplify itself, it needs to access the cells each time so evolves the mechanism to do so by accessing its original genome, this goes on until maximum complexity is reached, what is genetically determined some would say, it may if evolve to even more complexity by developing its genome even further once at a maximum, it could adapt another virus into it, it’s evolving intelligently with purpose is what he implies I think, this is why I would be interested in Peats view.