Men Should Ejaculate at Least 21 Times a Month To Slash Their Prostate Cancer Risk

[stoic]

Hé has his n=1,he is the no fap evangelist.i did no fap for 7 years,as I felt absolutely crap after masturbation and it wasn’t pleasurable anymore, because it didn’t make me more masculine a single atom

Yeah, anecdotal evidence isn't evidence at all, especially when you pick and choose a few anecdotes while conveniently excluding the ones you don't like.

Anecdotally, I feel better when I masturbate before bed, especially with porn. I have PFS though, so my hormonal system might work differently.

 

[Razvan]

There is men’s that don’t no fap or practice semen retention and looks behave and sound 10 times more masculin that 99% of no fappers

Yes, no fap and semeb restrictions Is bull****. Mostly nuerotic loosers that have low androgenic profile and low bone density do It.
The only true benefit Is lowered prolactin.

 

[Nomane Euger]

Yes, no fap and semeb restrictions Is bull****. Mostly nuerotic loosers that have low androgenic profile and low bone density do It.
The only true benefit Is lowered prolactin.

you can reach a point where fapping make you feel worst than you felt before,and you can reach a point of health where just thinking about sex make you feel more masculin,at the worst of my health masturbation destroyed me.also for me it has a huge Influence on my dreams,negatively if I masturbate,not if I have sex with women’s

 

[miquelangeles]

There many reasons to reduce ejaculation frequency supported by research, but at least from a Peat perspective, excessive activation of the endorphin and oxytocin system should be avoided.

Can anyone post some studies in support of frequent masturbation besides this one?

 

[Lumalux]

I'm pretty sure this 21 times recommendation is only for unemployed and those who stay home frequently.

21 times really is a lot. Yes, I know there's 30 days in a month, but it's still excessive, when I do ejaculate I feel the good(dopamine) and bad(oxytocin) effects for a few days, I definitely don't need to ejaculate for at least a few days until I may feel that urge building up again. I do think if you're fapping daily because you "have to" this is likely related to some kind of childhood trauma, not high libido.

There is simply not enough time in a month to masturbate if you're still going to work, running errands, etc. unless you're doing it in public restrooms ?

Take into consideration how much time you can lose doing the actual jerkoffs and then sometime you need an aftercum nap.

I think it's actually gross to force so much masturbation on someone LOL.

I literally can do the deed, from onset of arousal to release, in about 30 seconds so time is not a factor for me.

 

[Explorer]

Maybe possible for people without the post orgasmic illness syndrome but not for me lol

I wonder do none of you get those weird memory issues, the weird tighter diapraghm, that lethargic feeling, brain fog etc. for 2-3 days after orgasming?

Even if I reduce it to 1-2 weeks each time I orgasm/ejaculate I will still need to wait for that post-orgasm 1-3 day hangover period to pass so I choose to orgasm as little as possible so I don't have to go through that terrible mast cell attack, vagus nerve imbalance I have each time after ejaculating

 

[stoic]

There many reasons to reduce ejaculation frequency supported by research, but at least from a Peat perspective, excessive activation of the endorphin and oxytocin system should be avoided.

Can anyone post some studies in support of frequent masturbation besides this one?

This whole community is focused on why and how we should reduce stress and stress hormones.

Just as undereating and overexercising is damaging and causes unnecessary stress, the same can be argued about refraining from sex or masturbation when your body tells you to.

Ejaculating based on your sex drive is probably healthier in the long run.

 

[Explorer]

There many reasons to reduce ejaculation frequency supported by research, but at least from a Peat perspective, excessive activation of the endorphin and oxytocin system should be avoided.

Can anyone post some studies in support of frequent masturbation besides this one?

I always have this zoned out over puffy kind of mental feeling almost as if opioids/oxytocin/endorphins floated my whole body the next day after orgasm and it feels prolactinerg-ish in a sense too even Coffee+L-Tyrosine doesn't get rid of it fully, maybe Aspirin seems to slightly dissipate it but I just don't understand are there genuinely people out there who just do not notice that terrible 1-3 day post-ejaculation hangover?

I have a lot more drive/energy/focus/body and mind toning the longer I abstain, orgasm/ejaculation sort of puffs/loosens the body making it floaty and disorganized and same for the mental effects I become more directionless/harder to focus on what my goals were/memorize things etc.

I understand that those without those symptoms view nofap/semen retention as a weird thing

BUT I simply have not been able to ever have an orgasm/ejaculation my WHOLE life EXCEPT 1 time in 2020 February while sick with a cold when that hangover didnt appear and I felt same after like before so maybe its some immune reaction to an extent

 

[Lumalux]

This whole community is focused on why and how we should reduce stress and stress hormones.

Just as undereating and overexercising is damaging and causes unnecessary stress, the same can be argued about refraining from sex or masturbation when your body tells you to.

Ejaculating based on your sex drive is probably healthier in the long run.

Totally agree. For me, ejaculating reduces stress, like releasing a pressure valve. Sometimes I can go 3-4 times a day and not feel sated, and others it will be weeks before I am interested again. If it feels good and it doesn't wreck you afterwards, then indulge.

 

[SOMO]

I literally can do the deed, from onset of arousal to release, in about 30 seconds so time is not a factor for me.

I don't think 30 seconds is natural.

Those little monkeys do it for longer than that in the wild and in captivitiy, so even when they fap for recreational purposes, they don't rush it.

Just because you CAN doesn't mean you SHOULD.

Anyway without a proper examination of the penis I don't know how much inpub I can give as to whether you're masturbating properly.

Yes, no fap and semeb restrictions Is bull****. Mostly nuerotic loosers that have low androgenic profile and low bone density do It.
The only true benefit Is lowered prolactin.

Lowered Prolactin IS an important benefit. And Prolactin is one of the few hormones that have quite noticeable physical effects, so I think that's nothing to scoff at.

The main benefit is that a lot of energy is spent to produce semen and when that semen is released, that's a lot of energy "lost" unless you engage in "Autophagy." LOL

Semen is made up of polyamines, and the amount of research on polyamines is lacking, but what we do know if that they're powerful chemical messengers that can have real biological on organs like the heart and prostate. They may be beneficial for the heart, but detrimental to the prostate.

 

[pauljacob]

Looks like a study funded by Pornhub. Semen is life energy. Spilling it frequently is committing slow suicide. And that's the good news. The bad news is it depletes physical and mental energies a man needs to move forward and achieve. Anyway, the body ejects semen when it needs to.

 

[Homo Consumericus]

"Men Should Ejaculate at Least 21 Times a Month To Slash Their Prostate Cancer Risk(!!)"​

Ok coomer

 

[Nomane Euger]

"Men Should Ejaculate at Least 21 Times a Month To Slash Their Prostate Cancer Risk(!!)"​

Ok coomer


View attachment 26220

Aaaaaahahahaha

 

[Homo Consumericus]

Aaaaaahahahaha

 

[Lumalux]

I don't think 30 seconds is natural.

Those little monkeys do it for longer than that in the wild and in captivitiy, so even when they fap for recreational purposes, they don't rush it.

Just because you CAN doesn't mean you SHOULD.

Anyway without a proper examination of the penis I don't know how much inpub I can give as to whether you're masturbating properly.



Lowered Prolactin IS an important benefit. And Prolactin is one of the few hormones that have quite noticeable physical effects, so I think that's nothing to scoff at.

The main benefit is that a lot of energy is spent to produce semen and when that semen is released, that's a lot of energy "lost" unless you engage in "Autophagy." LOL

Semen is made up of polyamines, and the amount of research on polyamines is lacking, but what we do know if that they're powerful chemical messengers that can have real biological on organs like the heart and prostate. They may be beneficial for the heart, but detrimental to the prostate.

I can last 30 seconds or 30 minutes. It's just that I have the ability to go from zero to sixty really fast if the situation warrants it. I agree that quickies are not always the most pleasurable.

 

[tfcjesse]

Everyone must learn at their own pace

 

[mariantos]

Men's Health Magazine - might as well read Playboy, at least it doesn't pretend to care for your health.

+1

Yes, no fap and semeb restrictions Is bull****. Mostly nuerotic loosers that have low androgenic profile and low bone density do It.
The only true benefit Is lowered prolactin.

You are too young to understand how harmful masturbation is. There are people who are much more physically developed than you who refrain from this practice that is degrading not only physically. From the reports of many I noticed that they are also mentally intact and not losers with neural problems.

I assume anyway that it does not allow your time and even if it would allow you, you do not seem to have the necessary patience to document a little about how harmful this act of masturbation is.

Those who encourage masturbation are either dependent on it, ignorant or unconscious, there are also those who know the danger to which the masturbation practitioner is exposed, the latter encourage this procedure or present it as beneficial, with the criminal intention of creating and amplify the health problems of naive young people.

The benefits of not practicing masturbation are innumerable, but it is easier to throw tendentious words left and right, unknowingly. For those addicted to this practice, look for a partner, get married and then you will have real benefits!

 

[miquelangeles]

+1



You are too young to understand how harmful masturbation is. There are people who are much more physically developed than you who refrain from this practice that is degrading not only physically. From the reports of many I noticed that they are also mentally intact and not losers with neural problems.

I assume anyway that it does not allow your time and even if it would allow you, you do not seem to have the necessary patience to document a little about how harmful this act of masturbation is.

Those who encourage masturbation are either dependent on it, ignorant or unconscious, there are also those who know the danger to which the masturbation practitioner is exposed, the latter encourage this procedure or present it as beneficial, with the criminal intention of creating and amplify the health problems of naive young people.

The benefits of not practicing masturbation are innumerable, but it is easier to throw tendentious words left and right, unknowingly. For those addicted to this practice, look for a partner, get married and then you will have real benefits!

+10

 

[tankasnowgod]

Can't access the study without paying ...

The Abstract says:



So they questioned them, checked vital signs in 1992 and 2010 and according to the reported answers they concluded that fapping X amount of times is healthy? Realy don't know how valid this is, considering how many other factors go into health.

But i am certain taking care of these urges is normal and healthy if not done excesseviely (which many people going nofap struggle with, they are porn addicted and hammer at it multiple times everyday).

Here's the full "Materials and Methods"

In 1992, participants were asked the following question: ‘‘On average, how many ejaculations did you have per month during these ages?: ages 20–29; ages 40–49; past year.’’ The frequency at each time point was reported in the categories none, 1–3, 4–7, 8–12, 13–20, and >20 EPM. To limit the burden for participants and because the question was designed specifically to address the prostate stagnation hypothesis, no information on the specific type of activity leading to ejaculation was requested. Information on potential confounders was ascertained in the 1992 questionnaire and most were updated on the biennial questionnaires throughout follow-up. PSA testing was first assessed in the 1994 questionnaire; starting in 1994, men were also asked if they had an elevated PSA level and whether they had undergone a prostate biopsy or rectal ultrasound.

So, they did a survey in 92, and then asked again every two years. They conclude that ejaculation is beneficial, but it seems just as likely to me that this would be a sign or result of a healthy prostate, not necessarily "protective."

Also, should be noted that internet porn wouldn't have been widely available until the last few years of the study. If a similar study was started in 2005 and run for 18 years, the results might look very different.

 

[miquelangeles]

There is a better study that coomers won't like, which actually differentiated by sexual intercourse, masturbation and age.
It showed increased risk of prostate cancer from masturbation for men in their 20s and 30s.
For over 50 it seemed to have a protective effect, so if you are over 50 maybe it's okay to milk the cow.

The main effects on the risk of prostate cancer (that remain consistent after including potential confounders) are those for overall sexual activity in the 20s, and masturbation in the 20s and 30s, while masturbation and overall sexual activity in the 50s were significant. The overall pattern arising from these results is that frequent sexual activity is positively associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer in younger men, but for men in their 50s there is evidence of an inverse association/protective effect of masturbation and overall sexual activity. Possible reasons for this are presented below. Specifically for men in their 50s the protective effect was apparent even for low sexual activity. Masturbation activity in the 20s and 30s was consistently associated with high risk, but for the 40s there was no significant association with any kind of sexual activity. The protective effect found by Giles et al. [10] applied only to ejaculations experienced in early adult life. In the present results, a slightly protective effect in early adults applied only to moderate overall sexual activity. When we assessed overall sexual activity across the lifetime, there was no significant pattern

Sci-Hub | Sexual activity and prostate cancer risk in men diagnosed at a younger age. BJU International, 103(2), 178–185 | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08030.x