Endotoxin May Be The Real Cause Of "AIDS"

Rafe

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
737
I think Duesberg's argument that HIV could not epidemiologically choose gay men, iv drug users, or African blacks is provocative b/c it suggests cultural and ideological causes of disease interpretation. The way he demonstrates how death from AIDS & ARC are calculated to find these groups representative of the thing we refer to when we say "AIDS" is an important challenge to the conventional view, the way I see it. Not all people who succumb to fungal pneumonia or Kaposi's are calculated as AIDS victims.

There are other threads about Duesberg's dissent and the politics of his views. I do not know whether or not he is correct. But improving metabolism can only help people get and stay well as they can be. Abusing the metabolism clearly makes the body vulnerable to opportunistic disease processes. On this I cannot disagree with him.
 

Travis

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
3,189
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
10,519
Duesberg is right, but the bigger fraud is that any viral condition can become deadly when you give chemicals that increase NO. The highest death rate from flu and herpetic encephalitis in the USA is in the group of older males taking Viagra for ED or nitroglycerin for heart angina. Have you seen the ads about shingles (reactivation of chickenpox virus) on TV? Do you think it is coincidence most of the actors are older males, probably taking some kind of drug with pro-NO effects?

Do you have a study on this?
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
10,519
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe

Peata

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
3,402
I know a couple people who got HIV from blood transfusions back in the day.
 
OP
haidut

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
I know a couple people who got HIV from blood transfusions back in the day.

Did they go on to develop "AIDS" or are they simply carriers of the virus?
 

Peata

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
3,402
Did they go on to develop "AIDS" or are they simply carriers of the virus?
One deteriorated, lost weight, very sick, and when I saw him in the hospital before he died (mid 1990s), he was very swollen up with what I believe they said was, "congestive heart failure". The other person is alive and thriving, on drugs that seem to suppress the virus.
 

Travis

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
3,189
One deteriorated, lost weight, very sick, and when I saw him in the hospital before he died (mid 1990s), he was very swollen up with what I believe they said was, "congestive heart failure". The other person is alive and thriving, on drugs that seem to suppress the virus.

Did the person who died take AZT?
 

Simonsays

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
299
I thought that HIV acquired by men through sex was significantly lower in circumcised men and that the foreskin was the point of entry. There were studies in Nigeria, that HIV rates very low in the Muslim (circumcised) population, compared to the Christian.

Also some African female prostitutes who were routinely having unprotected sex with HIV infected men were not acquiring it as they had developed some kind of antibody??

Just my 2 cents.

This being the Ray Peat forum i await another theory from the "Internet", that it was brought from space by aliens then used and covered up by the CIA in Vietnam War....etc etc
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
10,519
Just about everything written about it is wrong. That much I know. It's one of the worst medical travesties.
 

Area-1255

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2016
Messages
131
HIV/AIDS is a scam by the medical industry, it's a perfect example of indirect manipulation and psychological disturbances in the naive.
 

Travis

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
3,189

tara

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
10,368
Seems quite possible that endotoxin absorption and other anti-metabolic conditions could make one more vulnerable to viral infection and damage, HIV and others.

but couldn't anal sex result in some tissue damage, mechanically speaking? Like micro-tears that would allow bacteria in to the blood stream that shouldn't be there?
Yes damage to tissues. I think that's the maintream explanation for why anal is riskier for transmission of the virus, though vaginal also occurs.

People in the first half of the 20th century (and before) did a lot more unprotected sex and had much lower rates of STD infections.
Do you have evidence for this? That would not have been my intuitive guess.

while male to female transmission is highly unlikely
IIUC, the high rates of infection in some African countries includes a lot of male-> female transmission. I imagine widespread poverty stress and malnutrition contributes to vulnerability.
 

Peata

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2013
Messages
3,402
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom