- Joined
- Feb 11, 2024
- Messages
- 182
Unfortunately, he’s banking on the assumption that the majority of people who follow him either aren’t very intelligent or won’t take the time to read the studies and use logic and decide if what he’s saying actually makes sense. And to a degree it will work, because there are a lot people who follow him who are desperate to heal and hang on his every word and listen to the livestream and say, “oh wow that sounds scary, I definitely won’t look into taking dextrose.” But he’s just stabbing himself in the foot, because people are already starting to see him for who he truly is. By making rash, ignorant livestreams and posts like this where he straight up lies, makes things up, or only tells half the story, for the sake of being spiteful, his credibility goes way down.![]()
Supplementary feeding and jaundice in newborns - PubMed
In a survey it was found that the majority of full-term breast fed infants receive supplementary feeds of water, dextrose solution or infant formula during the first few days of life. Breast fed babies receiving water or dextrose supplements had higher plasma bilirubins on the sixth day of life...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Pretty useless study to judge dextrose.
The study paints physiological hyperbilirubinemia, also called normal newborn jaundice, in a bad light.
60% of all newborns have this type of bilirubinemia and it usually goes away within a couple days independent of any intervention. The liver of the newborn needs a couple days to start working and there's probably some stuff in mother's milk and infant-formulas that stresses the newborn.
There's really no way to judge dextrose by giving a newborn a bit of dextrose and noticing a slight association with increased temporary bilirubinemia. Plain water acted worse than dextrose in this study. So does that mean water is bad?
The simple act of forcing something into a newborn already acts as a massive stressor to every infant that already has to deal with the trauma of being born in a hospital.
Childbirth has a long history of being medicalized by the medical establishment in order to turn women and newborns into patients, often by causing the symptoms they want to treat in the first place.
Not a single study he posted has anything to do with the topic.
Many other claims are plain wrong. Glucose does not turn into aldehydes. Glucose is not turned into fructose in the body in large amounts.
Fructose is metabolized in the liver. 50% of fructose is converted into glucose. 25% is converted to lactate, and around 20% is converted to glycogen. Glucose is only turned into fructose locally when needed: Sugar Swap: Human Brain Converts Glucose into Fructose. It seems the brain needs small amounts of fructose for optimal functioning.
He doesn't appear to read anything he posts. The paper on glucose as an antioxidant is very interesting and clearly says that glucose has both pro- and anti-oxidant abilities, and thus can't be compared to those antioxidants that indeed suppress oxidative metabolism and are flooding the market. Glucose modulates redox homeostasis on both ends.
Glucose is also not a laxative. Sucrose can be an osmotic laxative because some is not broken down quickly, but dextrose is quickly absorbed and does not attract water into the gut.
Ascorbic acid is structurally similar to glucose because in the body it's made from glucose. All animals produce large amounts of ascorbic acid from glucose to serve as a protective substance in times of stress. Humans have the ability to conserve most of their ascorbic acid so that this energetically expensive step is not necessary and dietary ascorbic acid is sufficient.
The study is about two diabetic asthmatics who also take other drugs and react to highly concentrated injections of dextrose. This is basically a reaction to a very high local concentration of dextrose in the blood. As a consequence, the study authors recommend lowering dextrose solution from 50% to 25% to prevent mast cell release. It has nothing to do with the general population.
View attachment 62745
View attachment 62744