- Joined
- Mar 12, 2024
- Messages
- 166
Hi all, I've been thinking about the role of aspirin in achieving a low-toxin body. Dr. Garrett Smith opposes aspirin, arguing that it takes toxins from the bloodstream and deposits them in the liver. However, isn't that what we want? Isn't it the toxins in the bloodstream that cause problems in the first place? Wouldn't it be better to have these toxins stored in the liver, where they can be excreted via bile and absorbed by soluble fiber or activated charcoal?
People feel significantly better after taking high doses of aspirin, and I can attest to this from my own experiments. I always felt much better after taking high doses of aspirin. Yes, the toxins were being stored in my liver, potentially causing fatty liver. However, had I avoided vitamin A and increased my intake of soluble fiber, which I wasn't taking at all, I could have achieved the positive effects of aspirin while managing the negatives safely.
The same could potentially be said for other substances that soak up toxins and store them in the liver, like vitamin E.
People feel significantly better after taking high doses of aspirin, and I can attest to this from my own experiments. I always felt much better after taking high doses of aspirin. Yes, the toxins were being stored in my liver, potentially causing fatty liver. However, had I avoided vitamin A and increased my intake of soluble fiber, which I wasn't taking at all, I could have achieved the positive effects of aspirin while managing the negatives safely.
The same could potentially be said for other substances that soak up toxins and store them in the liver, like vitamin E.