Trump Elected Again?

CiggyTardust

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2021
Messages
250
Location
Southeast US
Correct. Brandon means Joe Biden.

It was born from when a reporter mistakenly thinking the crowd was chanting “let’s go Brandon”; but the crowd was chanting “fvck Joe Biden”.
I don't think it was a mistake... it was intentional deception on the part of the professional liar.
 

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
I don't think it was a mistake... it was intentional deception on the part of the professional liar.
She thought on her toes quickly- im surprised she would be bright enough to think on the spot like that.

Not intentionally trying to sound mean. I am basing it off of the younger TV reporters I have met.
Vapid.
 
OP
L

LeeLemonoil

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
4,265
Correct. Brandon means Joe Biden.

It was born from when a reporter mistakenly thinking the crowd was chanting “let’s go Brandon”; but the crowd was chanting “fvck Joe Biden”.
Thanks.
At least Biden has to endure and take on responsibility for the economic sequeale and consequences of covid, including inflation. No matter if he is really to blame for anything - he will likely end up the most unpopular President ever for the US. Maybe was all along.
 

nomoreketones

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2016
Messages
1,238
Thanks.
At least Biden has to endure and take on responsibility for the economic sequeale and consequences of covid, including inflation. No matter if he is really to blame for anything - he will likely end up the most unpopular President ever for the US. Maybe was all along.
Trying to force through a private sector mandate for an experimental nucleic acid therapy on the entire nation shows that Biden is the most authoritarian and evil president in United States history.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
I don't think it was a mistake... it was intentional deception on the part of the professional liar.
I saw that video, if anything, she was trying to avoid one of the very fineable "7 Dirty Words" going out over the network, or doing her best to distract from it.

No doubt she was much more concerned with FCC regulations than anything else.
 

CiggyTardust

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2021
Messages
250
Location
Southeast US
Trying to force through a private sector mandate for an experimental nucleic acid therapy on the entire nation shows that Biden is the most authoritarian and evil president in United States history.
While I may agree, he's really just a senile puppet. Effort needs to be expended to uncover who his handlers are... the people writing his scripts. What DNC officials are behind this? I suspect people like Podesta, the Obama camp et al are the ones actually in power. They of course are all compromised and controlled by corporate interests and international finance. The layers of corruption go deep. Biden is just a hapless old corrupt fool.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
Thanks.
At least Biden has to endure and take on responsibility for the economic sequeale and consequences of covid, including inflation. No matter if he is really to blame for anything - he will likely end up the most unpopular President ever for the US. Maybe was all along.
In one sense, the current President really shouldn't take all (or even most of) the blame for these issues, they have literally been building for over a century at this point (starting with the Federal Reserve Act, if not earlier). When the "Financial Crisis" hit in 2008, none of those issues were ever solved. They were just kicked down the road.

Having said that, it's clear some of Biden's actions (or attempted actions) have made put even more restrictions on the true economy (real world movement of real things), with his attempts at a Vax mandate, and shutting down the keystone pipeline.

And in a grander picture, he should take a lot of blame. He himself said he was in the Senate 180 years. Obvious dementia aside, he was in the Federal Government for much of the past half a century, with about 40 years in the Senate, and 8 years as VP. Plus, Biden's treatment of Clarence Thomas during his Supreme Court nomination was disgraceful. If that doesn't prove Biden is racist, seriously nothing does (Thomas, meanwhile, has quietly been one of the best Supreme Court Justices in history). He IS full on swamp. So, since whoever sat in that office was going to get serious blame, it's somewhat fitting that an Establishment Swamp Monster just so happened to be in there at this time.
 

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
Biden knows that if he ever went against those pulling the strings he would be destroyed So he has no choice but to obey.
Be destroyed and or not allowed to have young children for sex acts on Pleasure Island.
 
K

Kayaker

Guest
Be destroyed and or not allowed to have young children for sex acts on Pleasure Island.
I've seen no proof of pedophilia among the higher Cabal. It's probably a rumor propagated by them to discredit conspiracy theorists.
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
I've seen no proof of pedophilia among the higher Cabal.
Of course you haven't. You don't even know who the "higher Cabal" is. They don't have their names in public.

There are plenty of credible accusations against people who held offices in the Federal Government, however. If you take the time to research them.
It's probably a rumor propagated by them to discredit conspiracy theorists.
I doubt it. It's not a single rumor. There are many accusations against many rich, famous, and powerful people. Not every one is true, but not every one is false, either. You really would have to judge each case/accusation on it's own merits.

"The Franklin Coverup," by Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp was only involved in one libel suit, a suit DeCamp won for $1 Million.

Cathy O'Brien names several powerful people (and includes graphic detail) as abusers in "Trance-Formation of America." It was published in 1995, and sent to every member of congress at the time. If it isn't true, why didn't people like George HW Bush and Robert Byrd sue her for libel? They had the resources, and the time, and know the law very well.

When Michael Jackson was accused of such things (in what were obvious extortion attempts), he also sued the people that falsely accused him, or wrote about him. He got a Million dollar judgement against a former maid, and also against Victor Gutierrez, for example.

Jackson did everything possible to fight for the integrity of his name. The people Cathy O'Brien named did nothing.
 
Last edited:
K

Kayaker

Guest
Of course you haven't. You don't even know who the "higher Cabal" is. They don't have their names in public.
You mean Rothschild, Rockefeller, and Kissinger aren't the higher Cabal? What makes you think there are people even more powerful not recorded in birth registries, and from whose families would they be if not from those?
There are plenty of credible accusations against people who held offices in the Federal Government, however. If you take the time to research them.

I doubt it. It's not a single rumor. There are many accusations against many rich, famous, and powerful people. Not everyone is true, but not everyone is false, either. You really would have to judge each case/accusation on it's own merits.
I remember this incident from a few years ago. It suggests that she found something damning. But Clinton, and other people who held offices in the Federal Government, aren't the ones actually running the pedophile rings.

"The Franklin Coverup," by Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp was only involved in one libel suit, a suit DeCamp won for $1 Million.

Cathy O'Brien names several powerful people (and includes graphic detail) as abusers in "Trance-Formation of America." It was published in 1995, and sent to every member of congress at the time. If it isn't true, why didn't people like George HW Bush and Robert Byrd sue her for libel? They had the resources, and the time, and know the law very well.
I read a description of one or both of them. The first one, I think was a random isolated incident in Nebraska and has nothing to do with Q's accusations that the international controllers are pedophiles.
When Michael Jackson was accused of such things (in what were obvious extorsion attempts), he also sued the people that falsely accused him, or wrote about him. He got a Million dollar judgement against a former maid, and also against Victor Gutierrez, for example.

Jackson did everything possible to fight for the integrity of his name. The people Cathy O'Brien named did nothing.
Why did Micheal Jackson pay the accusers?
 

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
You mean Rothschild, Rockefeller, and Kissinger aren't the higher Cabal? What makes you think there are people even more powerful not recorded in birth registries, and from whose families would they be if not from those?
I do think there are people above them.

Why would they be recorded in birth registries? It's in no way mandatory (recording a birth in a Bible is fine, for example), and they only reason you have to be "registered" in this way is to be subjugated to the state. I would certainly think the people who made the system know how it operates.
I read a description of one or both of them. The first one, I think was a random isolated incident in Nebraska and has nothing to do with Q's accusations that the international controllers are pedophiles.
I didn't say anything about "Q." You clearly didn't read the book, or watch the follow up documentary, "Conspiracy of Silence." It centered around Larry King (not the CNN guy), and he was pimping underage boys and girls around the country. It was connected to the Washington Examiner headline about call boys taking a tour of the White House.
Why did Micheal Jackson pay the accusers?
He didn't. Jackson didn't pay one cent out of his pocket to ANY accuser. There was an insurance company settlement with the original accuser, but that was the insurance company's decision, and they did it under protest from both Jackson and his lawyer's at the time, because they thought it would make him look guilty. Clearly, it still does in your eyes, since you think he settled. This has been discussed by Tom Mesereau (his attorney in the 2005 trial), and Private Investigator Scott Ross.
 
K

Kayaker

Guest
I do think there are people above them.

Why would they be recorded in birth registries? It's in no way mandatory (recording a birth in a Bible is fine, for example), and they only reason you have to be "registered" in this way is to be subjugated to the state. I would certainly think the people who made the system know how it operates.
If we don't even know if they exist, clearly there's no proof they are involved in pedophilia. Again, it's an empty accusation that makes people look like conspiracy nuts. I bring up Q because this is a thread about Trump.
I didn't say anything about "Q." You clearly didn't read the book, or watch the follow up documentary, "Conspiracy of Silence." It centered around Larry King (not the CNN guy), and he was pimping underage boys and girls around the country. It was connected to the Washington Examiner headline about call boys taking a tour of the White House.
I didn't read the books or watch the documentary, but since it's worth mentioning, I will.
He didn't. Jackson didn't pay one cent out of his pocket to ANY accuser. There was an insurance company settlement with the original accuser, but that was the insurance company's decision, and they did it under protest from both Jackson and his lawyer's at the time, because they thought it would make him look guilty. Clearly, it still does in your eyes, since you think he settled. This has been discussed by Tom Mesereau (his attorney in the 2005 trial), and Private Investigator Scott Ross.
I heard that Jackson paid them, so I believed it was due to him caving in, rather than being guilty. I'm not familiar with the case, but I now respect him more because he didn't give in to false accusations.
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
I've seen no proof of pedophilia among the higher Cabal. It's probably a rumor propagated by them to discredit conspiracy theorists.

What about Prince Andrew and the ongoing criminal investigations against him for pedophilia? You think he was Epstein's only client? I think @Drareg can shed some more light on to who else from the Royals may be involved in this.

Since you said Epstein doesn't count what about Dutroux's case below?

Just a quick look at the case and the massive cover-up and assassination of 20+ witnesses and other people in the know, should show you this was not the local village's pervert.

His own extremely detailed testimony implicated virtually all of Europe's political, business, and "nobility" elite at the time. The movies "Hostel" and "Hostel II" are based on both his testimony and independent investigations by several journalists into the horrific stuff he was involved with. It was not a coincidence that the victims in both movies were very young, maybe even teens. The original movie scripts were with children but the director thought that using children for the torture/murder scenes will revolt the public and may even spur violence, so he went teens and college students instead.
Anyways, there are plenty of examples if you dig around.

Most of those sickos are not even hiding their deeds much these days. Considering the push to normalize pedophilia in order to "combat discrimination", I suspect we will hear about many more such rings/conspiracies/etc soon.

@tankasnowgod @CiggyTardust
 
K

Kayaker

Guest
Since you said Epstein doesn't count what about Dutroux's case below?

Just a quick look at the case and the massive cover-up and assassination of 20+ witnesses and other people in the know, should show you this was not the local village's pervert.

His own extremely detailed testimony implicated virtually all of Europe's political, business, and "nobility" elite at the time. The movies "Hostel" and "Hostel II" are based on both his testimony and independent investigations by several journalists into the horrific stuff he was involved with. It was not a coincidence that the victims in both movies were very young, maybe even teens. The original movie scripts were with children but the director thought that using children for the torture/murder scenes will revolt the public and may even spur violence, so he went teens and college students instead.

Anyways, there are plenty of examples if you dig around.
Where is this extremely detailed testimony? The wiki page only has a paragraph about it, and the sources for it aren't very detailed. Unless it's the one source in another language.

All of it is damning. Police corruption, legal corruption, the liquidations, the unexplained wealth, the letter from a Satanic sect, his own testimony.
Most of those sickos are not even hiding their deeds much these days. Considering the push to normalize pedophilia in order to "combat discrimination", I suspect we will hear about many more such rings/conspiracies/etc soon.
This all has nothing to do with pedophilia, and everything to do with blackmail. They favor putting pedophiles in power because they can control them. If pedophilia became socially acceptable, it would actually work against the elite.
 

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
What about Prince Andrew and the ongoing criminal investigations against him for pedophilia? You think he was Epstein's only client? I think @Drareg can shed some more light on to who else from the Royals may be involved in this.

Since you said Epstein doesn't count what about Dutroux's case below?

Just a quick look at the case and the massive cover-up and assassination of 20+ witnesses and other people in the know, should show you this was not the local village's pervert.

His own extremely detailed testimony implicated virtually all of Europe's political, business, and "nobility" elite at the time. The movies "Hostel" and "Hostel II" are based on both his testimony and independent investigations by several journalists into the horrific stuff he was involved with. It was not a coincidence that the victims in both movies were very young, maybe even teens. The original movie scripts were with children but the director thought that using children for the torture/murder scenes will revolt the public and may even spur violence, so he went teens and college students instead.
Anyways, there are plenty of examples if you dig around.

Most of those sickos are not even hiding their deeds much these days. Considering the push to normalize pedophilia in order to "combat discrimination", I suspect we will hear about many more such rings/conspiracies/etc soon.

@tankasnowgod @CiggyTardust

Lord Mountbatten is a relative of the royals and was also linked into the paedophile ring centered around the kincora boys home in Northern Ireland.

Also this dossier, it was clearly a cover up -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossier

Did you see the CIA had agents caught with child porn, little to nothing about it in MSM, no government investigation, the CNN producer also, he was Chris Cuomo’s producer, it’s a cesspool of depravity, you can’t keep up with it.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom