Rafael Lao Wai
Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2017
- Messages
- 1,790
Exactly what I thought too.How is harm verified? EPA says glyphosates are safe. CDC says vaccines are harmless. Aha says PUFAs are essential. These are verified?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Exactly what I thought too.How is harm verified? EPA says glyphosates are safe. CDC says vaccines are harmless. Aha says PUFAs are essential. These are verified?
It's biology, but none of those three exist in a vacuum; they're all interdependent. How would socioeconomic class affect your thought patterns without passing through the medium of the nervous system? That's absurd.why do women tend to be more left-leaning in their beliefs, while men tend to be more conservative? Maybe it's biology affecting thoughts, maybe it's class status, or maybe it's environment.
How is harm verified? EPA says glyphosates are safe. CDC says vaccines are harmless. Aha says PUFAs are essential. These are verified?
You can say the same about people who are "genuinely hypersensitive" to glyphosates, vaccines, and PUFA?Well where is the wifi harm? It’s everywhere, all the time, with multiple sources. With the exception of a few hypochondriac snowflakes and the extremely few genuinely hypersensitive individuals, there doesn’t appear to be any harm.
At this point in time, it doesn’t matter what anyone says about wifi, you can see for yourself.
That sounds like an argument that corporations would use to avoid responsibility. Just because something is "everywhere, all the time, with multiple sources", it doesn't mean it's safe. In my state there is violence and crimes pretty much everywhere, all the time, from multiple people, so that, in your view, means it isn't bad anymore? They literally set 2 buses on fire not very far from where I live, and I was close enough to the area to hear na exchange of fire between the criminals and the police. Same thing for PUFA: it's everywhere and everyone eats it, but you have to be more than generous to ignore the awful state of health of even teenagers nowadays. Just look at pictures from people from even just 100 years ago and compare that to people of the same age from today. Or maybe one is a "snowflake hypochondriac" just because they want a healthy life.Well where is the wifi harm? It’s everywhere, all the time, with multiple sources. With the exception of a few hypochondriac snowflakes and the extremely few genuinely hypersensitive individuals, there doesn’t appear to be any harm.
At this point in time, it doesn’t matter what anyone says about wifi, you can see for yourself.
You can say the same about people who are "genuinely hypersensitive" to glyphosates, vaccines, and PUFA?
That sounds like an argument that corporations would use to avoid responsibility. Just because something is "everywhere, all the time, with multiple sources", it doesn't mean it's safe. In my state there is violence and crimes pretty much everywhere, all the time, from multiple people, so that, in your view, means it isn't bad anymore? They literally set 2 buses on fire not very far from where I live, and I was close enough to the area to hear na exchange of fire between the criminals and the police. Same thing for PUFA: it's everywhere and everyone eats it, but you have to be more than generous to ignore the awful state of health of even teenagers nowadays. Just look at pictures from people from even just 100 years ago and compare that to people of the same age from today. Or maybe one is a "snowflake hypochondriac" just because they want a healthy life.
If you're not affected( or doesn't realize that you are), then fine, I'm glad you aren't, but no need to be dismissive of other people's experiences.
Is an anecdotal evidence enough? I was having nocturia and when I went to sleep in a room that can't be reached by wifi and by dect cordless phone signals, I started to sleep well and not have to wake up at night to pee as much, only waking up once as compared to 3-4x before.There is a fair amount of studies supporting the negative effects of PUFA. Show me a study showing the same for wifi - aside from the few that involve practically microwaving rats.
Is an anecdotal evidence enough? I was having nocturia and when I went to sleep in a room that can't be reached by wifi and by dect cordless phone signals, I started to sleep well and not have to wake up at night to pee as much, only waking up once as compared to 3-4x before.
Why don't you turn off your wifi and turn off the dect phone for 1 week and find out if you can feel any better from it?
Yeah, I'm not happy about it either, and good on you for those measures, especially with your kid, since they will likely become normal to him and not feel like he has to worry about this or that. I think those simple measures can go a long way, since, just like PUFA, the damage isn't done in one day or two or even 100 days. It's the years and years of consistent exposure that eventually causes a disease that is hard to trace back due to the lack of a strong accute reaction.Look man, I’m not happy about radiation. I only use my phone on loudspeaker, I bought a my kid a cushioned stand for his tablet to increase the distance from his body. I also have a wifi timer, as pointless as it is, given other networks around me. But these are precautions, to be on the safe side, and they are as much as I’m willing to do in this regards, as I think that stressing any more over it would likely be more detrimental to my health and shorten my life more than going with the flow and accept the exposure as it is.
Because aside from moving into the wilderness, there is absolutely NOTHING one can do about it. You won’t stop your neighbors’ wifi, you won’t stop the 5G expansion, but fighting it and letting it frustrate you and let the feelings of rage, fear or injustice eat you from inside, is guaranteed to hurt you, whereas the 5G the harm is only a possibility.
Yeah, sorry man, I don’t want to take your experience from you, but that is ridiculously not enough.
I have plenty of anecdotal experience. From falling asleep in my car a lot -- (using bluetooth/your phone in you car gives you serious RF radiation, hitting the brakes blasts your brain with about 200x the recommended electrical field exposure to name a couple...), major brain fog when my router and smart-thermostat was still on (massive RF radiation), having less fragmented sleep turning off my phone and router at night, I have more than enough experience to prove it to myself. I have no need for studies, but that said, I can respect the desire to find some. Actually, there has been research done. I recommend looking into Nicolas Pineault, he is what I consider the pioneer into EMF and all the problems that come from it. He is very well read, and yet very down to earth and easy to understand. Reading his book really opened my eyes. "The Non Tinfoil Hat Guide to EMF". He explains the science, does indeed go over many scientific studies, explains why its an issue, and then goes over many anecdotal accounts as well as scientific studies, and then ways you can mitigate it. A short but interesting book.
Lol would you mind giving the cliffs? I have too many books on my reading list rn
1G and 2G technologies were massively more energy emitting than 3 or 4G
- FCC probably knows that EMF are harmful, and they don't care. Serious studies haven't been done by the FCC since the 90s when 3g, 4g all that didn't exist yet and safety EMF standards are still based upon the studies done in the 90s and have no relevance in a 4g, 5g world.
- Most countries other than the united states recognize EMF are harmful, especially some countries like Israel which is one of the few countries to have very strict EMF limits.
- Even cell phone manufacturers know that you shouldn't hold a phone directly against your head and it is even shown in the fine print (which nobody reads anymore) probably so no one can sue them when they get brain cancer.
- Popular opinion is that ionizing radiation is the only radiation that is harmful. This is false. Non-ionizing radiation, while it may not heat as much as ionizing radiation, comes with its own problems. Heat was the only factor considered in the 90s though. There was little to no study into the main issues that non-ionizing radiation poses, which is signals. Wifi, 4g sends out signals to phones, but the problem is these signals also get interpreted by our bodies because our bodies also run off low level electricity. However, they are unnatural signals and confuse our body, and cause havoc like leaky gut, leaky blood brain barrier, disruption of voltage gate calcium channel, just to name a couple. EMF also triggers inflammation in the body, which triggers the whole stress pathway that RP speaks of constantly (serotonin, tryptophan, estrogen, cortisol, adrenaline) and studies have shown increased white blood cell count (triggering of immune system) and destruction of red blood cells (apoptosis). strong electrical fields are so potent they can actually do things like light a light bulb. You can see this for yourself (Well, I'm not gonna be attempting this though lol) by holding a light bulb up 50-100 ft from high voltage power lines (500,000V) and it will literally light up.
- Plenty of studies have been done showing the harmful effects on humans living near cell towers ranging from lower end problems like depression, fatigue, irritability, confusion to higher end problems like cancer. Studies have shown there is a clear relationship to people living near to cell towers and higher occurrence of depression, fatigue, irritability etc. This effect is seen as far away as 400-500 meters from cell towers. Within 50 feet of cell towers, occurrence of symptoms is nearly 100% (Occurrence of fatigue was something like 80%+).
- Mitigation strategies involve using speakerphone with your phone (never put it against your face), using 3G instead of 4G, using airplane mode or turning it off entirely especially when sleeping or when you must put it in your pocket. Turn off your wireless on router when going to bed, and even during the day (if you can use ethernet instead), make sure you sleeping environment is low in magnetic and electric fields (turn off breaker in your bedroom for added protection). Or at least make sure electrical appliances are far from your bed. Find the place in your home that is lowest EMF and use that as your bedroom.
- Ideal #... at least for sleeping, forget the # off hand but I know I aim for 0.1mG or less magnetic, 0.0 EF (quite achievable when you turn off breaker and/or move all electrical appliance), and 0.001 mW/m^2 RF (This is the most difficult one, but achievable if you go somewhere shielded like the basement for me. Yes I sleep in my basement... Just not my mom's basement =P)
I have also heard he plagiarized other people's work, and when he was confronted about it, he claimed they were being anti-semitic.Einstein was deeply embedded in a highly political cabal way before he arrived in America. There are a lot of criticisms that his achievements in physics are overblown because this same cabal promoted him for their cause.
I normally use a bluetooth headset in the office when making calls but I just realized that's probably as bad as using a cellphone next to the head.
Does a Cisco office phone present the same issues when held close to the head?