IROM
Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2020
- Messages
- 154
Found this article reading old Executive Intelligence Review articles. I study the Larouche organization as a hobby and in no way call myself a true believer of the organization. However, they have unique insight into the Anglo-dominance over American thought and I think too often we blame the APA or CIA for issues that derived from century old traditions of the British establishment; for example, Tavistock institute or COIN tactics derived from British Colonial operations.
Anyway here is an excerpt which I think may elucidate some of the objectives of this pandemic. The goal is not to change our behavior but our personalities as are all the current major crises. Here is the article with some annotations by this author in italics.
Anyway here is an excerpt which I think may elucidate some of the objectives of this pandemic. The goal is not to change our behavior but our personalities as are all the current major crises. Here is the article with some annotations by this author in italics.
Crisis management: Aquarius goes public
The ordinary citizens react with horrified incredulity when presented with this situation. They simply refuse to believe that this conspiracy is at work. This in scientific terms is called hysterical reaction formation. On many occasions, for instance, when in past years I have discussed these matters with generally well informed and influential citizens, the virtually universal reaction was "Lies! I don't believe it. I don't accept conspiracy theories. Where are your facts!"
When in the course of time the facts were produced, and the conspirators themselves took to writing books, magazine articles and research papers to publicly proclaim that they have been for all these years engaging in this far flung, multibillion dollar conspiracy, most of our good interlocutors were still speechless.
The decent majority of citizens of the U.S. must force themselves to get acquainted with the facts of the conspiracy. Because the conspirators depend on producing a paralyzing shock-effect in order to succeed. In part, the reason that they have decided to come out and openly proclaim the conspiracy is to produce such paralyzing shock-effect.
The strategic foundation for the current form of the Aquarian Conspiracy were laid down during the 1966-67 period in a series of high level NATO conferences which at the time involved, among others, a famous NATO official, Aurelio Peccei, the then little known Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski [guy behind Carter, Obama and Biden] in his capacity as a staff member of the State Department's Policy Planning Group and most of the leaders of those multinational corporations we mentioned earlier. The final decisions of those NATO deliberations were to apply a series of long. term policies throughout the Western World for the purpose of inducing a transition to a technologically "steady-state," "zero-growth" "post-industrial society."
The Soviet bloc was supposed to be skillfully induced to gradually evolve toward a similar type of "steady-state" equilibrium system. Dr. Brzezinski, in the aftermath of those NATO meetings wrote his famous essay, the "Technocratic Era" and Aurelio Peccei his famous "Chasm Ahead." Following that, McGeorge Bundy and the Council on Foreign Relations attempted to start the "inducement process" with the Soviets by jointly establishing the Vienna International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis. The SALT and "non-proliferation" processes also got underway. The NASA program was gradually terminated and a massive increase in world drug traffic got underway. Aurelio Peccei went to Tavistock Institute at Sussex England and there he launched, the notorious Club of Rome jointly with Tavistock [For more information look at Trilateral Commission document "Crisis in Democracy" and the relationship of Gianni Agnelli with Alexei Kosygin regarding foundation of the Club of Rome.] The brainwashing specialists of the Tavistock network internationally went to work. The era of government by "crisis management" had arrived. Some basic things ought to be said now about the social-engineering technique of "crisis management."
Kurt Lewin and topoligical psychology
The technique derives from the "topological psychology" doctrine of Dr. Kurt Lewin, the seminal theoretical influence in the entire field of social-psychology, the patron-saint of all the Tavistock-related think-tanks and the man upon whose theories the psychological warfare battles of World War II were fought. To summarize the matter of Lewin's doctrine: all psychological phenomena occur in a domain defined as "psychological phase space" or "life space." This space is composed of two interdependent "fields," the "environment" and the "self." Life space is the domain in which human behavior occurs and that behavior depends on both environment and "self' or B=f(E.P) (meaning Behavior is a function of Environment and Person.) This is accompanied by a tremendous amount of misplaced emphasis on mathematical/topological interpretations of psychological relations none of which makes any contribution to scientific knowledge but which is admirably suited for transforming psychological problems into computer-programmable problems, which was promptly done.
The concept of "controlled environment" arose from the common-sensical observation that if you have a fixed personality (one susceptible to being predictably profiled) and if you want to elicit from this personality a particular type of behavior, then all you have to do is control the third variable of the equation and thus produce the desired behavior. This was the standard social-psychology formula used for years in every type of situation from labor negotiations to army counterinsurgency operations, to major diplomatic maneuvers, until apparently some time in the 1960s. From that point on the greater emphasis of social-psychology practice and theory was placed on the problem of using the technique of "controlled environment" to produce not the desired B (behavior) but the desired P (personality) in the equation.
It can be speculated that our brainwashers found it very frustrating to merely modify the behavior of the victim case-by-case and they started puzzling over doing something drastic and permanent like altering the deeper structures of human personalities. Thus, brainwashing moved from the era of "behavior modification" to the era of "identy change." The theory for this type of activity again relied upon the original formulations of two Tavistock theoreticians, Dr. William Sargeant's theory in his Battle for the Mind, and Kurt Lewins's own work on personality regression.
Again in summary, Lewin observed that the inner self of individuals displays certain reactions when under tension from the environment. When there is no tension, then the normal "inner self' of a person is well differentiated, balanced, multifaceted, versatile. When a reasonable amount of tension is applied from the environment, then all the various abilities and faculties of the inner self go on alert, ready for effective action. When a intolerable amount of tension is applied, then this geometry collapses into a blinded, undifferentiated "schwarmerei," a primitivization, a regression of the personality occurs. The person is reduced to an animal, the highly differentiated' and versatile abilities disappear. The controlled environment takes over the personality.
From this bit of nastiness emerged the theory of government by "crisis management [see Trilateral Commission document "Crisis in Democracy]." The social psychologists reasoned, more or less, in the following fashion: "since we are already in control of a 'controlled environment,' what will happen to the P (person) entrapped inside it when we introduce 'social environmental turbulence'?"
The deliberately directed "turbulence" will create tensions for the P (person) and under those conditions we shall examine the effects of directed tension upon the personality and character structure of large populations.
A senior psychiatrist of the Tavistock clinic, Dr. Fred Emery, now at the National University of Australia and formerly a member of President Johnson's Kerner Commission, describes the following symptoms that large populations display under conditions of this sort of "social environmental turbulence" i.e. the social crises that "crisis management" causes:
There will be three phases of reaction to social crisis. The first is "Superficiality" in which the threatened population will react by adopting some shallow sloganeering ideals to which, however, it shall not attach any serious "ego investment." This is a passive "maladaptive" response. Maladaptive because it fails to identify the causes of the crisis and therefore the crisis (tension) will persist. [At the beginning much mask wearing, jokes and memes. Dancing nurses and the lot. All was superficial with the idea that we were all just normal people and crisis would be over. No one was ostracized so much at this point.]
The second phase of reaction, since the crisis continues, will be "fragmentation" in which panic begins to strike, social cohesion breaks down and small social groups try to protect themselves from the crisis at the expense of other small and fragmented social groups. [We are dealing with the establishment's solution to this now. You must learn how to rid your personality of even hesitancy or doing your own research which are not simply behaviors but aspects of underlying personality. Thrice vaccinated lauded over twice vaccinated. Hierarchy emerges. Vaccination behavior associated with underlying personality]
This is also a "passive maladaptive" reaction and, failing to identify the causes of the crisis, it degenerates further into a third phase: "disassociation" the victim turns away from the source of tension, from the induced crisis and goes into a fantasy trip of introspection, obsession with self, the so-called "self-realization" process of the Stanford Research Institute's report. [People unable to cope with social pressures will become either nutty cultists of the Q anon variety or completely disregard any evidence of concern with vaccines despite there being no reason to disregard. They may have Damascus road conversion to become champions of "science"]
Subsequently, Dr. Emery's Tavistock report adds that these three "passive" maladaptive responses are each accompanied by an "active" but equally maladaptive response. Superficiality is thus paired with "synoptic idealism" as its opposite; "fragmentation" with "authoritarianism"; disassociation with "evangelicism."
The report then goes on to summarize the results of the last thirty years of combined applied social psychology and "crisis management:" In the decade of the 1960s we had the "superficiality" of the New Left movement paired with the "synoptic idealism" of the Great Society. In the decade of the 1970s we had the "fragmentation" of "community control " movements paired with the "authoritarianism" of the Nixon era. In the decade of the 1980s we have the "disassociation" of "self-realization," "transcendental meditation," drugs etc, paired with the "evangelicism of all forms of mass religious fundamentalism.
So all these scenarios are in the computers of our pervasive social engineering think tanks. The scenarios are in operation at the present time. What is supposed to emerge out of the pair of "disassociation" and "evangelicism" of the present national crisis is the "Age of Aquarius." The snag in the whole project is that the brainwashers of our society are counting exclusively on the population responding with only "maladaptive" responses, i.e., responses to the crisis which fail to identify the causes of the crisis or "environmental turbulence." Should the population, or even significant minorities of the population, be able to identify what the causes of the crisis are, the whole social engineering operation of the last thirty years will collapse.
