If you allow yourself to think beyond the boundaries of your confirmation bias, you may begin to form a more "big picture" understanding of the medical-political complexes that systemically drive the narrative you (and the people around you) believe to be true.
The biases I am aware of operating on wrt vaccines are around pretty straight-forward evidence and reason.
As far as I can tell, my conclusions don't go too far beyond the evidence, and the reasoning is sound.
That doesn't justify some of the much stronger positions others seems to have attributed to me; I don't accept responsibility for other people's exaggerations.
I am still unclear on the specific rationale for why you are inclined to believe in ...
I don't recall saying that, but if I did, can you quote it? If I've been unclear, I might want to clarify.
I generally don't get my news from MSM (but I didn't think they had the power to prevent news or for that matter misinformation from being published in other sources).
AIUI, having access to the blueprints is not sufficient to be able to reproduce these new vaccines reliably. There is some skill and expertise involved.... especially given that at the earliest phase of vaccine development the pharmaceutical companies publicly stated they would make the vaccine "blueprints" publicly accessible and usable for the greater good.
I don't see evidence of this generally, though clearly the lockdowns have clearly been very hard for some people.(it is paradoxically smaller than the number of lives lost due to pandemic management collateral damage; short-medium-long term, i.e. lockdowns, isolation, delayed cancer screening and other critical non-covid surgeries, etc.)
In some places, there have been other benefits from anti-covid measures, such as reduced harm and deaths from 'flu's, traffic, air pollution, etc,