BearWithMe
Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2017
- Messages
- 2,024
Are military personnel getting the same shots as civilians?How will world leaders, politicians, and bureaucrats benefit when military personnel become too sick to work?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click Here if you want to upgrade your account
If you were able to post but cannot do so now, send an email to admin at raypeatforum dot com and include your username and we will fix that right up for you.
Are military personnel getting the same shots as civilians?How will world leaders, politicians, and bureaucrats benefit when military personnel become too sick to work?
Well stated animalcute. Rather than some vast conspiracy amongst a global group with a singular agenda, vaccine orthodoxy is the logical result of typical human conformism and a system that commoditizes everything.
What would happen if there would be a lot of disabled people and not enough healthy people to take care of them?How will anyone benefit from a population of mostly disabled people? Sure, some will die but I think the large majority will just become fully or partially disabled.
Are military personnel getting the same shots as civilians?
It is not even a question at this pointThat is a great question, Bear.
Gates is definitely a man with too much power and too much money and some nefarious seeming plans. But I always wonder: why? Does he genuinely believe that he’s doing this for the benefit of mankind? Or is it for the benefit of the environment/the world? What is driving him?Let's also mention the guy who is invested in all these vaccine companies. Now he is planning to blow particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into the space, reduce sunlight hitting the earth and therefore our skin. This will lead to a global Vitamin D deficiency and therefore weak immune systems world wide. More sick people. More vaccine sales.
That's not even the worst. By changing the natural ecosystem, plants and life on earth will die. Probably that might be a reason why he is now the owner of the most farmland in the world. Control the food chain, control humanity. I bet he has already genetically modified plants ready who will survive his sunlight reduction plans.
You are assuming he is sane.Gates is definitely a man with too much power and too much money and some nefarious seeming plans. But I always wonder: why? Does he genuinely believe that he’s doing this for the benefit of mankind? Or is it for the benefit of the environment/the world? What is driving him?
I guess the profit motive just doesn’t seem to be enough, imo. At some point, a billionaire has got to tire of that game, right?
You are assuming he is sane.
He is not.
They already have plenty of slaves in their Xinjiang concentration camps to meet their needs.
They don't care about society for us.
They think we are causing environmental collapse and all they have to do is get rid of us and expand their 50,000-acre estates to 12 million acres.
Tanzania must be saved as a hunting preserve for Charles. Zuck gets all of Hawaii.
If "they" suddenly showed an interest in decommissioning all existing nuclear sites worldwide immediately, as well as bringing back funding for sites like Yucca Mountain, then it'd seem like a less shortsighted plan.
Unless they have some plan for the Xinjiang slaves to keep the cooling pools holding spent nuclear fuel in sites worldwide from boiling away, there is a real existential risk. Assuming they want an environment to live in that can support higher order life.
It wouldn't take too many Fukushima type events to poison all the atmosphere and oceans for millennia. Which is a very real possibility if any power grids were to fail, and the generators powering the cooling pools couldn't be constantly maintained and provisioned with diesel. Both points are dependent on the current state of global manufacturing, drilling & refining, supply chain & transportation, etc. Which I can guarantee you all have several single points of failure that would be realized if their expertise & manpower suddenly had a 60% reduction.
Right. Never thought I'd see the day when some of the pro-vaccine doctors make an exception to rule. They have kids and families so I suppose they are willing to take the risk in hopes to prevent a global catastrophe that could affect generations to come.Why do you suppose this is happening? I've never seen this kind of talk from mainstream doctors before.
Didn't think of that. I've heard in the past that politicians and some others were getting vaccines without adjuvants, which defeats the purpose I know, but shows it could happen.Are military personnel getting the same shots as civilians?
Insanity coupled with a God-complex.Let's also mention the guy who is invested in all these vaccine companies. Now he is planning to blow particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into the space, reduce sunlight hitting the earth and therefore our skin. This will lead to a global Vitamin D deficiency and therefore weak immune systems world wide. More sick people. More vaccine sales.
That's not even the worst. By changing the natural ecosystem, plants and life on earth will die. Probably that might be a reason why he is now the owner of the most farmland in the world. Control the food chain, control humanity. I bet he has already genetically modified plants ready who will survive his sunlight reduction plans.
They want to force the digital identity on us. Now we talk mainly about the vaccine passport, but once the infrastructure is in place you can add more functionalities to it. Next step: digital central bank money. I think that this is the most dangerous thing we face at the moment. It would give the elites unprecedented control over the populace.Is it purely for power and influence?
Clearly it's dangerous and not helping to slow the thing the they call the pandemic.
At first I figured it was an effort to reduce population growth but with the information available now regarding ADE, spongiform encephalopathy, and autoimmune issues, it could potentially disable a large percentage of the population.
How will anyone benefit from a population of mostly disabled people? Sure, some will die but I think the large majority will just become fully or partially disabled.
If it's part of the technocracy agenda or the great reset; how would they benefit from a bunch of sick and disabled people?
The pharma companies will love it ... they'll have an endless flow of customers but they basically already do. They already dominate all the medical education organizations and insurance companies; how much more power and influence can they even achieve?
How will world leaders, politicians, and bureaucrats benefit when military personnel become too sick to work?
Whoever "they" are; they don't seem to be all on the same page. And I think part of this catastrophe sprung out of some major incompetency (and subsequent denial of) which has since been uncovered but it's too late; the momentum was already there and the ball kept rolling.
And don't most of us know it? Most of the people that I know that have gotten the vaccine are noticeably more stressed; like they know they gave in to the fear of being an outcast and now they have to live with it, in addition to the concern of long term effects.
... Or maybe I'm just picking up on the disturbance to the limbic system that the spike protein can cause?
There's probably no definitive answer.
Guess I'm just wondering what peoples' thoughts are.
Even the nuclear power plants that are shut down will need cooling for several years, and this requires electricity.If "they" suddenly showed an interest in decommissioning all existing nuclear sites worldwide immediately, as well as bringing back funding for sites like Yucca Mountain, then it'd seem like a less shortsighted plan.
Unless they have some plan for the Xinjiang slaves to keep the cooling pools holding spent nuclear fuel in sites worldwide from boiling away, there is a real existential risk. Assuming they want an environment to live in that can support higher order life.
It wouldn't take too many Fukushima type events to poison all the atmosphere and oceans for millennia. Which is a very real possibility if any power grids were to fail, and the generators powering the cooling pools couldn't be constantly maintained and provisioned with diesel. Both points are dependent on the current state of global manufacturing, drilling & refining, supply chain & transportation, etc. Which I can guarantee you all have several single points of failure that would be realized if their expertise & manpower suddenly had a 60% reduction.
You raise an interesting point, dfspcc20. I wonder how well they've thought through their plan.
They seem like the underpants gnomes.
Even the nuclear power plants that are shut down will need cooling for several years, and this requires electricity.
I love your avatar, Nemo!I love the way you cut right to it, Bear.
Yeah... did you see this yet?They want to force the digital identity on us. Now we talk mainly about the vaccine passport, but once the infrastructure is in place you can add more functionalities to it. Next step: digital central bank money. I think that this is the most dangerous thing we face at the moment. It would give the elites unprecedented control over the populace.
In my mind they're more like bumbling fools. I realize the mRNA tech research was well underway before the so called pandemic became reality, but clearly it wasn't at the stage they wanted it to be at when they originally planned to release it. Even so, the opportunity arose so they grabbed it. Somebody, or some collective, made the call to release it early. Either they were forced to make the call under pressure of the 'warp speed' effort, or they were simply playing god. OR... perhaps it's much more diabolical and certain demographics are getting different versions of the vaccines as @BearWithMe pointed out. That directly goes against the Nuremberg Code but we're way past that already.The risk of ADE is the most difficult one to wrap my head around. To force this stuff on entire populations risking that a huge percentage might die and no-one can predict who would be affected makes no sense. Maybe I am wrongly assuming that people with traces of sanity are in power.
Vitrification is the safest long range storage method, but the expense makes them prefer putting it into tanks that corrode fairly quickly. “They” have been increasing their power very quickly, and I think they aren’t bothered by making whole regions unlivable.
The education they get at home and at places like Yale prepares their brain in a way that makes them blind and deaf to everything in reality that doesn’t add to their wealth and power. The industrial economies and cultures have been on a dead end course for 300 years, but the changes that are required are considered by them to be worse than death.
FYI- I emailed Ray about the above concerns of nuclear containment and how they could be so shortsighted. His responses:
His father hated humans and was obsessed with depopulation of the planet, as much as I read about the Gates. As we know, the son is often worse than it's father.Gates is definitely a man with too much power and too much money and some nefarious seeming plans. But I always wonder: why? Does he genuinely believe that he’s doing this for the benefit of mankind? Or is it for the benefit of the environment/the world? What is driving him?
I guess the profit motive just doesn’t seem to be enough, imo. At some point, a billionaire has got to tire of that game, right?