x-ray peat
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 2,343
Wrong. If you cant see the difference between the IPCC consensus and the Cook consensus then I am not sure there is much sense continuing this. Your statement that “I will adjust my position proportionally with a change in expert consensus” sums up the issue perfectly. It's obvious that you have outsourced your thinking to the experts.Some people. Anyway, what's your point? They're categorizing it. If emissions of a broad range of gg contribute to global climate change that is stating that humans contribute to climate change without quantifying it.
I can explain this. When humans clear land, carbon is released from the soil. Therefore it's implied human activity contributes to global warming.
Anyway, as long as they saw it's human AGW and not primary cause, it's fine..
I think Yerrag had it right
It's best at this point to not waste your efforts. I'm afraid your patience may wear thin. Those who worship at the altar of global warming can continue on with their lives.