x-ray peat
Member
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2016
- Messages
- 2,343
I understood the link far better than you I'm afraid. It seems that you have been desperately searching for anything you think supports your view including this latest tripe for elite mind control of the electorate. Again science is not a popularity contest and it is far from apolitical. If you think so then you really should be on a different forum as much of what Ray believes runs counter to the scientific consensus, including his disbelief in AGW. Give a scientist enough money or perqs and they like any other human will say whatever you want. This is what you refuse to recognize.This is basic critical thinking and what I've been echoing in this and the other threads where conspiracy theory thinking is rampant. If you don't have more information than the experts, you're just being arrogant if you think you can glance at the information and form a better hypothesis. It has nothing to do with the nightly news. It has to do with aggregate expert opinions. It is why the stock market and sports betting is difficult to beat and becomes more difficult to beat as the participants, technology and money increases.
I doubt you read the link, or if you did, you didn't absorb it.
You also refuse to deal with the facts, whether on climate change or any of the other issues, but rather continue to claim that anyone who disagrees with you must have flawed reasoning or some other various personal defect. I have news for you, there are far better informed experts on climate science than you and I, that think that man-made global warming is lie. You would be well advised to look into what they have to say and deal with the facts rather than looking for the answer in some random blog post by a third rate amateur philosopher.
Last edited: