From reading this article, I've formulated this line of reasoning:
If you're healthy and you test positive, then what?
If you're healthy and you test false positive, then what?
If you're healthy and you test false negative, then what?
If you're healthy and you don't know you're infected, then what?
Easier to assume you're already infected, and do what's expected from being infected, and you'll be better off in the end. Immune and alive.
Unless you're sick, why test? Give way to those who need the test. And those who need the treatment.
When the crisis is over, only two kinds of people are left - the immune and the dead.
So do your job to stay healthy.
If you're healthy and you test positive, then what?
If you're healthy and you test false positive, then what?
If you're healthy and you test false negative, then what?
If you're healthy and you don't know you're infected, then what?
Easier to assume you're already infected, and do what's expected from being infected, and you'll be better off in the end. Immune and alive.
Unless you're sick, why test? Give way to those who need the test. And those who need the treatment.
When the crisis is over, only two kinds of people are left - the immune and the dead.
So do your job to stay healthy.