The Agenda Being Pushed: the Normalization of Sex with Children

tankasnowgod

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
8,131
FWIW, the rough cut of the unaired documentary "Conspiracy of Silence" is still on the same Youtube channel I watched it on about 4 years ago-


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x-IZS8uKYo


The channel itself isn't monetized, but it's still there. As is this speech from Cathy O'Brien, at an event with Roseanne Barr-


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh7SWnZMPng&t=2460s


I remember hearing this interview with Erik Prince live, just days before the 2016 Presidential election. It is still up on Brietbart, without any corrections or edits since-


All of these survive, even in the environment of the past two years.
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
@haidut I was talking about the professor from Fredonia -- I dont know about the Krugman incident -- i dont doubt youre right on that case (just never looked into it)

Oh, sorry, I guess we were talking about different people. My mistake, no worries.
 

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
The police and FBI are in on it, at least the people at the very top. Remember Paul Krugman - one of the leaders of the new "left" - had child porn found on his computer? Guess what, he simply said "oh, hackers put it there". No investigation, no nothing, even though by law his computer has to be seized and analyzed and he has to be formally deposed/interrogated under oath.

Only the most egregious cases will be prosecuted and even then, most of the trial would be staged in such a way as to produce minimal "news"/noise, most of the really damning evidence is never presented, and eventually the verdict is a nothingburger. @Drareg and I have been following the Maxwell trial and guess what - it basically went away and no MSM outlet is talking about it any more despite the fact that this was supposedly a pedophilia ring spanning the globe, had intel agencies involved (proven beyond doubt), and had the potential star defendant/witness promptly "suicided" under laughably obvious non-suicide circumstances. Quietly, without almost any coverage in MSM, even the cases against the guards that were supposed to watch Epstein but left their posts were recently dropped. No explanation why, no outrage by the media about this obvious coverup. As far as MSM and the elite is concerned, the entire thing is all but forgotten.

I still have some hopes for the Prince Andrew case, but I suspect he may suffer an unfortunate accident or heart attack before his case goes to trial. He definitely knows at least as much as Epstein about the whole thing and can actually bring the entire British monarchy down if he talks too much. So, he is basically waiting for his Diana "accident", IMO. Speaking of her, my personal suspicion is that Diana knew members of the royal family were hardcore pedos (and probably tortured kids to death too, like that Belgian sicko Dutroux testified), and threatened them with exposure if they don't leave her alone. But poor Diana did not know that once you join the Royal Family, they won't let you go...alive, that is.
I remember you said on the podcast the company you worked found child porn on intelligence agencies computers, it was reported and the intelligence agency did nothing, a few weeks ago it was found that CIA agents were involved with paedophilia while working within the CIA, it kind of got buried in the news, again nothing matters unless its amplified incessantly.
This covid saga has been a prime example of how amplification works, it ties in really well with what Peat speaks about relative to Claude Shannons information theory and Norbert Weiners cybernetics control and feedback in the animal and machine.

Peat uses the analogies to represent us and how we work as an organism, in reality then its a de facto spell cast on people, they are not educated well enough to comprehend it so we get the crazy incoherent behaviour we see globally now. The amplification signals potential resources, attractive to organisms.
 

Demyze

Member
Joined
May 21, 2015
Messages
460
I wonder who else knows what the royals have been up to;
924x615.jpg

Kevin Spacey Flew On Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Lolita Express’ With Bill Clinton

downloadfile-2.jpg
 
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
Nothing to see here....
0FCF3BD6-7277-471D-936A-76294897CB97.png
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
Nothing to see here....View attachment 33492

Here is another one. That creature would be a perfect face for an ad playing on the anti-drug campaign of the 80s - "Endocrine Disruptors? NOT. EVEN. ONCE." Feel free to substitute "endocrine disruptors" with "SSRI", "PUFA", "conversion therapy", etc and it would be just as valid. The fact that about half (maybe more?!) of the "developed" world celebrates this abomination as a "pinnacle" of social progress, instead of seeing it as a hardcore sign of utter environmental collapse, shows that those celebrating this "pinnacle" are not far behind in endocrine/neurological derangements...and is another confirmation of said environmental collapse.
@Drareg - any glaring confirmations (like that one below) of feminizing substances in the food supply, in high UK govt positions? I heard Scotland was celebrating such "queens" quite a bit.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/sqtu2h/say_hello_to_president_joe_bidens_new_department/

sam_brinton.png
 
Last edited:
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
Looks from your screenshot - reddit is probably celebrating this.

Thx for posting.
I had not seen.
 

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
Looks from your screenshot - reddit is probably celebrating this.

Thx for posting.
I had not seen.

Yep, if you scroll down the Reddit thread you will see all sorts of comments in his defense. The lone comment I was able to find that said this guy should not be flaunting his sexual deviancies (though what he does in his private life is his own business) was downvoted into oblivion. Throwaway account, but still, it shows you Reddit's "make-up" (in both senses of the word).
 

Drareg

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
4,772
FWIW, the rough cut of the unaired documentary "Conspiracy of Silence" is still on the same Youtube channel I watched it on about 4 years ago-


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x-IZS8uKYo


The channel itself isn't monetized, but it's still there. As is this speech from Cathy O'Brien, at an event with Roseanne Barr-


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh7SWnZMPng&t=2460s


I remember hearing this interview with Erik Prince live, just days before the 2016 Presidential election. It is still up on Brietbart, without any corrections or edits since-


All of these survive, even in the environment of the past two years.

Im curious if it was Prince who started the Epstein issue back up again, blackwater has something like 350,000 employees, 150,000 are armed troops with rest based in intel for the most part.

The Clintons are total grime, its no surprise we the see the rise in movements trying to normalise all sorts of sexual degeneracy like paedo's, the ruling class know the information is out there that implicates them, normalising it is a desperate attempt to negate the pushback.
 
Z

Zsazsa

Guest
John Dillermand ("John Penisman",[1] "John Willieman" or "John Dongman") is a Danish stop motion animated children's television series about a man and his very long penis. It premiered on 3 January 2021 on DR Ramasjang.

Premise
John Dillermand is a middle-aged man who wears a red-and-white striped bathing costume.[2] He has a penis that can extend to a length of dozens of meters. John uses his prehensile penis (which stretches through his clothes) as a tool, such as to tame lions or to fly about like a helicopter. But it also often acts independently of John, getting him into trouble.[3]

Development and broadcast
The series is aimed at four- to eight-year-olds and was developed by the Danish public broadcaster DR, ....
 

Hayley

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Messages
112
Location
United States
There’s a book written in the 80s called “After the Ball”, that outlines an activism campaign to make gays acceptable to mainstream society. Part of the book was focused on pedophilia and said they should drop the issue for the time, but bring it back once gays became more accepted. Another major part of the book is explaining that gays and pedophiles must always be made to seem like victims and that nothing is their fault, which you see now with Pedo/MAPS normalization. The book is out of print so very expensive but I’ve seen quotes and reviews of it. It’s all been planned that this
would happen.

This video explains the entire woke playbook outlined by that book.


View: https://youtu.be/YIHzU_tPn1w
 
Last edited:

haidut

Member
Forum Supporter
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
19,799
Location
USA / Europe
John Dillermand ("John Penisman",[1] "John Willieman" or "John Dongman") is a Danish stop motion animated children's television series about a man and his very long penis. It premiered on 3 January 2021 on DR Ramasjang.

Premise
John Dillermand is a middle-aged man who wears a red-and-white striped bathing costume.[2] He has a penis that can extend to a length of dozens of meters. John uses his prehensile penis (which stretches through his clothes) as a tool, such as to tame lions or to fly about like a helicopter. But it also often acts independently of John, getting him into trouble.[3]

Development and broadcast
The series is aimed at four- to eight-year-olds and was developed by the Danish public broadcaster DR, ....

OMG. The fact that child psychologists approved of this creation and thought it was appropriate material for 4-5 year old children is just beyond words. From the Wiki page:
"...He said that the series was "as desexualized as it can possibly get", and that it was developed together with a child psychologist and other professionals who reviewed the scripts to ensure that children would not misinterpret what they saw.[5]"

How would the "psychologist and other professionals" manage to actually ensure (their wording) children seeing this won't misinterpret this show when they see it? Like, they would control what children would think? Or interview personally each child after every episode and demand answers as to how it made the children feel? Typical psychiatric hubris - i.e. "this is OK for children because WE say so, and we guarantee it".
@Drareg - did you see this abomination? It sounds like Epstein directed it.
 

Badger

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
960
OMG. The fact that child psychologists approved of this creation and thought it was appropriate material for 4-5 year old children is just beyond words. From the Wiki page:
"...He said that the series was "as desexualized as it can possibly get", and that it was developed together with a child psychologist and other professionals who reviewed the scripts to ensure that children would not misinterpret what they saw.[5]"

How would the "psychologist and other professionals" manage to actually ensure (their wording) children seeing this won't misinterpret this show when they see it? Like, they would control what children would think? Or interview personally each child after every episode and demand answers as to how it made the children feel? Typical psychiatric hubris - i.e. "this is OK for children because WE say so, and we guarantee it".
@Drareg - did you see this abomination? It sounds like Epstein directed it.
I see pedophilia as one depravity vector among others to be used as a means by which to degrade and demoralize society and make it much more pliable to the agendas of Globalists or what some have called "Globohomo" (the "homo" suffix mostly referring to homogeneity and maybe sexual orientation). I have predicted they sought to completely normalize and legalize pedophilia, and then move onto another depravity/degeneracy to normalize and legalize, such as incest or human-animal sex. But no, they fooled me! In two ways. First, they are not waiting to get pedoism legalized, they want to prepare implementing this next agenda item right away. Second, they are setting aside sexual perversions, at least for now, and trying out something different: cannibalism.

Perhaps Globohomo has shifted strategies, and decided to normalize multiple depravities at the same time, with one form of it helping to erode resistance to it with another. For example, they might ask: if cannibalism is ok, why not pedoism or incest? They can recycle arguments praising one kind of depravity to favor acceptance of others. Hence making numerous initiatives simultaneously at evaporating resistance to all depravities is less time consuming and more economical.

As Dr Tenpenny said, "People are discussing & writing about #cannibalism as if they are trying to desensitize us to the topic. This recent article by #Medscape insinuates that eating people is not so bad as long as you refrain from consuming human brains - think - #PrionDisease

Why the renewed interest in cannibalism?"

This article, which she mentioned in a post, tries normalizing cannibalism as something healthy:
Cannibalism: A health warning
 

PolishSun

Member
Joined
May 25, 2020
Messages
447
I believe a big part of the population will believe in the normality of pedophilia and cannibalism in 50 years from now.
 
OP
Peatful

Peatful

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
3,582
I see pedophilia as one depravity vector among others to be used as a means by which to degrade and demoralize society and make it much more pliable to the agendas of Globalists or what some have called "Globohomo" (the "homo" suffix mostly referring to homogeneity and maybe sexual orientation). I have predicted they sought to completely normalize and legalize pedophilia, and then move onto another depravity/degeneracy to normalize and legalize, such as incest or human-animal sex. But no, they fooled me! In two ways. First, they are not waiting to get pedoism legalized, they want to prepare implementing this next agenda item right away. Second, they are setting aside sexual perversions, at least for now, and trying out something different: cannibalism.

Perhaps Globohomo has shifted strategies, and decided to normalize multiple depravities at the same time, with one form of it helping to erode resistance to it with another. For example, they might ask: if cannibalism is ok, why not pedoism or incest? They can recycle arguments praising one kind of depravity to favor acceptance of others. Hence making numerous initiatives simultaneously at evaporating resistance to all depravities is less time consuming and more economical.

As Dr Tenpenny said, "People are discussing & writing about #cannibalism as if they are trying to desensitize us to the topic. This recent article by #Medscape insinuates that eating people is not so bad as long as you refrain from consuming human brains - think - #PrionDisease

Why the renewed interest in cannibalism?"

This article, which she mentioned in a post, tries normalizing cannibalism as something healthy:
Cannibalism: A health warning
A shocking reminder, but not surprising.

The Masons, satanist and secret societies have been practicing these, in ritual and for pleasure, for many many many years.

Homosexuality. Human Sacrifice. Bestiality. Cannibalism.

And these men and women of the WEF, Skull and Bones, Freemasony etc- now rule our world.
Politics. Hollywood. Technology. Healthcare. Education. Finance. Judicial system. Music industry. And even religion.
 
Z

Zsazsa

Guest
OMG. The fact that child psychologists approved of this creation and thought it was appropriate material for 4-5 year old children is just beyond words. From the Wiki page:
"...He said that the series was "as desexualized as it can possibly get", and that it was developed together with a child psychologist and other professionals who reviewed the scripts to ensure that children would not misinterpret what they saw.[5]"

How would the "psychologist and other professionals" manage to actually ensure (their wording) children seeing this won't misinterpret this show when they see it? Like, they would control what children would think? Or interview personally each child after every episode and demand answers as to how it made the children feel? Typical psychiatric hubris - i.e. "this is OK for children because WE say so, and we guarantee it".
@Drareg - did you see this abomination? It sounds like Epstein directed it.
It gets worse:


And a handful of parents have taken to the Facebook page of DR's children's network, urging them to remove the program.
A spokesperson for DR told CNN that most of those who criticized the program did so "without even (having) seen the show, because it wasn't released yet."

"Now the great majority here in Denmark are ... making fun of the few critics instead," Sarah Cecilie added. "Hundreds of thousands is supporting 'John Dillermand' now."
"In Denmark it is now a huge success, and the children are watching it in big numbers," she said, telling CNN that 200,000 people have viewed the first episode.

In the network's online description of the show, they state that while Dillermand's genitals get him into embarrassing situations, it can be used for good once he embraces that he is different.
DR is Denmark's oldest and most well-known broadcaster, and was a founding member of the European Broadcasting Union. The network is funded by the taxpayer, making it the Danish equivalent of the BBC or PBS.
 
EMF Mitigation - Flush Niacin - Big 5 Minerals
Back
Top Bottom